HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-567 ShorallDear Attorney Shorall:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
August 20, 1991
Mr. John G. Shorall, II 91 -567
Shorall and Shorall
Attorneys at Law
15th Floor - Frick Building
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Re: Public Employee /Official, FIS, Attorneys, Co -Bond Counsel,
Allegheny County Finance and Development Commission
This responds to your letter of July 1, 1991, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether members of the law firm of Shorall and Shorall in
the capacity as Co -Bond Counsel for the Allegheny County Finance
and Development Commission are to be considered public
officials /employees under the Public Official and Employee Ethics
Law ( "Ethics Law "), and therefore, required to comply with the
financial reporting and disclosure provisions of the Ethics Law.
Facts: The law firm of Shorall and Shorall acts as Co -Bond
Counsel for the Allegheny County Finance and Development
Commission (the "Commission "), which is comprised of various
Allegheny County Authorities including the Allegheny County
Higher Education Building Authority, the Allegheny County
Hospital Development Authority, the Allegheny County Industrial
Development Authority, and the Allegheny County Residential
Finance Authority. The Authorities within the Commission are
represented by their respective solicitors. Members of your law
firm, as Co -Bond. Counsel, act as independent bond lawyers
offering approving opinions for issues of the various Authorities
comprising the Commission. You note that such opinions address,
among other things, the validity and tax - exempt status of
transactions. As Co -Bond Counsel, you act as independent legal
experts whose responsibility is to render an objective legal
opinion rather than the partisan position of an advocate, with
regard to the bonds.
Mr. John G. Shorall, II
August 20, 1991
Page 2
Your specific inquiry is whether, with respect to your .
services as Co -Bond Counsel, members of your firm would be deemed
"public employees" subject to the financial reporting and
disclosure provisions of the Ethics Law. You state your belief
that the members of your firm would not be considered "public
employees" because you are not employed by the Commission or by
the Authorities which comprise the Commission. You state your
opinion that you are not responsible for taking or recommending
official action of a non - ministerial nature with regard to (1)
contracting or procurement, (2) administering or monitoring
grants or subsidies, (3) planning or zoning, (4) inspecting,
licensing, recommending or auditing any person or (5) any other
activity where the official action has an economic impact of
greater than a de minimis nature in the interest of any person;
all of which you note is set forth in Section 2 of the Ethics
Law. You state that you do not fall within the definition of
"solicitor" and therefore, you do not believe that members of
your firm are "public employees" or "solicitors ", either part -
time or full -time, to the various Authorities within the
Commission. While your office works in conjunction with the
Solicitors for the Commission and the Authorities, you state
that your role is separate and distinct from theirs.
Additionally, you do not receive compensation from the
Commission. The fees paid to your office in connection with your
efforts as Co -Bond Counsel are paid either from the proceeds of
the bonds or, in certain circumstances, directly by the borrower
in conduit and other financings.
Pursuant to your work as Co -Bond Counsel, you are a charter
member of the Pennsylvania Association of Bond Lawyers and a
member of the National Association of Bond Lawyers. You have
reviewed the publications and periodicals of those organizations
and have found no guidance with respect to your inquiry. You are
also unaware of the position taken by other bond counsel firms
within the Commonwealth of .Pennsylvania in this respect. Based
upon your review of the Ethics Law and various case law involving
this Commission, you believe that the provisions of the Ethics
Law and the holdings of those cases exclude your office and its
efforts as Co -Bond Counsel from the definition of "public
employee" and the requirements for filing Statements of Financial
Interests. However, you seek the advice of this Commission in
this regard.
Finally, you note that you personally serve as Assistant
City Solicitor for the City of Pittsburgh and in that capacity
you annually file a Statement of Financial Interests.
Additionally, George Shorall, a partner in your firm, serves as
Solicitor for the Allegheny County Retirement Board and he also
Mr. John G. Shorall, II
August 20, 1991
Page 3
annually files a Statement of Financial Interests in that
capacity.
