Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-591 ConfidentialSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION 309 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL August 20, 1993 93 -591 Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, A, Division B, Department C, New Employment, Program Manager, Program D. This responds to your letter of July 13, 1993 in which you requested confidential advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law presents any prohibition or restrictions upon A of Division B of Department C with regard to prospective employment as a Program Manager of Program D. Facts: You are currently employed by Department C and are A of Division B. In your present position you serve as the Department's representative to the various programs established under Act E. Under this Act, Department C is required to provide personnel, staff, legal counsel, and office facilities to Board F as required for the administration and enforcement of programs. In your current position, you interact on a daily basis with these programs to assure that the Department's obligations are met. There is a position available with Program D for program manager. You would like to apply for this position. Based upon the above, you have requested a confidential advice as to whether you may apply for and serve in the position of Program Manager. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 7(10) and 7(11) of the Ethics Law, 65 P.S. SS407(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requestor based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts which the requestor has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts which have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requestor to truthfully disclose all of the materials August 20, 1993 Page 2 facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 P.S. §S407(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requestor has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As A of Division B for Department C, you are a public employee as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that law. Sections 3(a) and 3(g) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (g) No former public official or public employee shall represent a person, with promised or actual compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of August 20, 1993 Page 3 duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Governmental body." Any department, authority, commission, committee, council, board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, administration, legislative body, or other establishment in the Executive, Legislative or Judicial Branch of a State, a nation, or a political subdivision thereof or any agency performing a governmental function. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: Personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law provides as follows: Section 3. Restricted activities. (j) Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee, who in the discharge of his official duties, would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior August 20, 1993 Page 4 to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three - member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest, and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. If a conflict exists, Section 3(j) requires the public official /employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or supervisor. In the event that the required abstention results in the inability of the governmental body to take action because a majority is unattainable due to the abstention(s) from conflict under the Ethics Law, then in that event participation is permissible provided the disclosure requirements noted above are followed. See, Mlakar, Advice 91- 523 -S. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the circumstances which you have submitted, pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law, a public official /public employee is prohibited August 20, 1993 Page 5 from using the authority of public office /employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position from the private pecuniary benefit of the public official /public employee himself, any member of his immediate family is associated. Although Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from being considered or hired for the position of Program Manager for Program D while you are A of Division B it would prohibit you from using confidential information or the authority of office to advance your own selection or to eliminate any competitors for that position. Thus, while you may apply for that position, submit your resume and present qualifications in an interview pursuant thereto while serving as A of Division B you could not use the authority of your public office as a means in whole or part to promote your employment or conversely to eliminate any competitors for the position. Pepper, Opinion No. 87 -008. Subject to the qualification as noted above, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not prohibit your prospective employment as Program manager for Program D. See, Boonin, Opinion No. 90 -003. In addition to the applicability of Section 3(a) as stated above, in determining whether the Ethics Law would restrict you in the position of Program Manager of Program D, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law must be reviewed. Regarding the applicability of Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law, the question us is whether your resignation as a public official from Division B contemporaneously with your appointment as Program Manager of Program D would classify you as a former public official /employee in light of your resignation. Before addressing the above question, your governmental body must be identified. In applying the definition set forth above to the instant matter, it must be concluded that Department C is your governmental body. Further, the nature of Board F must be identified. The Board is created pursuant to Act E. As a creation of that Act, the Board F is a governmental body, although, pursuant to the Act, it is separate and independent from the Department C. Since Department C is your governmental body and since you are resigning from a position within that body to accept another appointed position of public employment, does such action categorize you as a former public official /employee? In this case, the actions on your part would constitute a transfer from one position of public service within one governmental body to a new position of public service within another governmental body. Therefore, you would not become a former public official /employee because you would continue under the rubric of public service subject to the controls of your governmental employer. August 20, 1993 Page 6 The Advice in this case is limited to these unique circumstances and certainly would not have application to situations where a public official /employee would terminate service with . this governmental body and seek to provide services as an independent contractor, consultant, or in some capacity, other than remaining as an employee or an official within' that governmental body. Boonin, supra and Confidential Opinion, 93 -005. Accordingly, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would not restrict your appointment as Program Manager with Program D. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct. Conclusion: As A of Division B for Department C, you are a public employee subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Although Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from being considered or hired for the position of Program Manager for Program D while serving as A of Division B, Section 3(a) would prohibit you from using the authority of office or confidential information as a means of promoting such prospective employment or eliminating competitors. Further, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would not prohibit you from resigning from one position of public service within Department C and accepting another position of public service with another governmental body. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. such. This letter is a public record and will be made available as August 20, 1993 Page 7 Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writinct and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 513.2(h). Sincerely, Vincent J. Dop Chief Counsel 4.f