HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-606 ButtorffMr. Stephen Buttorff
R.D. #1 Box 262G
Millmont, PA 17845
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470 PA 17108-
TELEPHONE ,
E EPHO E�(717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 26, 1991
91 -606
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Township Supervisor,
Laborer, Second Class Township, Township Paid Benefits,
Medical Insurance, Compensation, Limited Working Hours.
Dear Mr. Buttorff:
This responds to your letter of November 5, 1991, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
by the
Issue: Whether a second class aborer township under the supervisor P�lic 0 ficial and
township in the capacity of a
Employee Ethics Law may participate in the township p aid health
insurance plan at township expense if he works a minimum of fifty
hours per semi- annual period, which is the minimum number of hours
that other employees of the township must work to participate in the
plan.
Facts: As a Second Class township Supervisor io b for
the to Second Cl
p ass in
Township in Union County, Pennsylvania, employed y opinion t from the
capacity of a laborer, you seek an advisory
State Ethics Commission concerning your prospective participation in
the Township's paid aid grow health insurance plan (Blue Cross /Blue that in
Shield) offered by the Township to
ormallymest blished that t employees
August, 1988, the supervisors eriod hours in a
would have to work a minimum of fail health insurance programP You
for inclusion in the Township's paid u have b g
employed
note that in addition to being a Supervisor, yo
by the Township as a laborer since prior to arch 3311, annual Youil
at le the minimum of Y periods do not greatly
although your total hours logged in some p
exceed the minimum requirement of fifty hours. Citing 53 P.S.
Mr. Stephen Buttorff
December 26, 1991
Page 2
Section 65515(c)(1), you state that it would appear that you and
your dependents remain eligible for inclusion in the Township's
group health insurance program because the above provision of the
Second Class Township Code provides that for supervisor /employees
to remain eligible for inclusion in such Township paid plans, they
must meet the same requirements for participation as other eligible
Township employees, and the plan must not improperly discriminate in
favor of a supervisor /employee. You feel that the risk to your
continued eligibility would be a challenge to the Township's
official policy of requiring a fifty hour minimum per semi - annual
period as unreasonably low and designed to make supervisors eligible
for participation. Nevertheless, any present or future employees,
whether or not they were also supervisors, would receive Township
paid group health insurance as long as they would log at least fifty
hours each semi - annual period.
You indicate that according to the Township records, previous
Township supervisor /employees, prior to March 31, 1985, were
included in Township paid health insurance even though no minimum
hours were established. Furthermore, you state that the Township
records support the fact that no Township supervisor works full time
year round, and that the other present Township employees who are
not supervisors also do not work full time year round, but are laid
off each year from November through March except for snow removal.
You acknowledge that the hourly totals for these non - supervisor
employees are quite higher than your own.
Finally, you state that you are not interested in the
eligibility of any other supervisor /employee or non - supervisor/
employee, but have.only provided the above information to provide a
full view and understanding of your situation as it pertains to
your request.
Discussion: As a Township Supervisor for a Second Class Township
in Union County, Pennsylvania you are a public official as that
term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to
the provisions of that law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public employee
shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows:
Mr. Stephen Buttorff
December 26, 1991
Page 3
Sectj,on 2. Definitions.
"Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a
public official or public employee of the authority
of his office or employment or any confidential
information received through his holding public
office or employment for the private pecuniary
,benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family
or a- business with which he or a member of his
immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or
"conflict of interest" does not include an action
having a de minimis economic impact or which affects
to the same degree a class consisting of the general
public or a subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group Which includes the public
official or public employee, a member of his
immediate family or a business with which he or a
member of his immediate family is associated.
"Authority of office or employment." The
actual power provided by law, the exercise of which
is necessary to the performance of duties and
responsibilities unique to a particular public
office or position of public employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in
part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee
anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall
solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the
understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the
public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is
made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or
will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete
response to the question presented.
It is initially noted that this Advice may only address your
prospective conduct in participating in the Township paid health
insurance program. Requests regarding past conduct or regarding
the conduct of third parties would be beyond the scope of an Advice
and could not and will not be addressed herein.
The Commission has previously considered similar inquiries. See.
Confidential Opinion 91 -001; Means. Opinion 90 -007. Although the
Mr. Stephen Buttorff
December 26, 1991
Page 4
Commission's inquiry in such cases has been limited to interpreting
and applying the Ethics Law, it has nevertheless been necessary to
review 53 P.S. Section 65515(c)(1) to the extent that it impacts
upon the Ethics Law regarding the issue of whether a
supervisor /employee would be using the authority of office to
obtain a private pecuniary benefit for himself. Confidential
Opinion 91 -001 at 4; Means, Opinion 90 -007 at 4.
