HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-554 StaudtPHONE: 717-783-1610
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
FINANCE BUILDING
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 20, 2019
To the Requester:
Mr. Randall L. Staudt, P.E.
Dear Mr. Staudt:
FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
19-554
This responds to your letters dated November 4, 2019, and November 19, 2019,
by which you requested an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission
("Commission").
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65
P—a.177S. § 1101 et seg., would impose restrictions upon employment of an Assistant
Highway District Engineer following termination of employment with the Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation ("PennDOT").
Facts: You request an advisory from the Commission regarding the post-
empryment restrictions of the Ethics Act. You have submitted facts that may be fairly
summarized as follows.
On April 13, 2019, you retired from your employment as an Assistant Highway
District Engineer with PennDOT In Engineering District 8-0, in which capacity you
served as an Assistant District Executive for Construction. You have submitted a copy
of your official Commonwealth position description, which document is incorporated
herein by reference. A copy of the job classification specifications for the position of
Assistant Highway District Engineer (lob code 11710) has been obtained and is also
incorporated herein by reference.
You state that in your former Commonwealth position, you were responsible for
the selection of consultant engineering firms to provide construction inspection services
for Engineering District 8-0.
You are currently employed with a consulting engineering firm named W
Consultants, Inc." (the ""T
Firm"), which provides construction inspection services to
PennDOT and Engineering District 8-0. PennDOT provides Group Training
Conferences that are open to all consultant companies and construction contractors.
You state that if you would attend a Group Training Conference, it would be for the sole
purpose of receiving training in a group environment. You further state that your
attendance at a Group Training Conference would not involve one-on-one contact with
PennDOT for the purpose of conducting business.
Staudt, 19-554
member 20, 2019
Page 2
You seek guidance as to whether the Ethics Act would impose prohibitions or
restrictions upon you following termination of your Commonwealth employment. In
particular, you ask whether the Ethics Act would permit you to attend any Group
Training Conference(s) provided by PennDOT to consultant companies and
construction contractors.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11)
of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 110700}, (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully discllosed all of the material facts.
In the former capacity as an Assistant Highway District Engineer for PennDOT,
you would be considered a "public employee subject to the Ethics Act and the
Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code §
11.1, Andrews, Advice 19-531; Karr, Advice -554; McGee, Advice 16-513. This
conclusion based upon the position description and the job classification
specifications, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicate clearly that the
power exists to take or recommend official action of a non -ministerial nature with
respect to one or more of the following: contracting; procurement; administering or
monitoring grants or subsidies; planning or zoning; inspecting; licensing; regulating;
auditing; or other activity(ies) where the economic impact is greater than de minimis on
the interests of another person.
Consequently, upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you became
a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act.
While Section 1103O does not prohibit a former public official/public employee
from accepting a position of employment, it does restrict the former public official/public
employee with regard to "representing" a "person" before "the governmental body with
which he has been associated":
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(g) Former official or employee. --No former public
official or public employee shall represent a person, with
promised or actual compensation, on any matter b fe "ore the
governmental bod with which he has been associated for
one year after he leaves that body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(g) (Emphasis added).
The terms "represent," "person," and "governmental body with which a public
official or public employee is or has been associated" are specifically defined in the
Ethics Act as follows:
§ 1102. Definitions
"Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in
any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and
submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or
Staudt, 19-554
> umber 20, 2019
Page 3
contain the name of a former public official or public
employee.
"Person." A business, governmental body,
individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership,
committee, club or other organization or group of persons.
"Governmental body with which a public official
or public employee is or has been associated." The
governmental body within State government or a political
subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has
been employed or to which the public official or employee is
or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and
offices within that governmental body.
65 Pa.C.S. § 1102.
The term "Person" is very broadly defined. It includes, inter alia, corporations and
other businesses. It also includes the former public official p1pu ii c employee himself,
Confidential Opinion, 93-005, as well as a new governmental employer. Ledebur,
pinion 95-00 .
The term "represent" is also broadly defined to prohibit acting on behalf of any
person in any activity. Examples of prohibited representation include: (1) personal
appearances before the former governmental body or bodies; (2) attempts to influence;
(3) submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of
the former public official/public employee; (4) participating in any matters before the
former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; and (5) lobbying.
