Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-607 DowsDavid A. Dows R.D. #3 Edinboro, PA 16412 Dear Mr. Dows: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470 (717) 783 -1610 1- 800 - 932 -0936 ADVICE OF COUNSEL October 20, 1998 FAX : (717) 787 - 0806 • Web Site: www.ethics.state.Da.us • e - mail: sec@state.pa.us 98 -607 Re: Conflict; Public Official /Public Employee; Private Employment or Business; Narcotics Agent; Office of Attorney General; Bureau of Narcotic Investigation and Drug Control; United States Postal Service. This responds to your letter of September 16, 1998, by which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether a narcotics agent with the Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control is prohibited or restricted by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law from working with, being employed by or associated with a business /person in a private capacity in addition to public service. Facts: You are currently employed as a Narcotics Agent with the Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control. You have submitted a copy of an Office of Attorney General Investigative Profile and a copy of your job description has been obtained, which documents are incorporated herein by reference. You request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission as to whether you may, in addition to your current service as a Commonwealth employee, accept seasonal part-time employment with the United States Postal Service. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 7(10) and 7(1 1) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law ( "Ethics Law ") 65 P.S. §§407(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 P.S. § §407(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a Narcotics Agent with the Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control, you are a public employee as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that law. Dows, 98 -607 October 20, 1998 Page 2 Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self - employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law provides as follows: Section 3. Restricted activities (j) Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum Dows, 98 -607 October 20, 1998 Page 3 filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to your inquiry, you are advised that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does not prohibit public officials /public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /public employee may not use the authority of his public position — or confidential information obtained by being in that position — for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -01 1. Examples of conduct that would be prohibited under Section 3(a) would include: (1) the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action, Metrick, Order No. 1037; (2) the use of governmental facilities, such as governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, or other property, or the use of governmental personnel, to conduct private business activities, Freind, Order No. 800; Pancoe, supra; and (3) the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official /public employee is associated in his private capacity, such as the review /selection of its bids or proposals, Gorman, Order No. 1041. If the private employer or business with which the public official /public employee is associated would have a matter pending before the governmental body, the public official /public employee would have a conflict of interest as to such matter. Miller, Opinion No. 89 -024. In each instance of a conflict of interest, the public official /public employee would be required to abstain from participation and to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Section 3(j). Under the facts which you have submitted, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment /business activity. The United States Postal Service would not be a business with which your are associated since it is a U.S. governmental agency. However, the restrictions of Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would still apply to you, as for example, you could not perform any of your job duties for the Post Office during your working hours with the Attorney General. This Advice is limited to addressing the applicability of Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law. It is expressly assumed that there has been no use of authority of office for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law. Further, you are advised that Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /public employee and no public official /public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official /public employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the Doves, 98 -607 October 20, 1998 Page 4 law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of any restrictions imposed upon you by the Office of Attorney General as to outside employment. Conclusion: As a Narcotics Agent with the Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Narcotics Investigation and Drug Control, you are a public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment /business activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as noted above. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal, erely, incent Kopko Chief Counsel