HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-537 KellyCharles G. Kelly
P.O. Box 306
Wampum, PA 16157
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 1, 1994
94 - 537
Member, Borough
on Bills Including
Re: Simultaneous Service, Borough Council
Employee, Use of Authority Office, Vote
Wages as Employee.
Dear Mr. Kelly:
This responds to your letter of February 28, 1994, in which
you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law-imposes
any prohibition or restrictions upon a Borough Council Member from
also serving or being employed as a Borough Employee and voting on
bills which include his wages as an employee.
Facts: You are a Member of Borough Council. You are also a Borough
employee. At the February Council meeting, you were approached by
the Solicitor who advised you of a possible conflict of interest
concerning your voting on bills. You state that he told you that
you should abstain from voting to pay the bills because your wages,
as a Borough employee, are listed on the bills. The Solicitor also
stated that the reason he believes you have a conflict is because
of the overtime hours, which were the result of winter snow
removal. You are responsible for the overtime hours of two
employees during the winter, one of which is yourself. You
questioned this advice since all Council Members are compensated
and they vote on the bills.
You state that you have been operating in this manner for 17
years, pursuant to instruction by Council, and you feel that it is
already an established policy, similar to set wages.
Based upon the above, you request an advisory from the State
Ethics Commission.
Discussion: As a Member of Borough Council, you are a "public
official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Law and hence you
Kelly, Charles G., 94 -537
April 1, 1994
Page 2
are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. 65 P.S. S402; 51
Pa. Code S11.1.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined under the Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
any thing of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby.
Kelly, Charles G., 94 -537
April 1, 1994
Page 3
Section 3. Restricted activities
(j) Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of
Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation,
order or ordinance, the following procedure
shall be employed. Any public official or
public employee who in the discharge of his
official duties would be required to vote on a
matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior
to the vote being taken, publicly announce and
disclose the nature of his interest, as a
public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting at which the vote is
taken, provided that whenever a governing body
would be unable to take any action on a matter
before it because the number of members of the
body required to abstain from voting under the
provisions of this section makes the majority
or other legally required vote of approval
unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as
otherwise provided herein. In the case of a
three - member governing body of a political
subdivision, where one member has abstained
from voting as a result of a conflict of
interest, and the remaining two members of the
governing body have cast opposing votes, the
member who has abstained shall be permitted to
vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is
made as otherwise provided herein.
65 P.S. S403(j).
If a conflict exists, Section 3(j) requires the public
official /employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the
abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a
written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the
minutes or supervisor.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
question of simultaneous service, there does not appear to be any
real possibility of a private pecuniary benefit or inherent
conflict arising if you were to serve both as a public
official /employee and as a Borough Employee. Basically, the Ethics
Law does not state that it is inherently incompatible for a public
official /employee to serve or be employed as a borough employee.
The main prohibition under the Ethics Law and Opinions of the
Kelly, Charles G., 94 -537
April 1, 1994
Page 4
Ethics Commission is that you may not serve the interests of two
persons, groups, or entities whose interests may be inherently
adverse or act in any manner whereby you are using your public
office for your private pecuniary benefit. For example, in this
case, it would be contrary to the Ethics Law for you, as Borough
Council Member, to use your office in such a way that you would be
creating more overtime hours for you as a Borough employee which
would result in your receiving additional compensation as Borough
employee. Deitrick, Opinion 89 -022 and Smith Opinion, 89-010. In
the situation outlined above, since you are the Council Member
responsible for your own overtime, you are using your position of
public office for the receipt of a private pecuniary-benefit; that
being overtime hours. It is necessary that you remove yourself
from this process so as to avoid a conflict of interest.
Turning to the question of voting on bills which include your
wages as Borough employee, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law prohibits
a public official /public employee from using the authority of
public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding such a public' position for the private pecuniary benefit of
the public official /public employee himself, a member of his
immediate family a •business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. Thus, it is clear that you would
have a conflict of interest as to any matter 'before you in your
capacity as a Borough Council Member involving: your own hiring,
continued employment, and compensation as borough employee. You
would be prohibited by the Ethics Law from voting on bills which
included your wages as a Borough employee. In each instance of a
conflict of interest, you would be required to fully abstain and to
publicly announce and disclose your abstention and the reasons for
same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to thee
appropriate person (supervisor or secretary who keeps the minutes).
If such a situation would arise additional advice may be sought
from the commission .
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not
addressed is the applicability of the Borough Code.
Conclusion: As a Member of Borough Council, you are a "public
official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. The Ethics
Law does not prohibit your simultaneous service as a Borough
Council Member and Borough employee. Section 3(a) of the Ethics
Law would prohibit you from using your position to receive a
private pecuniary benefit by setting your own working hours as a
Borough employee; the Ethics Law requires your removal from such
function of determining your own working hours and the substitution
Kelly, Charles G., 94 -537
April 1, 1994
Page 5
of some other Council Member for that function. In addition, you
may not vote on the approval of your wages Further, in your
capacity as a Borough Council Member, Section 3(j) must be followed
as to any conflict of interest as set forth above. Lastly, the
propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received
at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery
service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
� Si cerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel