HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-572 PetrinaSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 5, 1995
John J. Petrina
4402 Avon Drive
Harrisburg, PA 17112 95 -572
Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); Sign Technician
Supervisor; Department of General Services.
Dear Mr. Petrina:
This responds to your letter of May 9, 1995, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any restrictions upon employment of a sign technician
supervisor following termination of service with the Department of
General Services (DGS).
Facts: You were a sign technician with DGS until you retired in
December 1994. You are currently self employed as a commercial
artist. You stated it was your understanding that those persons
required to file the financial disclosure form or code of ethics
for while employed by the Commonwealth are required to wait one
year after leaving state service before performing similar type of
work with any agency or entity under the Governor's jurisdiction.
You also state the Governor's Office of Administration (OA)
informed you that, since you were never required to submit either
of those forms while employed by DGS, the waiting period does not
apply to you. You request advice from the Commission under the
Ethics Law. You specifically ask if you must wait for any period
or if you are now permitted to take on artist type jobs, in
particular indoor and outdoor signage, for the Pennsylvania General
Assembly and /or the state executive branch.
Discussion: The first question to be answered is whether you, in
your capacity as a sign technician supervisor for DGS, were
considered a "public employee." The Ethics Law defines that term
as follows:
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 2
65 P.S. 5402.
Section 2. Definitions
"Public employee." Any
the Commonwealth or a
who is responsible for
official action of a
with regard to:
individual employed by
political subdivision
taking or recommending
nonministerial nature
contracting or procurement;
administering or monitoring grants or
subsidies;
planning or zoning;
inspecting, licensing, regulating or
auditing any person; or
any other activity where the official
action has an economic impact of greater
than a de minimis nature on the interests
of any person.
"Public employee" shall not include individ-
uals who are employed by the State or any
political subdivision thereof in teaching as
distinguished from administrative duties.
The regulations of the State Ethics Commission similarly
define the term public employee as above with the additional
following criteria:
(ii) The following criteria will be
used, in part, to determine whether an
individual is within the definition of "public
employee ":
(A) The individual normally performs his
responsibility in the field without onsite
supervision.
(B) The individual is the immediate
supervisor of a person who normally performs
his responsibility in the field without onsite
supervision.
(C) The individual is the supervisor of
a highest level field office.
(D) The individual has the authority to
make final decisions.
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 3
(E) The individual has the authority to
forward or stop recommendations from being
sent to the person or body with the authority
to make final decisions.
(F) The individual prepares or
supervises the preparation of final
recommendations.
(G) The individual makes final technical
recommendations.
(H) The individual's recommendations or
actions are an inherent and recurring part of
his position.
(I) The individual's recommendations or
actions affect organizations other than his
own organization.
(iii) The term does not include
individuals who are employed by the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision of the
Commonwealth in teaching as distinguished from
administrative duties.
(iv) Persons in the following positions
are generally considered public employes:
(A) Executive and special directors or
assistants reporting directly to the agency
head or governing body.
(B) Commonwealth bureau directors,
division chiefs or heads of equivalent
organization elements and other governmental
body department heads.
(C) Staff attorneys engaged in
representing the department, agency or other
governmental bodies.
(D) Engineers, managers and secretary -
treasurers acting as managers, police chiefs,
chief clerks, chief purchasing agents, grant
and contract managers, administrative
officers, housing and building inspectors,
investigators, auditors, sewer enforcement
officers and zoning officers in all
governmental bodies.
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 4
51 Pa. Code §11.1.
(E) Court administrators, assistants for
fiscal affairs and deputies for the minor
judiciary.
(F) School superintendents, assistant
superintendents, school business managers and
principals.
(G) Persons who report directly to heads
of executive, legislative and independent
agencies, boards and commissions except
clerical personnel.
(v) Persons in the following positions
are generally not considered public employes:
(A) City clerks, other clerical staff,
road masters, secretaries, police officers,
maintenance workers, construction workers,
equipment operators and recreation directors.
