Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-504 DiBuonaventuroJohn P. DiBuonaventuro 86 Andover Court Wayne, PA 19087 Dear Mr. DiBuonaventuro: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL January 8, 1997 97 -504 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); Executive -Level State Employee; Section 3(i); Director; Office of the Governor, Southeastern Pennsylvania. This responds to your letter of December 2, 1996 in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law presents any restrictions upon employment of the Director of the Office of the Governor, Southeastern Pennsylvania, following termination of service with the Governor's Office. Facts: You have served as the Director of the Office of the Governor, Southeastern PA from January 18, 1995 to December 31, 1996. Your office was responsible for five Counties — Chester, Delaware, Bucks, Montgomery, and Philadelphia. The regional offices serve as local communication links between the Administration and local business, government, and community leaders. As Director, you reported to the Deputy Chief of Staff. As of January 1, 1997, you accepted a position as Managing Director for Century Financial Partners, LLC (CFP). CFP is based in Atlanta and provides advisory and capital raising services to the long term care and senior housing markets in both the private and public sector. Paul Zelenkofske of Jenkintown is Chairman and Troy Taylor, formerly of KPMG, is President and located in Atlanta. Your role will be one of Account Representative and along with handling government relations for the firm, you will be responsible for the following: 1. Development of the privatization business as it relates to national, state, municipality, and county owned nursing homes, assisted living facilities, retirement homes, and senior occupied low income housing developments. DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 2 2. Geography includes all states in the U.S. with Pennsylvania counties as the initial target. 3. To identify opportunities and qualify the ability and willingness of local government representatives to realistically complete the transaction. 4. Liaison to completion between the CFP project team and client. 5. Report status and recommended actions relating to the various current transactions and prospects. 6. Know and keep CFP informed of competitive information and trends in the marketplace both in the public and private sector. 7. Create and maintain awareness, within the appropriate governmental institutions, of CFP past performances, successes and mission. 8. Investigate and assess the privatization of various other government owned assets. In addition to the above responsibilities, the new position requires SEC licensing including Series 7 and 63. You have asked the following specific inquiries as to ethics issues: 1. Whether you will be permitted to ask members of the Governor's Office for introductions to individuals (including government officials) in other states and counties within Pennsylvania other than Delaware, Bucks, Montgomery, Chester, and Philadelphia? 2. Whether there are any particular responsibilities and /or restrictions regarding information you learned while working in state government, specifically the Department of Public Welfare's Byberry and Eastern State locations which could be considered as future sites for some type of senior housing? 3. Whether you will be permitted to ask for and receive basic information regarding the nursing home and health care industry within and outside the state from members of the Administration? 4. Whether you will be permitted to communicate with certain agencies regarding the firm's business? Because of the industry in which the firm hopes to be involved, and the proposed use of taxable and tax - exempt financing, you believe that you and the firm may have, from time to time, issues with the following agencies: State, Health, Aging, Public Welfare, Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, and the Governor's Office. DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 3 5. Whether you will be permitted to do non -state related business with county governments across Pennsylvania including Chester, Delaware, Bucks, Montgomery and Philadelphia? Discussion: In your former capacity as Director for the Office of the Governor, Southeastern PA, you would be considered a public official /public employee and an "executive -level state employee" within the definition of these terms as set forth in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law and the Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code § 1 1.1. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Executive -level State employee." The Governor, Lieutenant Governor, cabinet members, deputy secretaries, the Governor's office staff, any State employee with discretionary powers which may affect the outcome of a State agency's decision in relation to a private corporation or business or any employee who by virtue of his job function could influence the outcome of such a decision. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 4 public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Section 3(g) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (g) No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Re Ac tivities (i) No former executive -level State employee may for a period of two years from the time that he terminates his State employment be employed by, receive compensation from, assist or act in a representative capacity for a business or corporation that he actively participates in recruiting to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or that he actively participated in inducing to open a new plant, facility or branch in the Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to expand an existent plant or facility within the Commonwealth, provided that the above prohibition shall be invoked only when the recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth to the business or 4 corporation recruited or induced to expand. Under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law quoted above, a public official /employee may not use the authority of public office/ employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family, or business with which he or a member of his immediate family.is associated. In applying Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law to the proffered facts, Section 3(a) would prohibit you from using the position or emoluments of your public position or confidential information to advance an opportunity of private employment with CFP. Once again, it is not suggested that you have engaged in such conduct and the foregoing is provided to give a complete response to your inquiry. As for Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you would be subject to that provision of law since you would be a former executive -level state employee. However, Section 3(i) would not restrict you from the position of employment with CFP provided and DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 5 conditioned upon the assumptions that you did not actively participate in recruiting CFP to Pennsylvania, and that you did not actively participate in recruiting or inducing CFP to open or expand a facility or branch in Pennsylvania through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to CFP. Upon termination of public service, you also became a "former" public official /public employee subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. To answer your request with respect to Section 3(g), the governmental body with which you were associated while working with the Office of the Governor must be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed. The