HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-625 BoyerRosemary T. Boyer
220 West Boyer Street
Williamstown, PA 17098 -1501
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG. PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 28, 1993
93 -625
Re: Simultaneous Service, Member and Secretary of Borough
Authority, Employee of Borough, Secretary /Treasurer.
Dear Ms. Boyer:
This responds to your letter of October 30, 1993, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law imposes
any prohibition or restrictions upon a member and secretary of a
borough authority from also being employed by the borough.
Facts: By letter dated October 30, 1993, you requested an
advisory from this Commission. On December 1, 1993, you contacted
the Assistant Counsel for this Commission by telephone and
clarified various facts related to your request and such
conversation is incorporated herein.
You have been a Member and Secretary of the Williamstown
Borough Authority ( "Borough Authority ") since 1978. At the time of
your appointment to the Borough Authority, you were unemployed.
Shortly after your appointment, you accepted a position with
Miner's National Bank of Pottsville, Williamstown Branch. In 1983,
you left the bank for employment with the SPCC in Mechanicsburg.
The Borough Authority is a separate governmental body created
pursuant to the Municipalities Authorities Act of 1945 and operates
the water system for Williamstown Borough ( "Borough ") and Williams
Township. There also exists a Williamstown Sewer Authority ( "Sewer
Authority") which is another separate governmental body created
pursuant to the Municipalities Authorities Act of 1945. The Sewer
Authority is not an operating authority, but is merely a
"financial" authority. The Sewer Authority owns the property but
through a leaseback agreement, the Borough operates the sewer plant
and the individuals working at the plant are Borough employees.
You stated in your telephone conference that you are the "recording
Rosemary T. Boyer
December 28, 1993
Page 2
secretary" for the Sewer Authority whereby you attend the meetings,
take minutes and do other errands on a non - compensated, voluntary
basis.
In 1985, the Borough, the Borough Authority and the Sewer
Authority created a position and opened one central office for the
administration of all activities. Previously, all secretarial and
bookkeeping activities were done at three separate locations. You
applied for and, after being interviewed by an impartial committee,
you were offered the position. In your subsequent telephone
conference, you indicated that this position is that of Borough
Secretary /Treasurer. In this position as a Borough employee, you
do some clerical work for the Borough Authority and the Borough
Authority pays the Borough for your services. You are not,
however, an employee of the Borough Authority.
You state that at the time you took the position of Borough
Secretary /Treasurer, it was questioned by several Borough Council
Members whether you could serve in both positions and it was agreed
that you could so serve with the understanding that your position
as a Member of the Borough Authority would not interfere with your
duties as a Borough employee. In December, 1989, you were
nominated and unanimously appointed to another term on the Borough
Authority.
You state that your status is again being questioned. You
state that neither the Borough Solicitor nor the Authority
Solicitor have ever expressed any opinions regarding this matter.
You refer to the Borough Code, Section 1104. Appointments:
Incompatible Offices and have enclosed a copy of that section which
is incorporated herein by reference. You indicate that since 1985,
you have diligently endeavored to keep separate your position with
the Borough Authority from your position with the Borough. After
questioning the motives of those who suggest a conflict may exist,
you seek an advisory from the State Ethics Commission regarding
your continued service with the Borough Authority and the Borough.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 7(10)
and 7(11) of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. 5§407(10), (11), advisories
are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the
requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the
facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not
engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it
speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the
burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the materials
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 P.S. §S407(10), (11). An
advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has
truthfully disclosed all of the material facts.
Rosemary T. Boyer
December 28, 1993
Page 3
As a Member of the Williamstown Borough Authority, you are a
"public official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Law and
hence you are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. 65 P.S.
S402; 51 Pa. Code S11.1. As a Secretary /Treasurer for Williamstown
Borough, you are a "public employee" subject to the provisions of
the Ethics Law in that position as well.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined under the Ethics Law:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of the
authority of his office or employment or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office or employment for the
private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member
of his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of
interest" does not include an action having a
de minimis economic impact or which affects to
the same degree a class consisting of the
general public or a subclass consisting of an
industry, occupation or other group which
includes the public official or public
employee, a member of his immediate family or
a business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of
which is necessary to the performance of
duties and responsibilities unique to a
particular public office or position of public
employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law-provide
in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
any thing of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the
Rosemary T. Boyer
December 28, 1993
Page 4
public official /employee would be influenced thereby.
Further, it is noted that it is expressly assumed that in fact
Williamstown Borough and the Williamstown Borough Authority are
separate, distinct governmental bodies.
Further, it is expressly assumed that you did not use your
position as Borough Authority Member to obtain the position of
Borough Secretary /Treasurer. This assumption is based on your
factual statements that you were offered the position after an
impartial committee interviewed several candidates, including
yourself. It is noted that the Ethics Law prohibits anyone from
using authority of office or confidential information to advance
his or her selection for a position or to eliminate any competitors
for that position. Pepper, Opinion No. 87 -008.
In applying the Ethics Law to this case, it is noted that your
work with the Sewer Authority would not be prohibited. You are not
compensated by the Sewer Authority and you serve on a volunteer
basis. You are not an official or employee of the Sewer Authority
and there is no obligation on your part whatsoever to serve or
perform any function for the Sewer Authority. Accordingly, there
would not be any conflict of interest as a result of your activity
with the Sewer Authority.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
question of simultaneous service, there does not appear to be any
inherent conflict arising if you were to serve both as a public
official in the capacity of a Member of the Borough Authority and
as a public employee in the capacity of Borough Secretary/
Treasurer. Basically, the Ethics Law does not state that it is
inherently incompatible for a public official /employee to serve or
be employed as a Borough Authority Member and a Borough employee.
The main prohibition under the Ethics Law and Opinions of the
Ethics Commission is that one may not serve the interests of two
persons, groups, or entities whose interests may be inherently
adverse or act in any manner whereby you are using your public
office for your private pecuniary benefit. For example, it would
be contrary to the Ethics Law if you, as a Member of the Borough
Authority, would use office in such a way that you would be
creating more work for you to do as Borough Secretary /Treasurer for
the Borough Authority which would result in your receiving
additional compensation as a Borough employee.
Turning to the question of conflict of interest, pursuant to
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law, a public official /public employee
is prohibited from using the authority of public office /employment
or confidential information received by holding such a public
position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/
public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
Rosemary T. Boyer
December 28, 1993
Page 5
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is
associated. Should a situation arise where the use of authority of
public office /employment or confidential information received by
holding the above public positions could result in a prohibited
private pecuniary benefit, a conflict of interest would arise.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, you would be
required to fully abstain and to publicly announce and disclose the
abstention and the reasons for same in a written memorandum filed
with the appropriate person (supervisor or secretary who keeps the
minutes). If such a situation would arise, additional advice may
be sought from the Commission.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other
than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As a Member of the Williamstown Borough Authority, you
are a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics
Law. As a Secretary /Treasurer of the Williamstown Borough, you are
a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law in
that position also. As a public official /employee, you may,
consistent with Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law, simultaneously
serve in the positions of Authority Member and Borough employee,
subject to the restrictions, conditions and qualifications set
forth above. Similarly, there is no prohibition from continuing
your service upon the Williamstown Sewer Authority. Lastly, the
propriety of the proposed course of conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually
received at the Commission within fifteen (15) days of the date of this
Rosemary T. Boyer
December 28, 1993
Page 6
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa.Code §13.2(h). The appeal may be received
at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery
service, or by FAX transmission (717- 787 - 0806).
ry truly yours,
wujl()
Vincent J. Dopko,
Chief Counsel