(B) Law clerks, court criers, court
reporters, probation officers, security guards
and writ servers.
(C) School teachers and clerks of the
schools.
The question you present must be reviewed under these
provisions of the statute and the regulations of the Commission in
light of your duties and obligations as described in your job
description and /or classification specifications, under which you
operated. The inquiry necessarily focuses on the job itself and
not on the individual incumbent in the position, the, variable
functions of the position, or the manner in which a particular
individual occupying a position might have carried out those
functions. See Phillips v. State Ethics Commission, 79 Pa. Commw.
491, 470 A.2d 659 (1984); and Mummau v. Ranck, 531 Fed. Supp. 402
(E.D. Pa. 1982).
Also, in reviewing your question,. the Commonwealth Court in
its ruling in Phillips, supra, at page 661, directs that coverage
of the Ethics Act be construed broadly, rather than narrowly, and
conversely, directs that exclusions from the Ethics Law should be
narrowly construed. Based upon this directive and reviewing the
definition of "public employee" in the statute and the regulations
and opinions of this Commission, in light of your job functions and
the information available to us, the necessary conclusion that you
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 5
were a "public employee" subject to the financial reporting and
disclosure requirements of the State Ethics Act.
It is clear that in your capacity as a sign technician
supervisor, you had the ability to recommend official action with
respect to subparagraph (1) within the definition of "public
employee" as set forth in the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. §402.
Specifically, a sign technician supervisor "orders supplies
necessary to complete work requests, . . . must anticipate and
order inventory for future jobs. . . .[and p]repares [a] list of
materials and source of suppliers to different state agencies." A
sign technician supervisor also " [r] eview [s] and write [s] bid specs
for equipment and or supplies and submit [s] through proper channels
to procure such items." These activities fall within the
definition of public employee as contained in the regulations of
the Commission in Section 11.1, subparagraph (i)(A), (ii)(G), and
(ii)(I). 51 Pa. Code §11.1. Under these circumstances and given
your former duties and responsibilities as outlined above, you were
a "public employee" as that term is defined in the Ethics Law.
Accordingly, you must file a Statement of Financial Interests
for each year in which you hold the position outlined above and for
the year following your termination of this service. You state in
your letter, OA informed you that you were not required to file a
"financial disclosure form" or a "code of ethics form" while you
were employed by DGS. However, because you were a "public
employee" as defined under the Public Official and Employee Ethics
Law, you were required to file a "Statement of Financial Interests"
as stated in this law. The other form you referenced, the "code of
ethics form," appears to be the form some individuals must file as
required by the Governor's Code of Ethics. The Commission has no
jurisdiction over the Governor's Code of Ethics nor of the forms
required to be filed under it. Therefore, this advice is limited
to the requirements of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law.
Your letter was not clear on whether you had indeed filed
Statements of Financial Interests while you were a DGS employee or
whether you filed one for the year following your termination of
service. If you have not already done so, the appropriate
Statements of Financial Interests must be filed within 30 days of
this Advice.
This advice now turns to restrictions the Ethics Law places on
former public employees. Because you were considered a public
employee while working for DGS, upon termination of public service,
you became a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of
the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the
Ethics Act provides that:
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 6
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(g) No former public official or public
employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter
before the governmental body with which he has
been associated for one year after he leaves
that body.
Initially, to answer your questions concerning restrictions
the Ethics Law places on you as a former public employee, the
governmental body with which you were associated while working with
DGS must be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions
associated with the concept and term of "representation" must be
reviewed.
The term "governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the
Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been
associated." The governmental body within
State government or a political subdivision
by which the public official or employee is or
has been employed or to which the public
official or employee is or has been appointed
or elected and subdivisions and offices within
that governmental body.
In applying the above definition to the instant matter, we
must conclude that the governmental body with which you were
associated upon termination of public service would be DGS. The
above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative
intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290,
291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli,
Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former Division
Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not merely
restricted to the particular Division as was contended but was in
fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation
restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R, it was
determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator
was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the
entire Senate as his former governmental body.
