The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About90-612 TeetsMr. Frederick H. Teets R. D. #3, Box 674 Beaver Falls, PA 15010 Re: Conflict, Public Official /Employee, Private Employment or Business, Township Supervisor, Septic System, Contractor. Dear Mr. Teets: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL December 20, 1990 90 -612 This responds to your letter of November 16, 1990, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether a township supervisor is prohibited or restricted by the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law from working with, being employed by or associated with a business /person in a private capacity in addition to public service. Facts: In addition to serving as a Supervisor in North Sewickley Township, Beaver County, your occupation is that of a contractor who installs septic systems. You perform contract work for township residents and it has been brought to your attention that this activity with the citizens may be a conflict because of your status as a township supervisor. You do not use any of the municipal facilities or your position in soliciting business and you seek a determination as to whether such activities are within the guidelines of appropriate ethical conduct for your office. Discussion: As Supervisor for North Sewickley Township, you are a public official as that term is defined under the Ethics Law, and hence you are subject to the provisions of that law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law provides: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Law as follows: Mr. Frederick H. Teets Page 2 Section 2. Definitions. "Conflict or conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Conflict" or "conflict of interest" does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member or his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Law to the instant matter, we note that Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law does not prohibit public officials /employees from outside business activities or employment; however, the public official /employee Mr. Frederick H. Teets Page 3 may not use the authority of office for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89 -011. A public official /employee must exercise caution so that his private business activities do not conflict with his public duties. Crisci, Opinion 89 -013. Thus, a public official /employee could not perform private business using governmental facilities or personnel. In particular, the governmental telephones, postage, staff, equipment, research materials, personnel or any other property could not be used as a means, in whole or part, to carry out private business activities. In addition, the public official /employee could not during government working hours, solicit to promote such business activity. Pancoe, supra. In the event that your private employer or business has a matter pending before your governmental body or if you as part of such official duties must participate, review or pass upon that matter, a conflict would exist. Miller, Opinion 89 -024. In those instances, it will be necessary that you be removed from that process. In addition, because of your position as a township supervisor and as your private position as a contractor who installs sewer systems, you could not participate or vote as to comprehensive or individual sewage matters. Mihalik, Opinion 90- 002. In addition, in the event that any of the clients for whom you have installed septic systems have matters pending before the township, you could not participate in such matters. Miller, supra. In such cases as noted above, Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law would require not only that you abstain from participation but also file a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes or your supervisor. In summary, the Ethics Law would restrict the following: 1. The use of authority of office to obtain any business in a private capacity; 2. utilization of confidential information gained through public position; 3. participating in discussions, reviews, or recommendations on matters which relate to the business /private employer which may come before the governmental body and in such cases publicly announcing the relationship or advising the supervisor as well as filing a written memorandum as per the requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law. Brooks, Opinion 89 -023. Mr. Frederick H. Teets Page 4 The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Law has not been considered in that they do= not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Specifically not addressed herein is the applicability of Second Class Township Code. Conclusion: As Supervisor for North Sewickley Township, you are a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Law. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Law would not preclude you from outside employment /business activity subject to the restrictions and qualifications as noted above. In the event that the employer /business has matters pending before your governmental body, then you could not participate in that matter and the disclosure requirements of Section 3(j) of the Ethics Law as outlined above must be satisfied. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Pursuant to Section 7(11), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. such. This letter is a public record and will be made available as Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §2.12. erely, Vincent J. Dopko, Chief Counsel