HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-502 SchroderMr. R. Curtis Schroder
1590 Caln Meetinghouse Road
Downingtown, PA 19335
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 1 71 08 -1 470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
Section 2. Definitions.
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
January 14, 1991
91 -502
Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Private Employment or
Business, Prothonotary and Attorney at Law.
Dear Mr. Schroder:
This responds to your letter of November 29, 1990, in which
you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether a county prothonotary is prohibited or restricted
by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law from working with,
being employed by or associated with a business /person in a
private capacity in addition to public service.
Facts: You seek an advisory opinion from the Ethics Commission
regarding the propriety of a County Prothonotary who may also be
an attorney regarding the practice of law in the same county.
You note that you are considering running for the prothonotary
position and would like to know if there are any restrictions
upon the practice of law in the same county.
Discussion: As a county prothonotary, you would be a public
official as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence
you would be subject to the provisions of that law.
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that
constitutes a conflict of interest.
The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as
follows:
Mr. R. Curtis Schroder
Page 2
"Conflict or conflict of interest." Use
by a public official or public employee of
the authority of his office or employment or
any confidential information received through
his holding public office or employment for
the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a
member of his immediate family or a business
with which he or a member of his immediate
family is associated. "Conflict" or
"conflict of interest" does not include an
action having a de minimis economic impact or
which affects to the same degree a class
consisting of the general public or a
subclass consisting of an industry,
occupation or other group which includes the
public official or public employee, a member
or his immediate family or a business with
which he or a member of his immediate family
is associated.
"Authority of office or employment."
The actual power provided by law, the
exercise of which is necessary to the
performance of duties and responsibilities
unique to a particular public office or
position of public employment.
"Business with which he is associated."
Any business in which the person or a member
of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner, employee or has a
financial interest.
In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law
provide in part that no person shall offer to a public
official /employee anything of monetary value and no public
official /employee shall solicit or accept any thing of monetary
value based upon the understanding that the vote, official
action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be
influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the
law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression
thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question
presented.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the
instant matter, we note that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does
not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business
activities or employment; however, the public official /employee
may not use the authority of office for the advancement of his
own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he
Mr. R. Curtis Schroder
Page 3
is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A public official/
employee must exercise caution so that his private business
activities do not conflict with his public duties. Crisci,
Opinion 89 -013. Thus, a public official /employee could not
perform private business using governmental facilities or
personnel. In particular, the governmental telephones, postage,
staff, equipment, research materials, personnel or any other
property could not be used as a means, in whole or part, to carry
out private business activities. In addition, the public
official /employee could not during government working hours,
solicit to promote such business activity. Pancoe, supra.
In the event that your private employer or business has a
matter pending before your governmental body or if you as part of
such official duties must participate, review or pass upon that
matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In
those instances, it will be necessary that you be removed from
that process.
In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law
would require not only that you abstain from participation but
also file a written memorandum to that effect with the person
recording the minutes or your supervisor.
In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following:
1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business
in a private capacity;
2. utilization of confidential information gained through
public position;
3. participating in discussions, reviews, or
recommendations on matters which relate to the business /private
employer which may come before the governmental body and in such
cases publicly announcing the relationship as well as filing a
written memorandum as per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the
Ethics Law. Brooks, Opinion 89 -023.
The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct
other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do
not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically
not addressed herein is the applicability of Rules of
Professional Responsibility or the County Code.
Conclusion: As a county prothonotary, you would be a public
official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section
3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside
Mr. R. Curtis Schroder
Page 4
employment /business activity subject to the restrictions and
qualifications as noted above. In the event that the
employer /business has matters pending before your governmental
body, then you could not participate in that matter and the
disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as
outlined above must be satisfied. Lastly, the propriety of the
proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law.
Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and
evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal
proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all
the material facts and committed the acts complained of in
reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the
Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing
and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date
of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 52.12.
ncerely,
Vincent
t "f4if
Dopko,
Chief Counsel