Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-594 WilsonJames B. Wilson, P.E. Special Assistant to the Executive Director Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission P.O. Box 8531 Harrisburg, PA 17105 Dear Mr. Wilson: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL September 3, 1993 93 -594 Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Associate Executive Director, Chief Engineer, Secretary /Treasurer, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Special Assistant to the Executive Director, Contracting, Business with which Associated, Independent Consultant, Executive -Level State Employee, Section 3(i), Former Public Employee, Section 3(g). This responds to your letters of July 29, 1993 and August 5, 1993 in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether a Special Assistant to the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and former Associate Executive Director, Chief Engineer and Secretary /Treasurer is prohibited or restricted by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law from working with, being employed by or associated with a business /person in a private capacity in addition to public service; whether such individual or a business with which he is associated under the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law may engage in contracting with the Turnpike Commission; and whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law presents any restrictions upon employment of such individual following termination of service with the Turnpike Commission. Facts: You served as Associate Executive Director and Chief Engineer for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. You also served as Secretary /Treasurer of the Turnpike Commission. You took early retirement on June 30, 1993. Subsequently, you were asked by the Turnpike Commission to return as an employee under the 95 -day return provision. You indicated that you would serve the Turnpike Commission until replacements were selected for your positions. After replacements are found, you will remain with the Commission Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 2 as Special Assistant to the Executive Director for the balance of the 95 days, serving on specifically designated projects such as the Mon /Fayette Transportation Project, the Southern Beltway Project and the I -95 Interchange Project. Further, you have been approached by Syntonic Technology, Inc. ( Syntonic) to work as an independent consultant on several out -of- state projects. These five (5) projects are detailed in your letter and are incorporated herein by reference. None of the projects on which you will be working involve work within Pennsylvania; however, Syntonic does presently have contracts with the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. You state that while there is no job description for your duties as Secretary /Treasurer, you indicate that it is an elective office which maintains all Turnpike Commission records and processes all Turnpike Commission payments. Likewise, there is no job description for the position of Associate Executive Director, but you have submitted a job description for the Deputy Executive Director - Engineering and Chief Engineer and a Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission organizational chart, which are also incorporated herein by reference. Subsequently, by letter dated August 5, 1993, you informed this Commission that as of August 3, 1993 the position of Associate Executive Director has been eliminated; the position of Deputy Executive Director, Chief Engineer, and Secretary /Treasurer have been filled; and you are now serving as Special Assistant to the Executive Director. Based upon the above, you request an advisory from the State Ethics Commission regarding any possible violations of the Ethics Law in connection with your proposed activities. Discussion: Initially, it is expressly assumed that factually, during the 95 days that you will be working for the Turnpike Commission as Special Assistant to the Executive Director, you are a "public employee" within the definition of that term as set forth in the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law and the Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §4 02; 51 Pa. Code §11.1. Further, as an Associate Executive Director, Chief Engineer and Secretary /Treasurer for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, you were a "public employee ". This conclusion is based upon the job descriptions, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the powers exist to take or recommend official actions of a non - ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning, inspecting, administering or monitoring grants, leasing, regulating, auditing or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on the interests of other persons. Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 3 You also are an executive -level state employee as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the requirements of Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, infra. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Executive -level State employee." The Governor, Lieutenant Governor, cabinet members, deputy secretaries, the Governor's office staff, any State employee with discretionary powers which may affect the outcome of a State agency's decision in relation to a private corporation or business or any employee who by virtue of his job Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 4 65 P.S. 5402. function could influence the outcome of such a decision. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. "Contract" shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the question of your association with Syntonic, it is noted that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /employee may not use the authority of office for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A public official /employee must exercise caution so that his private business activities do not conflict with his public duties. Crisci, Opinion 89 -013. Thus, a public official /employee could not perform private business using governmental facilities or personnel. In particular, the governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, personnel or any other Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 5 property could not be used as a means, in whole or part, to carry out private business activities. In addition, the public official /employee could not during government working hours solicit or promote such business activity. Pancoe, supra. Similarly, Section 3(a) would expressly prohibit the use of confidential information received by holding public office/ employment for such a prohibited private pecuniary benefit. In the event that your private employer or business has a matter pending before your governmental body or if you as part of such official duties must participate, review or pass upon that matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In those instances, it will be necessary that you be removed from that process. In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law would require not only that you abstain from participation but also file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or your supervisor. In summary, the Ethics Law would require not only that you abstain from participation but also file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or you supervisor. In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following: 1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in a private capacity; 2. utilization of confidential information gained through public position; 3. participating in discussions, reviews, or recommendations on matters which relate to the business /private employer which may come before the governmental body and in such cases publicly announcing the relationship or advising the supervisor as well as filing a written memorandum as per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law. Brooks, Opinion 89 -023. As to your statement that Syntonic currently has contracts with the Turnpike Commission, Section 3(a) would not prohibit the continuation of such contracts or the awarding of new contracts; however, the contracting restrictions as to public officials /employees must be followed. Section 3(f) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted activities. Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 6 (f) No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. Section 3(f) has strict requirements whenever a public official /employee or the business with which he is associated contracts with the governmental body with which he is associated. The term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" is defined as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. Under the above quoted definition, it is clear that the governmental body with which you are associated is the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, in its entirety. Accordingly, under Section Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 7 3(f) of the Ethics Law, any contract that you or the business with which you are associated would negotiate with the governmental body would have to be awarded through an open and public process including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure if the contract is $500.00 or more as per the requirements of Section 3(f). In addition, Section 3(f) also restricts the award of sub- contracts. Thus, if the governmental body entered into a contract with a given individual or entity who in turn sought to enter into a sub - contract with you, or the business with which you are associated, such contracting would also be subject to the requirements of Section 3(f) of the Ethics Law noted above. Finally, if you or the business with which you are associated enters into such a contract or sub - contract after complying with the restrictions of Section 3(f), you would be prohibited from the implementation, administration or supervision of that contract in the capacity of a public official /employee. Therefore, in order for contracting to be allowed under the Ethics Law, strict compliance with the provisions of Section 3(f) of the Ethics Law as outlined above must be followed. Unless the restrictions of Section 3(f) of the Ethics Law are complied with, such contracting would be prohibited. The issue of the scope of permissible interaction with Syntonic and the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission once you terminate your position as Special Assistant to the Executive Director will now be discussed. Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities (i) No former executive -level State employee may for a period of two years from the time that he terminates his State employment be employed by, receive compensation from, assist or act in a representative capacity for a business or corporation that he actively participates in recruiting to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or that he actively participated in inducing to open a new plant, facility or branch in the Commonwealth or that he actively participated in inducing to expand an existent plant or facility within the Commonwealth, provided that the above prohibition shall be invoked only when the recruitment or inducement is accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth to the business or corporation recruited or induced to expand. Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 8 As to Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you are subject to that provision of law since you are an executive -level state employee. However, Section 3(i) would not restrict you from a position of employment with Syntonic provided you did not actively participate in recruiting or inducing that company to open a new facility or branch in the Commonwealth or participate in inducing it to expand an existing plant or facility that was accomplished by a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Syntonic. The facts do not indicate that you actively participated in recruiting or inducing Syntonic to open a new facility or branch or expand through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth. Conditioned upon the assumption that there has been no active participation by you in such recruitment or inducement of Syntonic to open or expand a facility or branch through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, you would not be prohibited from accepting the position of employment with Syntonic. In addition to the restrictions of Section 3(i), upon termination of public service, you would become a "former public official" subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (g) No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. The governmental body with which you are associated has already been identified above, but will be discussed in further detail. Then the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation" will be reviewed. In applying the term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" to this issue, the determination that your governmental body is the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, in its entirety, is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former Division Director of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) was not merely restricted to the Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 9 particular Division as was contended but was in fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90- 009 -R, it was determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the entire Senate as his former governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service with the Turnpike Commission, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict representation of persons or new employers vis- a-vis the Turnpike Commission. It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the definition of the term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official /employee had .influence or control but extended to the entire governmental body with which the public official /employee was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the legislative debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term: We sought to make particularly clear that when we are prohibiting for 1 year that revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing not only with a particular subdivision of an agency or a local government but the entire unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291. Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa. C.S.A. 51901, it is clear that the governmental body with which you are associated is the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section 3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the former governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which a person may engage, following departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 10 association with his former governmental body. In respect to the one year restriction against such "representation," the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. The Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations in general or as to contracts; 2. Attempts to influence; 3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official /employee; 4. Participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; 5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the former governmental body in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. In Shay, Opinion 91 -012, the Commission held that Section 3(g) would prohibit the inclusion of the name of a former public official /public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental body, even though the invoices pertained to a contract which existed prior to termination of public service. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. You may assist in the preparation of any documents presented to the Turnpike Commission. However, you may not be identified on Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 11 documents submitted to the Turnpike Commission. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before the Turnpike Commission. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the Turnpike Commission. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general informational inquiries of the Turnpike Commission to secure information which is available to the general public. This must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for, the new employer. In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the Ethics Law: Section 2. Definitions. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. In Confidential Opinion 93 -005, the Commission held that Section 3(g) precludes a former public official /employee from providing consulting services to his former governmental body for a period of one year after termination of service in that the prohibition against representing a person includes the former public official /employee representing himself. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Conclusion: As Associate Executive Director, Chief Engineer and Secretary /Treasurer for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, you were a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. As a Special Assistant to the Executive Director for the Turnpike Commission, you are a public official /employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment /business activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as noted above. In the event that the employer /business has matters pending before your governmental body, then you could not participate in that matter and the disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as outlined above must be satisfied. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you or a business with which you are associated from contracting with the Turnpike Commission, but you could not use the authority of office Wilson, 93 -594 September 3, 1993 Page 12 to obtain such business and such business activity may not be conducted using governmental facilities or personnel. Under Section 3(f) of the Ethics Law any contract or sub - contract between you or the business with which you are associated and your governmental body must be awarded through an open and public process, if valued at $500.00 or more, with prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure. In addition, if a contract is awarded, a public official /employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Upon termination of service with the Turnpike Commission, you will become a "former public official" subject to Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law. The former governmental body is the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, in its entirety. The restrictions as to representation outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. You are also considered an executive -level state employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Under Section 3(i) of the Ethics Law, you would not be prohibited from accepting a position of employment with Syntonic Technology, Inc. based upon the assumption that you did not actively participate in inducing or recruiting said company to open or expand a facility or branch through a grant or loan of money or a promise of a grant or loan of money from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Further, when service is terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed for the year following termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. such. This letter is a public record and will be made available as Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code S13.2(h). Sincerely, `7" Vincent J. Dopko Chief Counsel