The Second Class Township Code provides for participation by
supervisor /employees in insurance plans as follows:
Supervisor- employes and their dependents shall
be eligible for inclusion in group life, health,
hospitalization, medical service and accident
insurance plans paid in whole or in part by the
township. No policy of group life insurance shall
contain any provision for the accrual or deferral
of a cash surrender value, loan value or any other
nonforfeitable benefit, in addition to or beyond the
face amount of insurance, that shall inure to the
benefit of the supervisor, any beneficiary or any
other individual having an insurable interest in the
life of a supervisor. Such insurance however, may
contain a provision that when the insurance, or any
portion of it, on a person covered under the policy
ceases because of termination of employment or the
,termination of the insured's term of office, such
person shall be entitled to have issued to him by
the insurer, without evidence of insurability, an
individual policy of insurance on any form
customarily issued by the insurer at the age and for
the amount applied for if: (i) such amount is not
in excess of the amount of life insurance• which
ceases because of such termination; and (ii) the
application for the individual policy is made and
first premium .is paid to the insurer within thirty -
one days after such termination. Participation by
supervisor - employes shall not require auditor
approval. Supervisor- employes eligible for
inclusion in such plans must meet the same
requirements as other employes of the township who
are eligible to participate in an insurance plan.
Such plans shall not. improperly discriminate in
favor of a supervisor - employe.
53 P.S.S65515(c)(1).
It is noted that the restrictions of Section 3(a) of the Ethics
Law as set forth above prohibit the use of authority of office to
obtain a private pecuniary benefit for the public official. In this
Mr. Stephen Buttorff
December 26, 1991
Page 5
case, you as a supervisor /employee would have been designated in one
of the enumerated working positions (laborer) through formal action.
In addition, the above provision specifically provides that
supervisor /employes are eligible for inclusion in group health,
hospitalization, and medical service plans paid in whole or in part
by the Township. Under the facts as you have submitted them, the
Township paid health insurance program is in this case available to
all employees who work a minimum of fifty hours in a semi- annual
period.
Base upon all of the above and the prior decisions of this
Commission, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not prohibit your
participation in the Township's group.health insurance program under
which you and your dependents would receive, such benefits.
You are cautioned that you would be required to work all of the
hours which you log. You must exercise caution to recognize the
distinction between those duties which relate to that of office -
supervisor for which you cannot receive compensation (except as
allowed in Section 515(a) of the Second Class Township Code, 53 P.S.
Section 65515 and those duties which are encompassed within the
duties of a laborer for which you may be compensated as an employee -
supervisor. Thus, action on the part of a supervisor to receive
compensation as an emp.ovee- supervisor for duties which relate to
the position of office - supervisor have been determined to contravene
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act. See. Parish, Order 719.
You are further cautioned that because this Commission's
jurisdiction is limited to interpreting the provisions of the
Ethics Law, this Advice may not and does not offer any
interpretation as to whether the receipt of these benefits for such
limited working hours would be allowable under the Second Class
Township Code. In particular, this Advice does not address the
question of whether such limited working hours would improperly
discriminate in favor of a supervisor - employee under the Second
Class Township Code.
You are reminded that public office is a matter of public trust,
and that any effort to realize personal financial gain through
office is considered a violation of that trust. 65 P.S. §401. The
health insurance benefits in question are paid for by tax revenues
from the Township which you represent. Under the circumstances of
limited working hours for supervisor /employees, the Commission has
made such public officials aware of the utilization of tax revenues
for the payment of such a program relative to their very limited
working hours. In Means, Advice 90 -007, it was suggested that the
supervisor /employees should consider whether the better practice
would be to forgo such benefits where they would only be working
eight hours a year as roadmasters.
Mr. Stephen Buttorff
December 26, 1991
Page 6
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As a Township Supervisor for a Second Class
Township in Union County, Pennsylvania, you are a public official
subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Law would not prohibit you from participating in the
Township's paid group health insurance program under which you and
your dependents would receive such benefits, where you would be
logging as a Township laborer the minimum number of hours required
for Township employees to participate in the plan. The issue of
whether the receipt of the group health insurance benefits based
upon limited working hours of supervisor /employees constitutes an
improper discrimination under the Second Class Township Code is not
addressed. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only
been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in
any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance
on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission
review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission
will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be
issued. Any such appeal must be in writing and must'be received at
the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant to
51 Pa. Code S2.12.
ncerely,
Vincent J. Dopko
Chief Counsel