HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-534 LargeSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
March 22, 1995
James Large
Box 244 A Sunnyside Hallow Road
Monongahela, PA 15063 95 -534
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Second Class Township
Supervisor, Candidate, Criminal Conviction.
Dear Mr. Large:
This responds to your letter of February 17, 1995 in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a person with a
criminal conviction from running as a candidate for the office of
second class township supervisor.
Facts: You are interested in running for the position of a second
class township supervisor in Forward Township, Allegheny County.
Given your past activities which involve Ethics Law violations, you
ask whether you are qualified to be a candidate. You enclose your
August 7, 1990 sentence report and seek a prompt ruling.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 7(10)
and 7(11) of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. § §407(10), (11), advisories
are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the
requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the
facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not
engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it
speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the
burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 P.S. § §407(10), (11). An
advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has
truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As candidate for Forward Township Supervisor, you would
become, if elected, a public official as that term is defined under
the Ethics Law, and hence you would be subject to the provisions of
that law.
James Large, 95 -534
March 22, 1995
Page 2
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby.
As to the specific question you pose, Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Law does not prohibit a person with a criminal conviction
from running for office. Therefore, the Ethics Law would not bar
you from running for office as a second class township supervisor
even with your criminal conviction. However, questions as to your
ability to run for office under the Pennsylvania Constitution or
other statutes may exist. It is suggested that you consult with
your private attorney on such issues.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code,
ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the
James Large, 95 -534
March 22, 1995
Page 3
Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed
herein is the applicability of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Conclusion: As candidate for Forward Township Supervisor, you
would become, if elected, a public official subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does
not prohibit a person with a criminal conviction from running as a
candidate for the office of second class township supervisor.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the
full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the
Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 513.2(h). The appeal may
be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States
mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within fifteen
(15) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Vincent J. Dop
Chief Counsel