Popovich, Opinion 89-C 05.
Listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on a
proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental
body, constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Section
3(g) also generally prohibits the inclusion of the name of a former public official/
public employee on invoices submitted by his new employer to the former governmental
body, even if the invoices pertain to a contract that existed prior to termination of service
with such governmental body. SShaa , Opinion 91-012. However, if such a pre-existing
contract does not involve the unit where a former public employee worked, the name of
the former public employee may appear on routine invoices if required by the
regulations of the agency to which the billing is being submitted. AbramsANebster,
Opinion 95-011.
A former public official/public employee may assist in the preparation of any
documents presented to his former governmental body. However, the former public
official/public employee may not be identified on documents submitted to the former
governmental body. The farmer public official/public employee may also counsel any
person regarding that person's appearance before his former governmental body. Once
again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to the former
governmental body. The Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude making general
informational inquiries to the former governmental body to secure information which is
available to the general public, but this must not be done in an effort to indirectly
influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the
representation of, or work for, the new employer.
Section 1103(g) only restricts the former public official/public employee with
regard to representation before his former governmental body. The former public
official/public employee is not restricted as to representation before other agencies or
Staudt, 19-554
December 20, 2019
Page 4
entities. However, the "governmental body with which a public official/public employee
is or has been associated" is not limited to the particular subdivision of the agency or
other governmental body where the public official/public employee had influence or
control but extends to the entire body. See, Legislative Journal of House, 1989
Session, No. 15 at 290, 291; Sirolli, Opinion 90-006; Sharp, pinion 90-009-R.
The governmental body with which you are deemed to have been associated
upon termination of your empployment with PennDOT is PennDOT in its entirety,
including but not limited to Engineering District 8-0. Therefore, for the first year
following termination of your employment with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics
Act would apply and restrict "representation" of a "person" —including but not limited to
the Firm —before PennDOT.
In response to your specific question, you are advised as follows.
During the one-year period of applicability of Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, a
former public employee generally would be permitted to attend meetings held by his
former governmental body if such meetings would be open to the public and the former
public employee's role would not go beyond that of a general observer. Group Training
Conferences provided by PennDOT that would be open to consultant companies and
construction contractors would not fall within these parameters. To the contrary, for a
former PennDOT employee, the only basis for attending such a Group Training
C-o—nTrence would be as a representative of a consultant or construction contractor.
Therefore, you are advised that during the one-year period of applicability of
Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act, you would be prohibited from attending Group
Training Conference(s) pprovided by PennDOT to consultant companies and
construction contractors. Cf., Wanger, Advice 09-503-S; Smith, Advice 05-518.
Based upon the facts that have been submitted, this Advice has addressed the
applicability of Section 1103(g) only. It is expressly assumed that there has been no
use of authority of office or employment, or confidential information received by being in
the public position, for a private pecuniary benefit as prohibited by Section 1103(a) of
the Ethics Act. Further, you are advised that Sections 1103(b) and 1103(c) of the Ethics
Act provide in part that no person shall offer or give to a public official/public employee
and no public official/public employee shall solicit or accept anything of monetary value
based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public
official/public employee would
be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these
provisions of the law not to imply that there has been or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other
code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not
involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Specifically not addressed herein is the
applicability of the Governor's Code of Conduct.
Conclusion: In the former capacity as an Assistant Highway District Engineer for
e PennsyTvania Department of Transportation ("PennDOT"), you would be considered
a "public employee" subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics
Act'), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission,
51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et sue. Upon termination of your employment with PennDOT, you
became a "former public employee" subject to Section 1103() of the Ethics Act. The
former governmental body is PennDO� in its entirety, incuding but not limited to
Engineenng District 8-0. For the first year following termination of your employment
with PennDOT, Section 1103(g) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict
"representation" of a "person" —including but not limited to your new employer, TW
Staudt, 19 554
)giber 20, 2019
Page 5
Consultants, Inc. —before PennDOT. The restrictions as to representation outlined
above must be followed. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writingg and must be actsl
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date o is
Advice ursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 73.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
Robin M. Hittie
Chief Counsel