term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the definition of the term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official /employee had influence or control but extended to the entire governmental body with which the public official /employee was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the Iegis!ative debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term: We sought to make particularly clear that when we are prohibiting for 1 year that revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing not only with a particular subdivision of an agency or a local government but the entire unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291. The Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa. C.S.A. §1901. Based upon the above, the governmental body with which you were associated upon termination of public service would be the Governor's Office in its entirety, including but not limited to the Southeastern PA Office, together with any boards or commissions on which you served or as to which you acted in the Governor's stead and any similar bodies over which you exercised influence, discretionary authority or DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 6 control. The above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former Division Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not merely restricted to the particular Division as was contended but was in fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R, it was determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the entire Senate as his former governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service with the Governor's Office, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the former governmental body, specifically the Governor's Office in its entirety, together with any boards or commissions on which you served or as to which you acted in the Governor's stead and any similar bodies over which you exercised influence, discretionary authority or control. Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section 3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the former governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which a person may engage, following departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his association with his former governmental body. In respect to the one year restriction against such "representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. The Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations in general or as to contracts; 2. Attempts to influence; DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 7 3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /employee; 4. Participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; 5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the former governmental body in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section 3(g) would also prohibit in general the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even though the invoices pertain to a contract which existed prior to termination of public service. Shay, Opinion 91 -012. However, in the event of work performed on a contract already awarded ,,and not involving the unit where the former public employee worked, the name of the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. Abrams /Webster, Opinion 95 -01 1. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service, you should not engage in any of the prohibited activities outlined above. You may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to your former governmental body. However, you may not be identified on documents submitted to your former governmental body. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before your former governmental body. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to your former governmental body. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general informational inquiries of your former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public. This must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the Ethics Law: Section 2. Definitions. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, the Commission held that Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from providing consulting services to his former governmental body for a period of one year after termination of service in that the prohibition against representing a person includes the former public official /employee representing himself. Having set forth the above, your specific inquiries shall now be considered. DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 8 In response to your first specific inquiry, pursuant to Section 3(g), you would not be permitted to ask members of the Governor's Office for such introductions. Such conduct would constitute representation of your new employer before your former governmental body. As for your second specific inquiry, you could not use confidential information that you learned while working for the former governmental body for a prohibited private pecuniary benefit. The acquisition of confidential information while you served in a position of public employment, and the subsequent receipt of a financial benefit for or through such confidential information, would be sufficient to make out the elements of a Section 3(a) violation. The above would apply generally as well as to the specific examples you cited (Department of Public Welfare's Byberry and Eastern State locations). In response to your third specific inquiry, as noted above, you could make general informational inquiries of your former governmental body to secure information which is available to the general public so long as such would not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. In response to your fourth specific inquiry, you would be permitted to so communicate with agencies which are not included within your former governmental body. In response to your fifth and final specific inquiry, as noted above, the restrictions of Section 3(g) apply to restrict you as to your former governmental body and so would not apply to restrict you as to County governments which are not included within your former governmental body. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. Conclusion: In your former capacity as Director for the Office of the Governor, Southeastern PA, you would be considered a public official /public employee and an executive -level state employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Under Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you would not be prohibited from accepting a position of employment with Century Financial Partners, LLC (CFP) based upon the assumptions that you did not actively participate in recruiting CFP to Pennsylvania, and that you did not actively participate in recruiting or inducing CFP to open or expand a facility or branch in Pennsylvania through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Upon termination of service with the Office of the Governor, you became a "former" public official /public employee subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former governmental body is the Office of the Governor in its entirety, including but not limited to the Southeastern PA office, together with any boards or commissions on which you served or as to which you acted in the Governor's stead and any similar bodies over which you exercised influence, discretionary authority or control. The restrictions as to DiBuonaventuro, 97 -504 January 8, 1997 Page 9 representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed for the year following termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa, Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. 7 erely, Vincent J. Kopko Chief Counsel