HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-629 RoadcapDebra Roadcap
37 Graeff Street
Cressona, PA 17929
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 30, 1993
93 -629
Re: Simultaneous Service, Borough Mayor and Employee of Borough
Authority.
Dear Ms. Roadcap:
This responds to your letter of November 23, 1993, and the
letters of Solicitor Thomas J. Nickels dated November 15, 1993 and
November 22, 1993, in which you requested advice from the State
Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law imposes
any prohibition or restrictions upon a borough mayor from also
being employed by the borough authority.
Facts: You have been an employee of the Cressona Borough Authority
( "Authority "), Schuylkill County, since August 29, 1988. The.
Authority is a working sewer authority and a separate entity
created under the Municipalities Authorities Act of 1945. You were
hired as a clerk /secretary. Your wages and benefits are set by the
Authority. You work for the Authority approximately 30 hours per
week. You have submitted copies of minutes of the Authority
regarding your employment, hours, salary, and benefits and these
documents are incorporated herein by reference.
In 1989, the Authority purchased a computer and you are the
individual who does the computer work. Thereafter, the Authority
was approached by Cressona Borough ( "Borough ") regarding including
the Borough's sanitation billing with the Authority's sewer bills.
An agreement was entered into for compensation for this service.
In lieu of paying the Authority a large fee for computer time, the
agreement calls for the Borough to reimburse the Authority for the
time you spend doing the Borough sanitation billing work. The rate
of reimbursement paid to the Authority by the Borough is your
actual wage for the time spent doing sanitation billing, which wage
is set by the Authority. The sanitation billing work takes
approximately two to ten hours per week and is the only work the
Authority does for the Borough.
Debra Roadcap
December 30, 1993
Page 2
On November 2, 1993, you were elected Mayor of Cressona
Borough, a community with a population of less than 1700. This
position pays a monthly Mayor's salary of $100.00. A question has
been raised not as to the issue of you serving in both positions
simultaneously but whether you may receive the Mayor's salary.
You state that you are aware that Section 1104 of the Borough
Code regarding appointments and incompatible offices. You indicate
that your position with the Authority is not an elected position.
Further, you are not the Borough Secretary, Treasurer or Manager.
You state that you are not a "Borough Clerk" and the Borough has no
jurisdiction over your wages or benefits. Your only supervisors
are the five Authority members. You make this distinction
specifically in response to the letters from Mr. Nickels because in
his letters requesting advice on this matter, he calls you a
"Borough Clerk ". Accordingly, you wrote to request advice on your
own behalf clarifying Mr. Nickels' letter and supplying additional
facts and details.
Based upon the above, you request an advisory from the State
Ethics Commission as to whether you may collect the $100.00 per
month Mayor's salary.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 7(10)
and 7(11) of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. § §407(10), (11), advisories
are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the
requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the
facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not
engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it
speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the
burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the materials
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 P.S. § §407(10), (11). An
advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has
truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
As Mayor for Cressona, Schuylkill County, you are a "public
official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Law and hence (5)
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa.
Code S11.1.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined under the Ethics Law:
Debra Roadcap
December 30, 1993
Page 3
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
any thing of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby.
Further, it is noted that it is expressly assumed that in fact
the Authority and the Borough are separate, distinct governmental
bodies.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
question of simultaneous service, there does not appear to be any
real possibility of a private pecuniary benefit or inherent
conflict arising if you were to serve both as a public official/
employee and as an employee of the Authority. Basically, the
Ethics Law does not state that it is inherently incompatible for a
public official /employee to serve or be employed as an employee of
a borough authority. The main prohibition under the Ethics Law and
Opinions of the Ethics Commission is that you may not serve the
interests of two persons, groups, or entities whose interests may
be inherently adverse or act in any manner whereby you are using
Debra Roadcap
December 30, 1993
Page 4
your public office for your private pecuniary benefit. For
example, it would be contrary to the Ethics Law if you, as Mayor of
Cressona Borough, would use your office in such a way that you
would be creating more work for you to do as an Authority employee
which would result in your receiving additional compensation as an
Authority employee. Assuming that there is no such action on your
part, you may, consistent with the Ethics Law, serve as Mayor of
the Borough and receive the monthly Mayor's salary. Deitrick,
Opinion No. 89 -022.
Turning to the question of conflict of interest, pursuant to
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law, a public official /public employee
is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment
or confidential information received by holding such a public
position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/
public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated. Should a situation arise where the use of authority of
public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding the above public positions could result in a prohibited
private pecuniary benefit, a conflict of interest would exist.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be
required to fully abstain and to publicly announce and disclose the
abstention and the reasons for same in a written memorandum filed
with the appropriate person (supervisor or secretary who keeps the
minutes). If such a situation would arise, additional advice may
be sought from the Commission.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As Mayor of Cressona Borough, you are a "public
official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. As a public
official /employee, you may, consistent with Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Law, simultaneously serve in the positions of Mayor and
Authority employee and receive the Mayor's salary, subject to the
restrictions, conditions and qualifications set forth above.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only
been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
Debra Roadcap
December 30, 1993
Page 5
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of
this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
Ipcerely,
Vincent . Dopko
Chief Counsel
cy4,