HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-573 DeWallSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
June 20, 1994
Thomas H. DeWall
Executive Officer
Pennsylvania Psychological Association
416 Forster Street
Harrisburg, PA 17102 -1714
94 -573
Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); Senate; Research
Analyst.
Dear Mr. DeWall:
This responds to your letter of May 19, 1994, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any restrictions upon employment of a Research Analyst
following termination of service with the Senate.
Facts: Leigh Walter, who was a Research Analyst for Senator J.
Doyle Corman until late April (1994) has been hired by the
Pennsylvania Psychological Association. You inquire as to what
activities are prohibited on the part of Walter. Thus, you ask
whether she is prohibited from lobbying members of the State
Senate, members of the State Board of Psychology or any other
officials. You also ask whether she would be precluded from
attending fund raising events of incumbent candidates for the
General Assembly. Lastly, you inquire as to what prohibitions are
in effect and as to how long they will remain in effect.
Discussion: As a Research Analyst for Senator Corman, Leigh Walter
is to be considered a "public employee" within the definition of
that term as set forth in the Public Official and Employee Ethics
• Law and the Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa.-
Code 511.1. This conclusion is based upon the job description,
which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that
the power exists to take or recommend official action of a non -
ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement,
planning, inspecting, administering or monitoring grants, leasing,
regulating, auditing or other activities where the economic impact
is greater than de minimis on the interests of another person.
DeWall, Thomas H., 94 -573
June 20, 1994
Page 2
Consequently, upon termination of public service, Walter would
become a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the
Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the
Ethics Act provides that:
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(g) No former public official or public
employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter
before the governmental body with which he has
been associated for one year after he leaves
that body.
Initially, to answer your request the governmental body with
which she was associated while working with Senator Corman must be
identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated with
the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed.
The term governmental body with which a public official or
public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the
Ethics Law as follows:
•
Section 2. Definitions.
"Governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been
associated." The governmental body within
State government or a political subdivision
by which the public official or employee is or
has been employed or to which the public
official or employee is or has been appointed
or elected and subdivisions and offices within
that governmental body.
In applying the above definition to the instant matter, we
must conclude that the governmental body with which Walter was
associated upon termination of public service would be the Senate.
The above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the
legislative intent (Lectislative Journal of House 1989 Session, No.
15 at 290, 291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus,
in Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former
Division Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not
merely restricted to the particular Division as was contended but
was in fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year
representation restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R,
it was determined that a former legislative assistant to a state
senator was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to
the entire Senate as his former governmental body.
DeWall, Thomas H., 94 -573
June 20, 1994
Page 3
Therefore, within the first year after termination of service
with the Senate, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and
restrict representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the
Senate.
It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the
definition of the term "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the
specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so
that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official/
employee had influence or control but extended to the entire
governmental body with which the public official /employee was
associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the legislative
debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term:
We sought to make particularly clear that
when we are prohibiting for 1 year that
revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing
not only with a particular subdivision of an
agency or a local government but the entire
unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989
Session, No. 15 at 290, 291.
Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain
and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa.
C.S.A. 51901, it is clear that the governmental body with which
Walter was associated is the Senate.
Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section
3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before
agencies or entities other than with respect to the former
governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the
type of employment in which a person may engage, following
departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that
the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial
conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the
law generally is that during the term of a person's public
employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon
departure from the public sector, that individual should not be
allowed to utilize his association with the public sector,
officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer,
treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his
association with his former governmental body.
In respect to the one year restriction against such
"representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Represent." To act on behalf of any
DeWall, Thomas H., 94 -573
June 20, 1994
Page 4
other person in any activity which includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying
and submitting bid or contract proposals which
are signed by or contain the name of a former
public official or public employee.
The Commission, in Popovich,, Opinion 89 -005, has also
interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of
the Ethics Law to prohibit:
1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body
or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or
renegotiations in general or as to contracts;
2. Attempts to influence;
3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed
by or contain the name of the former public
official /employee;
4. Participating in any matters before the former
governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person;
5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any
person or employer before the former governmental body in
relation to legislation, regulations, etc.
The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the
person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal,
document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former
governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former
governmental body. In Shav,, Opinion 91 -012, the Commission held
that Section 3(g) would prohibit the inclusion of the name of a
former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his
new employer to the former governmental body, even though the
invoices pertained to a contract which existed prior to termination
of public service. Therefore, within the first year after
termination of service, Walter should not engage in the type of
activity outlined above.
Walter may assist in the preparation of any documents
presented to the Senate.' However, Walter may not be identified on
documents submitted to the Senate. Walter may also counsel any
person regarding that person's appearance before the Senate. Once
again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed
to the Senate. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not
prohibit or preclude the making of general informational inquiries
of the Senate to secure information which is available to the
general public. This must not be done in an effort to indirectly
DeWall, Thomas H., 94 -573
June 20, 1994
Page 5
influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known
to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer.
In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the
Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association,
firm, partnership, committee, club or other
organization or group of persons.
In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, the Commission held that
Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from
providing consulting services to his former governmental body for
a period of one year after termination of service in that the
prohibition against representing a person includes the former
public official /employee representing himself.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of
monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official
action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be
influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the
law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
As to other specific inquires you impose, Walter would be
prohibited from lobbying members of the State Senate but not
members of the State Board of Psychology in that the State Board of
Psychology is under the Department of State which is not the
governmental body of Walter. As to the question of whether Walter
would be prohibited from lobbying any other officials, the
prohibition extends to the entire governmental body which is the
entire Senate. As to the inquiry as to whether Walter would be
prohibited from attending fund raising events of incumbent
candidates for the General Assembly, Walter would not.be prohibited
from any action as to the House of Representatives; as to the
Sepate, although Walter would not be prohibited, she must insure
that her activity would not constitute representation as noted
above. Lastly, as to your last question as to how long the
prohibitions are in effect, said prohibition lasts for a period of
one year after termination of services.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
DeWall, Thomas H., 94 -573
June 20, 1994
Page 6
than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As Research Analyst, Leigh Walter is to be considered
a "public employee" as defined in the Ethics Law. Upon termination
of service with Senator Corman, Walter would become a "former
public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The
former governmental body is the entire Senate. The restrictions as
to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety
of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics
Law.
Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the
Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of Financial Interests be
filed for the year following termination of service.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received
at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery
service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such
an appeal at the Commission within fifteen (15) days may result in the
dismissal of the appeal.
cerely,
incent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel