Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-556 RollerMr. Mark A. Roller 1329 Country Club Drive Williamsport, PA 17701 Dear Mr. Roller: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL May 25, 1990 90 -556 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(g); DER; Regional Environmental Protection Director. This responds to your letter of January 29, 1990 and your letter of February 12, 1990 which was received on April 17, 1990 in which you request advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether the Ethics Law presents any restrictions upon your employment following your termination of service with the Department of Environmental Resources (DER). Facts: You have retired from state employment on January 12, 1990, previously having held the position of Regional Environmental Protection Director for the Williamsport Region of DER. You seek guidance as to what restrictions, if any, would apply to your activities referenced in your January 29 letter. In that letter, you indicated that you are considering doing consulting work or work for a consulting engineering firm and inquire as to whether you may perform such activities as follows: assist in preparing requests for approvals for industries and municipalities for environmental projects; contacting industries and municipalities to explain professional engineering services that may be provided; providing review and quality control of reports and design prepared by consulting firms; providing evaluation of environmental matters under consideration by legal firms; providing evaluation or recommendations on environmental matters for the banking industry and providing advice or reports on specific environmental matters for organizations and individuals. Discussion: As a Regional Environmental Protection Director for DER, you are to be considered a "public employee" within the definition of that term as set forth in the Public Official and Mr. Mark A. Roller Page 2 Employee Ethics Law and the Regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. Section 402; 51 Pa. Code Section 1.1. This conclusion is based upon your position, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that the power exists to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning, inspecting, administering or monitoring grants, leasing, regulating, auditing or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimus on the interests of another person. Consequently, upon termination of public service, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(g) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Law. Section 3(g) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted Activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. Initially, to answer your request the governmental body with which you were associated while working with DER must be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed. The term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated" is defined under the Ethics Law as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." The governmental body within State government or a political subdivision by which the public official or employee is or has been employed or to which the public official or employee is or has been appointed or elected and subdivisions and offices within that governmental body. In applying the above definition to the instant matter, we must conclude that the governmental body with which you have associated upon termination of public service would be DER. The above is based upon the language of the Ethics Law, the legislative intent (Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291) and the prior precedent of this Commission. Thus, in Sirolli, Opinion 90 -006, the Commission found that a former Division Director of the Department of Public Welfare Mr. Mark A. Roller Page 3 (DPW) was not merely restricted to the particular Division as was contended but was in fact restricted to all of DPW regarding the one year representation restriction. Similarly in Sharp, Opinion 90 -009, it was determined that a former legislative assistant to a state senator was not merely restricted to that particular senator but to the entire Senate as his former governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service with DER, Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would apply and restrict representation of persons or new employers vis -a -vis DER. It is noted that Act 9 of 1989 significantly broadened the definition of the term "governmental body with which a public official or public employee is or has been associated." It was the specific intent of the General Assembly to define the above term so that it was not merely limited to the area where a public official /employee had influence or control but extended to the entire governmental body with which the public official /employee was associated. The foregoing intent is reflected in the legislative debate relative to the amendatory language for the above term: We sought to make particularly clear that when we are prohibiting for 1 year that revolving -door kind of conduct, we are dealing not only with a particular subdivision of an agency or a local government but the entire unit..." Legislative Journal of House, 1989 Session, No. 15 at 290, 291. Therefore, since the Ethics Law must be construed to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the General Assembly under 1 Pa. C.S.A. 1901, it is clear that the governmental body with which you have been associated is DER. Turning now to the scope of the restrictions under Section 3(g), the Ethics Law does not affect one's ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the former governmental body. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which a person may engage, following departure from their governmental body. It is noted, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, Mr. Mark A. Roller Page 4 treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his association with his former governmental body. In respect to the one year representation, the Ethics Law defines "Represent" as follows: Section 2. Definitions. "Represent." To act on behalf of any other person in any activity which includes, but is not limited to, the following: personal appearances, negotiations, lobbying and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of a former public official or public employee. In addition, the term "Person" is defined as follows under the Ethics Law: Section 2. Definitions. "Person." A business, governmental body, individual, corporation, union, association, firm, partnership, committee, club or other organization or group of persons. The Commission, in Popovich, Opinion 89 -005, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the former governmental body or bodies, including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations in general or as to contracts; 2. Attempts to influence; 3. Submission of bid or contract proposals which are signed or contain the name of the former public official /employee; 4. Participating in any matters before the former governmental body as to acting on behalf of a person; 5. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the former governmental body in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. The Commission has also held that listing one's name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, Mr. Mark A. Roller Page 5 document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the former governmental body constitutes an attempt to influence the former governmental body. Therefore, within the first year after termination of service, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. The Commission, however, has stated that the inclusion of one's name as an employee or consultant on a "pricing proposal," even if submitted to or reviewed by DER, is not prohibited as representation. You may, assist in the preparation of any documents presented to DER so long as you are not identified as the preparer. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before DER. Once again, however, the activity in this respect should not be revealed to DER. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Law would not prohibit or preclude the making of general informational inquiries of DER to secure information which is available to the general public. This must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence the former governmental body or to otherwise make known to that body the representation of, or work for the new employer. As to the six specific areas in which you would perform consulting services, since those activities do not relate to your former governmental body (DER), Section 3(g) of the Ethics Law would not restrict such activities. The Commission has concluded that the administering of an existing contract as opposed to negotiating or renegotiating a contract would not be prohibited by the Ethics Law. In addition, Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of the Ethics Law provide in part that no person shall offer to a public official /employee anything of monetary value and no public official /employee shall solicit or accept any thing of monetary value based upon the understanding that the vote, official action, or judgement of the public official /employee would be influenced thereby. Reference is made to these provisions of the law not to imply that there has or will be any transgression thereof but merely to provide a complete response to the question presented. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Law. Conclusion: As a Regional Environmental Protection Director for DER, you are to be considered a "public employee" as defined in the Ethics Law. Upon termination of service with DER, you would Mr. Mark A. Roller Page 6 become a "former public employee" subject to the Ethics Law. Your former governmental body is DER. The restrictions as to representation as outlined above must be followed. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Law. Further, should service be terminated, as outlined above, the Ethics Law also requires that a Statement of Financial Interests be filed for the year following termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be received at the Commission within 15 days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. Sicerely, Vincent Ji. Dopko, Chief Counsel