HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-550 BoyerHarry R. Boyer
R.D. #2 Box 102
Newport, PA 17074
Dear Mr. Boyer:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 19, 1995
95 -550
Re: Public Employee /Official, County Commissioner, Newspaper
Writer, Candidate.
This responds to your letter of March 17, 1995, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether a candidate for public office is to be considered
a "public employee" or "public official" under the State Ethics
Law, and therefore, subject to the restrictions and prohibitions of
the State Ethics Law.
Facts: You are a candidate for County Commissioner in Perry
County. You are also an outdoor writer for three local newspapers
in Perry County. You state that you were told by the Ethics
Commission staff that there was no conflict under the Ethics Law.
However, you request a written reply of any conflict of interest
under the Ethics Law concerning your employment with the newspapers
and your candidacy.
Discussion: The primary question to be answered is whether a
candidate for public office is considered a "public official" as
that term is defined in the State Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Public Official." Any person elected by
the public or elected or appointed by a
governmental body, or an appointed official in
the Executive, Legislative or Judicial Branch
of the State or any political subdivision
thereof, provided that it shall not include
members of advisory boards that have no
authority to expend public funds other than
reimbursement for personal expense, or to
Boyer, Harry R., 95 -550
April 19, 1995
Page 2
otherwise exercise the power of the State or
any political subdivision thereof.
As a candidate for public office you are not a "person elected
by the public or elected or appointed by a governmental body."
Therefore, we conclude that as a candidate for public office, you
are not considered a "public official" as that term is defined in
the State Ethics Law. Hence, the Ethics Law does not prohibit or
restrict the private employment of a candidate for public office
except with respect to sections 3(b) and (c), which apply to
everyone.
Section 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that
no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of
monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or
accept any thing of monetary value based upon the understanding
that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public
official /employee would be influenced thereby.
If and when you are elected as a County Commissioner, you
would be a public official as that term is defined under the Ethics
Law, and hence you would be subject to the provisions of that Law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
Boyer, Harry R., 95 -550
April 19, 1995
Page 3
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
"Business with which he is associated."
Any business in which the person or a member
of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a
financial interest.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
instant matter, it is noted that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law
does not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business
activities or employment; however, the public official /employee may
not use the authority of office for the advancement of his own
private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is
associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A public official /employee
must exercise caution so that his private business activities do
not conflict with his public duties. Crisci, Opinion 89 -013.
Thus, a public official /employee could not perform private business
using governmental facilities or personnel. In particular, the
governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research
materials, personnel or any other property could not be used as a
means, in whole or part, to carry out private business activities.
In addition, the public official /employee could not during
government working hours, solicit or promote such business
activity. Pancoe, supra. Similarly, Section 3(a) would expressly
prohibit the use of confidential information received by holding
public office/ employment for such a prohibited private pecuniary
benefit.
In the event that your private employer or business has a
matter pending before the County or if you as part of such official
duties would have to participate, review or pass upon that matter,
a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In those
instances, it would be necessary that you be removed from that
process.
In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law
would require not only that you abstain from participation but also
file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording
the minutes.
Boyer, Harry R., 95 -550
April 19, 1995
Page 4
In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following:
1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in
a private capacity;
2. utilization of confidential information gained through
public position;
3. participating in discussions, reviews, or
on matters which relate to the business /private employer
which may come before the governmental body and in such
cases publicly announcing the relationship or advising
the supervisor as well as filing a written memorandum as
per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law.
Brooks, Opinion 89 -023.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As a candidate for County Commissioner, you are not to
be considered a public official as defined in the State Ethics Law.
Accordingly, you are not subject to restrictions or prohibitions
under the Ethics Law concerning private employment, except for
Sections 3(b) and 3(c) which are applicable to everyone.
As a Commissioner for Perry County, you would be a public
official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3 (a)
of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment/
business activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as
noted above. In the event that the employer /business has matters
pending before the County, then you would not be able to
participate in that matter and the disclosure requirements of
Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as outlined above must be satisfied.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Boyer, Harry R., 95 -550
April 19, 1995
Page 5
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the
full Commission. .A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the
Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 513.2(h). The appeal may
be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States
mail delivery service, or by PAZ transmission (717-787-0806).
Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within fifteen
(15) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Si cerely,
Vincent ". Dopko
Chief Counsel