HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-555 ConfidentialSTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
309 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
July 3, 1991
91 -555
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Member of General
Assembly, Use of Senate Video Facility to Broadcast Public
Affairs Television Talk Show
This responds to your letters of April 29, 1991 and May 8,
1991, in which you requested confidential advice from the State
Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law
presents any prohibition or restrictions upon a Member of the
Pennsylvania General Assembly with regard to using the Senate's
video facility to produce for broadcast a public affairs
television talk show, and with regard to soliciting sponsorships
from corporations, associations and the like to cover the cost of
purchasing air time required to broadcast this program.
Facts: As an attorney representing a Member of the Pennsylvania
General Assembly, you seek the advice of the State Ethics
Commission. Your client wishes to broadcast a public affairs
television talk show, which show would be produced by
Commonwealth employees using the Senate's video facility. The
subject matter for the talk show would be public affairs issues
relating to all levels of government. Guests would include
elected public officials and select public employees capable of
informed discussion of issues facing local, state, and federal
governments. The Senate's video facility which would be used to
produce the show is a bipartisan production studio under the
direction of the Chief Clerk of the Senate of Pennsylvania. The
Page 2
Chief Clerk of the Senate has promulgated policies that require
that the facility be used only to produce programming with a
legislative purpose. You have submitted a one -page document
entitled "Senate Video Facility" which sets forth the purpose and
other matters relating to the use of the facility, which document
is incorporated herein by reference. You state that the Member
who is your client would be acting in the capacity of an elected
public official in using the Senate's video facility to produce
this talk show.
To cover the cost of purchasing air time required to
broadcast this program, the Member is proposing to solicit
sponsorships from corporations, associations and the like. The
extent of the broadcast area would, in part, depend on the
results of your inquiry with this Commission. If the use of
sponsors is permissible and the Member chooses to exercise this
option, the entire district would be covered by the programming.
However, if municipal access channels are relied upon, it is your
best knowledge and belief that approximately 65 percent of the
homes in the district receive cable television.
You submit that there are two important and relevant facts
to be noted. First, some cable television systems offer free air
time for broadcasting public affairs programs, in effect
sponsoring the shows. Second, you state that the Member is not
a declared candidate for reelection at this time. Furthermore,
the Member is contemplating ceasing such broadcasts after
declaring a candidacy for reelection.
Finally, you state that your client avers that he is not
receiving any pecuniary benefit from this proposed activity.
Based upon all of the above, you seek a confidential advice
regarding the legality of the proposed conduct under the Ethics
Law.
Discussion: As a Member of the Pennsylvania General Assembly,
your client is a public official as that term is defined under
the Ethics Law, and hence he is subject to the provisions of that
law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
Page 3
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as
follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of
the authority of his office or employment or
any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for
the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a
member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. "Conflict" or
"conflict of interest" does not include an
action having a de minimis economic impact or
which affects to the same degree a class
consisting of the general public or a
subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group which includes the
public official or public employee, a member
or his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated.
"Authority of office or employment."
The actual power provided by law, the
exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities
unique to a particular public office or
position of public employment.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law
provide in part that no person shall offer to a public
official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept any thing of monetary
value based upon the understanding that the vote, official
action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be
influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the
law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
Turning to your specific inquiry, it appears that the
proposed conduct of your client as a Member of the Pennsylvania
General Assembly to utilize Commonwealth employees and the
Page 4
Senate's video facility to produce for broadcast the above public
affairs television talk show would not transgress the Ethics Law
under the facts which you have presented. Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Law prohibits conduct by a public official which would
constitute a conflict of interest. However, based upon the
submitted facts there would not be the requisite element of a
"private pecuniary benefit" so as to constitute a conflict of
interest as defined in the Ethics Law. With regard to soliciting
sponsors to cover the cost of purchasing air time to broadcast
this show, such would also be permissible based upon the express
assumption that all such solicited funds would be expended upon
the purchase of air time for the show, with no private pecuniary
benefit to the Member, any of his immediate family members, or
any business with which he or any of his immediate family
members are associated.
Thus, based upon the express assumption (and your
affirmative representations) that there would be no private
pecuniary benefit to the Member of the General Assembly whom you
represent, any of the members of his immediate family, or any
business with which he or any member of his immediate family is
associated as defined under the Ethics Law, the proposed conduct
would not transgress the provisions of the Ethics Law.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct
other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do
not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically,
not addressed herein is the applicability of the Legislative Code
of Conduct.
Conclusion: As a Member of the Pennsylvania General
Assembly, your client is a public official subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Law. Your client, as a Member of the
Pennsylvania General Assembly, would not transgress the Ethics
Law by utilizing employees of the Commonwealth and the Senate's
video facility under the facts as you have presented them, to
produce for broadcast a public affairs television talk show.
Solicitation of corporations, associations and the like for
sponsorships to cover the cost of purchasing air time to
broadcast the show would be permissible as well, as long as
there would be no private pecuniary benefit for the Member, any
of his immediate family members, or any business with which he or
any of his immediate family members is associated. This advice
is expressly conditioned upon your representations and the
assumption that the proposed conduct would not result in any
private pecuniary benefit to the Member of the General Assembly,
any member of his immediate family, or any business with which he
or any member of his immediate family is associated as defined
Page 5
under the Ethics Law. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed
conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in
reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the
Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing
and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 52.12.
Sincerely,
/ 1 1 ;t4Z40 4 . 0717e
Vincent . Dopko,
Chief Counsel