Discussion: You question whether the requirements of the Ethics
Law with regard to financial reporting and disclosure for public
officials /public employees would be applicable to the members of
your law firm in their capacity as Co -Bond Counsel for the
Allegheny County Finance and Development Commission. You do not
believe your duties and responsibilities are within the
definition of "public employee."
We note that, for the sake of this response, we are relying
primarily on the your submitted description of your duties and
responsibilities as Co -Bond Counsel as set forth in your letter
of July 1, 1991.
The term "public employee" is defined in the Ethics Law as
follows:
Section 2. Definitions
"Public employee." Any individual employed
by the Commonwealth or a political
subdivision who is responsible for taking or
recommending official action of a non -
ministerial nature with regard to:
(1) contracting or procurement;
(2) administering or monitoring
grants or subsidies;
(3) planning or zoning;
(4) inspecting, licensing,
regulating or auditing any
person; or
(5) any other activity where the
official action has an
economic impact of greater
than a de minimus nature on
the interests of any person.
65 P.S. §402.
"Public employee" shall not include
individuals who are employed by the State
or any political subdivision thereof in
teaching as distinguished from
administrative duties. 65 P.S. §402.
It is further noted that full -time and part -time Solicitors
for political subdivisions are "public employees" subject to the
Mr. John G. Shorall, II
August 20, 1991
Page 4
financial reporting and disclosure requirements, as well as the
other restrictions of the Ethics Law. See, 65 P.S. §404(a);
Spataro, Opinion 89 -009 at 4; Maunus v. Com., State Ethics Com.,
544 A.2d 1324, 1326 (1988).
Based upon the definition of "public employee" as applied to
your firm's duties and responsibilities as Co -Bond Counsel for
the Allegheny County Finance and Development Commission, and in
light of the Commonwealth Court's holding in Rosters v. Com.,
State Ethics Commission 80 Pa. Commw. 43, 470 A.2d 1120 (1984),
members of your firm in the capacity of Co -Bond Counsel are not
to be considered "public employees" as that term is defined in
the Ethics Law. An objective review of the information you have
provided regarding your role as Co -Bond Counsel indicates that
you are not responsible for taking or recommending official
action of a non - ministerial nature with regard to any of the five
categories set forth in the definition listed above for the term
"public employee." Rather, you render objective legal opinions
as independent legal experts in a particular area of expertise.
You are not appointed to the office of Solicitor for the
Commission or for any of the Authorities within the Commission.
You are acting in the capacity of an independent legal
consultant, rather than as a Solicitor. Furthermore, you are
paid for your services from the proceeds of the bonds or in
certain circumstances directly by the borrower rather than by the
Commission itself.
Thus, because the members of your law firm are not within
the classification of the term "public employee" in the capacity
as Co -Bond Counsel for the Allegheny County Finance and
Development Commission, they would not be subject to the
financial reporting and disclosure requirements of the Ethics
Law. Accordingly, as Co -Bond Counsel for the Commission, the
members of your law firm would not be required to file the
Statement of Financial Interests for the years in which they
serve in that capacity. To the extent the members of your firm
serve in other capacities in which they are considered public
officials /employees, they would be subject to the Ethics Law and
would be required to file Statements of Financial Interests in
those capacities.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct
other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they
do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law.
Conclusion: As Co -Bond Counsel for the Allegheny County Finance
and Development Commission, the members of your law firm are not
Mr. John G. Shorall, II
August 20, 1991
Page 5
to be considered public employees as defined in the Ethics Law.
Accordingly, in that capacity they would not be subject to the
financial reporting and disclosure requirements of the Ethics
Law and need not file Statements of Financial Interests. Lastly,
the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed
under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in
reliance on the Advice given.
such.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the
Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing
and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code S2.12.
Sincerely,
e 040
Vincent J. Dopko,
Chief Counsel