Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-556-S PawlushDaryl Pawlush Chairman Conyngham Township Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 1 Mocanaqua, PA 18655 Dear Mr. Pawlush: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL June 2, 1994 Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: 94 -556S Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Private Employment or Business, Township, Supervisor, Sewer Project, Contract, Business with which Associated, Supervisor Working on Sewer Project, Supplemental Advice. This responds to your letter of April 22, 1994, in which you requested supplemental advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether a Second Class Township Supervisor is prohibited or restricted by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law from working with, being employed by or associated with a business in a private capacity in addition to public service where the business has a contract with the township as to a sewer project. Facts: By letter of March 21, 1994 you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission as to four factual scenarios or issues and on April 19, 1994, Advice of Counsel 94 -556 was issued which is incorporated herein by reference. You now inquire as to whether you may work on a sewer project as to which your firm has a contact with the Board of Supervisors. Your firm will charge the Township for the cost of your work, but you would abstain from voting on the bills. Discussion: As a Townshig Supervisor you are a public official as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that law. Pawlush, Daryl, 94 -556S June 2, 1994 Page 2 Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities• unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete Pawlush, Daryl, 94-556S June 2, 1994 Page 3 response to the question presented. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the instant matter, we note that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /employee may not use the authority of office for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A public official /employee must exercise caution so that his private business activities do not conflict with his public duties. Crisci, Opinion 89 -013. Thus, a public official /employee could not perform private business using governmental facilities or personnel. In particular, the governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, :research materials, personnel or any other property could not be used as a means, in whole or part, to carry out private business activities. In addition, the public official /employee could not during government working hours, solicit or promote such business activity. Pancoe, supra. Similarly, Section 3(a) would expressly prohibit the use of confidential information received by holding public office/ employment for such a prohibited private pecuniary benefit. In the event that your private employer or business has a matter pending before your governmental body or if you as part of such official duties must participate, review or pass upon that matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In those instances, it will be necessary that you be removed from that process. In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law would require not only that you abstain from participation but also file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes. In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following: 1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in a private capacity; 2. utilization of confidential information gained through public position; 3. participating in discussions, reviews, or recommendations on matters which relate to the business /private employer which may come before the governmental body and in such cases publicly announcing the relationship or advising the supervisor as well as filing a written memorandum as per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law. Brooks, Opinion 89 -023. Pawlush, Daryl, 94 -556S June 2, 1994 Page 4 Section 3. Restricted activities. (f) No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. In relation to the above provision of law, the State Ethics Commission has generally determined that this provision is a procedure to be used when a public official or employee contracts with his own governmental body in an amount of $500 or more. The process must be open and public with prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure. In addition, the public official/ employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Thus, the open and public process, must be used in all situations where a public official is otherwise appropriately contracting with his own governmental body in an amount of $500 or more. This open and public process would require: (1). prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility; (2) sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to be able to prepare and present an application or proposal; (3) public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered and; Pawlush, Daryl, 94 -556S June 2, 1994 Page 5 (4) public disclosure of the contract awarded and offered and accepted. Further, Section 3(f) requires that the public official could not have supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract. Parenthetically, although the contracting in question would not be prohibited under the Ethics Law provided the requirements of Sections 3(a), (f) and (j) are satisfied, a problem may exist as to such contracting under the respective code. In the instant situation, the Second Class Township Code provides as follows: (f) Except as herein provided, no township official, either elected or appointed, who knows, or who by the exercise of reasonable diligence, could know, shall be interested to any appreciable degree, either directly or indirectly, in any contract for the sale or furnishing of any supplies or materials for the use of the township, or for any work to be done for such township involving the expenditure by the township of more than three hundred dollars ($300) in any year, but this limitation shall not apply to cases where such officer, or appointee of the township, is an employee of the person, firm or corporation to which the money is to be paid in a capacity with no possible influence on the transaction, and in which he cannot be possibly benefited thereby, either financially or otherwise: Provided, however, That in the case of a supervisor, if he knows that he is within the exception just mentioned, he shall so inform the supervisors and shall refrain from voting on the expenditures, or any ordinance relating thereto, and shall in no manner participate therein: Provided, further, That any such official or appointee who shall knowingly violate .his provision shall be subject to surcharge to the extent of the damage shown to be thereby sustained by the township, ouster from office, and shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500): Provided, That in the case of the purchase of material for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and improvement of roads and bridges, the contract, which shall be in writing, and shall be let only on standard specifications of the Department of Transportation, and materials so purchased shall only be used in accordance with specifications of said department. 53 P.S. S65802(f). Since such contracting may be prohibited by the above quoted provision of the Code, but not under the Ethics Law, it is suggested that advice in that regard be sought from the municipal solicitor or from private counsel. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Second Class Township Code. Conclusion: A Second Class Township Supervisor is a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment /business activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as noted above. In the event that the employer /business has matters pending before your governmental body, then you could not participate in that matter and the disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as outlined above must be satisfied. Due to the possible application of the Second Class Township Code in this matter, it is suggested that advice be obtained from the municipal solicitor or private counsel in that regard. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. Pawlush, Daryl, 94 -556S June 2, 1994 Page 6 such. This letter is a public record and will be made available as Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Pawlush, Daryl, 94 -556S June 2, 1994 Page 7 Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within fifteen (15) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. incerely, } wt9 , /`/1 04 Vincent . Dopko Chief Counsel