HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-547 GlotfeltyCaren E. Glotfelty
232 Brick Mill Road
Christiana, PA 17509
Dear Ms. Glotfelty:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 13, 1995
95 -547
Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); Executive -Level State
Employee; Section 3(i); Deputy Secretary; Department of
Environmental Resources.
This responds to your letter of March 9, 1995, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any restrictions upon employment of a deputy secretary
following termination of service with the Department of
Environmental Resources (DER).
Facts: You were Deputy Secretary for Water Management for DER from
April 3, 1991 to February 24, 1995. Currently, you are a finalist
for the Maurice Goddard Chair in the School of Forest Resources at
the Pennsylvania State University. The Goddard Chair is different
from a typical faculty appointment because half of the chair -
holder's time will be devoted to public service.
You are currently working as a consultant on environmental
resource policy issues. You have been contracted to write a paper
on national water policy issues, which will be discussed at
meetings and conferences around the country. Additionally, you are
working as a subcontractor for a Philadelphia -based public
relations firm. Your work for the firm has thus far been limited
to a New Jersey project. However, you are interested in broadening
your consulting relationship with the Philadelphia firm. You ask
for advice from the Commission under the Ethics Law concerning the
above outlined activities.
Discussion: As the Deputy Secretary for Water Management, you were
considered a "public employee" within the definition of that term
as set forth in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law and the
Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §11.1.
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 2
This conclusion is based upon the job description, which when
reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that the power
exists to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial
nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning,
inspecting, administering or monitoring grants, leasing,
regulating, auditing or other activities where the economic impact
is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person.
In addition, you are an executive -level state employee as that
term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to
the requirements of Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, infra.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 3
"Executive -level State employee." The
Governor, Lieutenant Governor, cabinet
members, deputy secretaries, the Governor's
office staff, any State employee with
discretionary powers which may affect the
outcome of a State agency's decision in
relation to a private corporation or business
or any employee who by virtue of his job
function could influence the outcome of such a
decision.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is
made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has
been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a
complete response to the question presented.
Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities
(i) No former executive -level State
employee may for a period of two years from
the time that he terminates his State
employment be employed by, receive
compensation from, assist or act in a
representative capacity for a business or
corporation that he actively participates in
recruiting to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
or that he actively participated in inducing
to open a new plant, facility or branch in the
Commonwealth or that he actively participated
in inducing to expand an existent plant or
facility within the Commonwealth, provided
that the above prohibition shall be invoked .
only when the recruitment or inducement is
accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a
promise of a grant or loan of money from the
Commonwealth to the business or corporation
recruited or induced to expand.
Under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law quoted above, a public
official /employee may not use the authority of public office/
employment or confidential information received by holding such a
public position for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 4
member of his immediate family, or business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
In applying Section 3 (a) of the Ethics Law to the proffered
facts, Section 3(a) would prohibit you from using the position or
emoluments of your public position or confidential information to
advance an opportunity of private employment with the Pennsylvania
State University (Penn State) or with other employers of your
environmental policy consulting services. Once again, it is not
suggested that you have engaged in such conduct and the foregoing
is provided to give a complete response to your inquiry.
As to Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you are subject to that
provision of law since you are an executive -level state employee.
However, Section 3(i) would not restrict you from the position of
employment with Penn State or with other employers of your
consulting services provided you did not actively participate in
recruiting or inducing them to open a new facility or branch in the
Commonwealth or participate in inducing one of them to expand an
existing plant or facility that was accomplished by a grant or loan
of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to one of them.
The facts do not indicate whether you actively participated in
recruiting or inducing Penn State, the Philadelphia -based firm, or
other private employers seeking your consulting services to open a
new facility or branch or expand through a grant or loan of money
or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth.
Conditioned upon the assumption that there has been no active
participation by you in such recruitment or inducement of these
current and potential employers to open or expand a facility or
branch through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or
loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, you would not
be prohibited from accepting the position of employment with such
employers.
Upon termination of public service, you became a "former
public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the Ethics Act provides that:
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(g) No former public official or public
employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter
before the governmental body with which he has
been associated for one year after he leaves
that body.