Therefore, within the first year after termination of service
with DGS, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict
representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis DGS.
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 7
It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the
definition of the term "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the
specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so
that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official/
employee had influence or control but extended to the entire
governmental body with which the public official /employee was
associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the legislative
debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term:
We sought to make particularly clear that
when we are prohibiting for 1 year that
revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing
not only with a particular subdivision of an
agency or a local government but the entire
unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989
Session, No. 15 at 290, 291.
Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain
and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa.
C.S.A. §1901, it is clear that the governmental body with which you
were associated is DGS.
Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section
3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before
agencies or entities other than with respect to the former
governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the
type of employment in which a person may engage, following
departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that
the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial
conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the
law generally is that during the term of a person's public
employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon
departure from the public sector, that individual should not be
allowed to utilize his association with the public sector,
officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer,
treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his
association with his former governmental body.
In respect to the one year restriction against such
"representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Represent." To act on behalf of any
other person in any activity which includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying
and submitting bid or contract proposals which
are signed by or contain the name of a former
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 8
public official or public employee.
The Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also
interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of
the Ethics Law to prohibit:
1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body
or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or
renegotiations in general or as to contracts;
2. Attempts to influence;
3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed
by or contain the name of the former public
official /employee;
4. Participating in ,any matters before the former
governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person;
5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any
person or employer before the former governmental body in
relation to legislation, regulations, etc.
The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the
person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former
governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former
governmental body. In Shay, Opinion 91 -012, the Commission held
that Section 3(g) would prohibit the inclusion of the name of a
former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even though the
invoices pertained to a contract which existed prior to termination
of public service. Therefore, within the first year after
termination of service, you should not engage in the type of
activity outlined above.
You may assist in the preparation of any documents presented
to DGS. However, you may not be identified on documents submitted
to DGS. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's
appearance before DGS. Once again, however, the activity in this
respect should not be revealed to DGS. Of course, any ban under
the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general
informational inquiries of DGS to secure information which is
available to the general public. This must not be done in an
effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to
otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work
for the new employer.
In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the
Ethics Law:
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 9
Section 2. Definitions.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association,
firm, partnership, committee, club or other
organization or group of persons.
In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, the Commission held that
Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from
providing consulting services to his former governmental body for
a period of one year after termination of service in that the
prohibition against representing a person includes the former
public official /employee representing himself.
In your letter you ask if you must wait for any period of time
before you take on artist type jobs, in particular indoor and
outdoor signage, for the General Assembly or the state executive
branch. First, as described above, the one year prohibition is on
"representation" and not just on "artist type jobs." Second, the
Ethics Law places the one -year prohibition on you with respect to
representing a person before DGS, your former governmental body.
Because the General Assembly and executive agencies other than DGS
are not your former governmental body, the prohibition on
representation would not apply with respect to them. If, however,
to perform artist type work for one of these other governmental
bodies you must contract with or "represent" yourself before DGS,
such conduct would be prohibited under the one -year prohibition.
Furthermore, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of
monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official
action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be
influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the
law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As a sign technician supervisor, you were considered
a "public employee" as defined in the Ethics Law. As such, you
were required to file Statements of Financial Interests for each
year you held the position noted above. Upon termination of
service with DGS, you became a "former public employee" subject to
Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former governmental body is
Petrina, John J., 95 -572
June 5, 1995
Page 10
DGS. The restrictions as to representation
followed. The propriety of the proposed
addressed under the Ethics Law.
Further, as outlined above, the Ethics
a Statement of Financial Interests be filed
termination of service.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the
full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the
Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §13.2(h). The appeal may
be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States
mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty
(30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
ncerely,
incent Dopko
Chief Counsel
outlined above must be
conduct has only been
Law also requires that
for the year following