HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-561 HopkinsE. Harry Hopkins
RR 1, Box 349
Falls, PA 18615
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
May 3, 1995
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
95 -561
Re: Simultaneous Service, Township Supervisor, County Commissioner
Dear Mr. Hopkins:
This responds to your letter of April 12, 1995, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law imposes
any prohibition or restriction upon a township supervisor from also
serving as a county commissioner.
Facts: You are currently a township supervisor and are running for
county commissioner. You seek advice from the Commission under the
Ethics Law and ask whether you can hold both offices
simultaneously.
Discussion: As a township supervisor, you are a "public official"
as that term is defined in the Ethics Law and hence are subject to
the provisions of the Ethics Law. 65 P.S. 402.
As to whether the Ethics Act would restrict or prohibit a
township supervisor from also serving as a county commissioner, it
is noted that the State Ethics Commission may only address
questions regarding the duties and responsibilities of public
officials within the purview of the Public Official and Employees
Ethics Act. The Commission does not specifically have the
statutory jurisdiction to interpret the provisions of the County
Code. If, however, another provision of law somehow impacts on the
provisions of the Ethics Law or the Ethics Law accords jurisdiction
in relation to other provisions of law, then this Commission may be
required to interpret such provisions of law. See Bigler, Opinion
85 -020.
Hopkins, E. Harry, 95 -561
May 3, 1995
Page 2
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined under the Ethics Law:
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member or his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and (c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value or no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is
made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or
will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete
response to the question presented.
The Commission has determined if a particular statutory
enactment prohibits an official from receiving of a particular
benefit, then that official's receipt of such a prohibited benefit,
through the authority of public office, would also be a use of the
authority of office contrary to Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law. In
this respect, this Commission has been called upon, on various
occasions, to determine whether a specific pecuniary benefit or
financial gain is prohibited by law. In order to determine whether
Hopkins, E. Harry, 95 -561
May 3, 1995
Page 3
a particular pecuniary benefit or gain is strictly prohibited by
law, the provisions of the County Code must be reviewed:
Incompatible Offices
(a) No elected county officer or county solicitor shall, at
the same time, serve as a member of the legislative body
of any city, borough, town or township of any class, nor
as treasurer or tax collector of any city, borough,
incorporated town or township, nor as school director of
any school district, nor as a member of any board of
health.
16 P.S. 5402.
The County Code does not appear to contain any exceptions to
the above provision that is applicable in the instant situation.
Therefore, if an individual takes or continues to hold the office
of county commissioner and attempts to simultaneously serve as a
member of the legislative body of a township, the individual would
be doing so contrary to the provisions of the County Code.
Therefore, if you were to serve as county commissioner while
simultaneously serving as township supervisor, you would be holding
a position as a member of the legislative body of a township, which
is expressly prohibited by law. Although only the Pennsylvania
General Assembly has the inherent authority to declare offices
incompatible, the State Ethics Commission may review the Ethics Law
to determine that a conflict exists based upon the statutory
incompatibility. Johnson, Opinion 86 -004. As a result of the
foregoing, any salary, benefits or gain which the public official
would receive in that office would not be authorized in law in
light of the foregoing incompatibility provision; consequently, any
gain or pecuniary benefit that the public official would receive
would be a gain other than compensation provided for by law. King,
Opinion 85 -025.
Lastly, it must be noted that the propriety of the proposed
course of conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As a township supervisor, you are a "public official"
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. As a "public
official," you may not, consistent with the provisions of the
Ethics Law, simultaneously serve in the positions of township
supervisor and county commissioner.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed course of conduct has
only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
Hopkins, E. Harry, 95 -561
May 3, 1995
Page 4
such.
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the
full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the
Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 513.2(h). The appeal may
be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States
mail, delivery service, or by FAS transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within fifteen
(15) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
erely,
Vincent J'JDopko
Chief Counsel