HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-551 GrieneisenSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108.1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 14, 1994
Timothy M. Grieneisen
Sanitarian
Water Supply and Community Health
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
Knox District Office
White Memorial Building
Knox, PA 16232 94-551
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Sanitarian, Department of
Environmental Resources, Private Employment or Business, Board
of Director for Rails -to- Trails.
Dear Mr. Grieneisen:
This responds to your letter of March 24, 1994, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether a Sanitarian for the Department of Environmental
Resources is prohibited or restricted by the Public Official and
Employee Ethics Law from working with, being employed by or
associated with a business /person in a private capacity in addition
to public service.
Facts: You are currently employed as a Sanitarian with the Bureau
of Water Supply and Community Health of the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources, Northwest Regional Office. Your
official headquarters is the Knox District Office. Your duties
involve regulating public water systems, inspecting and licensing
public eating and drinking facilities, inspecting swimming pools,
inspecting public schools, and investigating complaints in regard
to the same.
You have been asked to serve on the Board of Directors for a
Rails -to- Trails group. They are organized to develop an abandoned
railroad from DuBois (Clearfield County) to Ridgeway (Elk County),
Pennsylvania. This group formed approximately two years ago has
made substantial progress toward this effort. As of the writing of
this memo you have yet to be involved in any of their activities;
however, you have been asked to serve on their Board of Directors.
Grieneisen, Timothy M., 94 -551
April 14, 1994
Page 2
You believe that Rails -to- Trails projects promote similar
goals of the Department and you personally perceive little
potential conflict relative to your duties. -
Accordingly, you are requesting an Advisory from the State
Ethics Commission as to whether there would be potential conflict
in your duties with a director of Rails -to- Trails which proposes to
develop this trail.
Discussion: As a Sanitarian for the Department of Environmental
Resources, you are a public employee as that term is defined under
the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that
law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
Grieneisen, Timothy M., 94 -551
April 14, 1994
Page 3
employment.
"Business with which he is associated."
Any business in which the person or a member
of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a
financial interest.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept anything . of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is
made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or
will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete
response to the question presented.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
instant matter, we note that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does
not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business
activities or employment; however, the public official /employee may
not use the. authority of office for the advancement of his own
private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is
associated. Pancoe Opinion 89 -011. A public official /employee
must exercise caution so that his private business activities do
not conflict with his public duties. Crisci, Opinion 89 -013.
Thus, a public official /employee could not perform private business
using governmental facilities or personnel. In particular, the
governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research
materials, personnel or any other property could not be used as a
means, in whole or part, to carry out private business activities.
In addition, the public official /employee could not during
government working hours, solicit or promote such business
activity. Pancoe, supra. Similarly, Section 3(a) would expressly
prohibit the use of confidential information received by holding
public office/ employment for such a prohibited private pecuniary
benefit.
In the event that your private employer or business has a
matter pending before your governmental body or if you as part of
such official duties must participate, review or pass upon that
matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In those
instances, it will be necessary that you be removed from that
process.
In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law
would require not only that you abstain from participation but also
file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording
the minutes or your supervisor.
Grieneisen, Timothy M., 94 -551
April 14, 1994
Page 4
In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following:
1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in
a private capacity;
2. utilization of confidential information gained through
public position;
3. participating in discussions, reviews, or recommendations
on matters which relate to the business /private employer
which may come before the governmental body and in such
cases publicly announcing the relationship or advising
the supervisor as well as filing a written memorandum as
per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law.
Brooks, Opinion 89 -023.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code,
ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the
Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an
interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed
herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct or
the Civil Service Act.
Conclusion: As a Sanitarian for the Department of Environmental
Resources, you are a public employee subject to the provisions of
the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude
you from outside employment /business activity subject to the
restrictions and qualifications as noted above. In the event that
the employer /business has matters pending before your governmental
body, then you could not participate in that matter and the
disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as
outlined above must be satisfied. Lastly, the propriety of the
proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Grieneisen, Timothy M., 94 -551
April 14, 1994
Page 5
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received
at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery
service, or by FAX transmission (717 -787- 0806).
cerely,
Vincent Dop
Chief Co sel