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 5
Initially, to answer your request the governmental body with
which you were associated while working with Water Management must
be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated
with the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed.
The term "governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the
Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been
associated." The governmental body within
State government or a political subdivision
by which the public official or employee is or
has been employed or to which the public
official or employee is or has been appointed
or elected and subdivisions and offices within
that governmental body.
In applying the above definition to the instant matter, we
must conclude that the governmental body with which you were
associated upon termination of public service would be DER. The
above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative
intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290,
291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli,
Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former Division
Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not merely
restricted to the particular Division as was contended but was in
fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation
restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R, it was
determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator
was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the
entire Senate as his former governmental body.
Therefore, within the first year after termination of service
with Water Management, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply
and restrict representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis
DER.
It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the
definition of the term "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the
specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so
that it was not merely limited to the area where a public
official /employee had influence or control but extended to the
entire governmental body with which the public official /employee
was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 6
legislative debate relative to the amendatory language for the
above term:
We sought to make particularly clear that
when we are prohibiting for 1 year that
revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing
not only with a particular subdivision of an
agency or a local government but the entire
unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989
Session, No. 15 at 290, 291.
Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain
and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa.
C.S.A. §1901, it is clear that the governmental body with which you
were associated is DER.
Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section
3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before
agencies or entities other than with respect to the former
governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the
type of employment in which a person may engage, following
departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that
the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial
conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the
law generally is that during the term of a person's public
employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon
departure from the public sector, that individual should not be
allowed to utilize his association with the public sector,
officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer,
treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his
association with his former governmental body.
In respect to the one year restriction against such
"representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Represent." To act on behalf of any
other person in any activity which includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying
and submitting bid or contract proposals which
are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
The Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also
interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of
the Ethics Law to prohibit:
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 7
1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body
or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or
renegotiations in general or as to contracts;
2. Attempts to influence;
3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed
by or contain the name of the former public
official /employee;
4. Participating in any matters before the former
governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person;
5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any
person or employer before the former governmental body in
relation to legislation, regulations, etc.
The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the
person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former
governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former
governmental body. In Shay, Opinion 91 -012, the Commission held
that Section 3(g) would prohibit the inclusion of the name of a
former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even though the
invoices pertained to a contract which existed prior to termination
of public service. Therefore, within the first year after
termination of service, you should not engage in the type of
activity outlined above.
You may assist in the preparation of any documents presented
to DER. However, you may not be identified on documents submitted
to DER. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's
appearance before DER. Once again, however, the activity in this
respect should not be revealed to DER. Of course, any ban under
the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general
informational inquiries of DER to secure information which is
available to the general public. This must not be done in an
effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to
otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work
for the new employer.
In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the
Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association,
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 8
firm, partnership, committee, club or other
organization or group of persons.
In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, the Commission held that
Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from
providing consulting services to his former governmental body for
a period of one year after termination of service in that the
prohibition against representing a person includes the former
public official /employee representing himself.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not .
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As Deputy Secretary for DER, you were considered a
"public employee" and an executive -level state employee subject to
the provisions of the Ethics Law. Under Section 3(i) of the Ethics
Law, you would not be prohibited from accepting a position of
employment with Penn State, the Philadelphia -based firm, or other
private employers seeking your environmental consulting services
based upon the assumption that you did not actively participate in
inducing or recruiting said current or potential employers to open
or expand a facility or branch through a grant or loan of money or
a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. Upon termination of service with DER, you became a
"former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics
Law. The former governmental body is DER. The restrictions as to
representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of
the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Further, the Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of
Financial Interests be filed for the year following termination of
service.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the
Glotfelty, Caren E., 95 -547
April 13, 1995
Page 9
full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the
Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa .Code 513.2(h). The appeal may
be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States
mail, delivery service, or by FAS transmission .(717- 787 -0806) .
Failure to file such an appeal at the Commis81012 within fifteen
(15) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
erely,
Vincent JJ Dot6ko
Chief Counsel