Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-610 MilfordDear Ms. Milford: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 ADVICE OF COUNSEL July 15, 1988 Ms. Megan Milford Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17120 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(e), Environmental Policy Specialist I; Department of Environmental Resources 88 -610 This responds to your letter of June 8, 1988, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether the Ethics Act presents any restrictions upon your potential employment following your termination of service with the Department of Environmental Resources. Facts: You state that you resigned your position as an Environmental Policy Specialist I in the Department of Environmental Resources, hereinafter DER, in the Office of Policy, hereinafter Office. You state that you have accepted employment with the Waste Management of North America Inc. which is located in Morrisville, Pennsylvania. You then conclude by requesting advice as to the types of restrictions that would be applicable to you regarding your new employment. Although your job description is unavailable at this point in time, this Commission has received a photo copy of the classification specification for. an Environmental Policy Specialist I which is incorporated herein by reference. An individual in that position performs the following duties and responsibilities: "Definition: An employe in this class performs a variety of duties in the planning, development, and presentation of policy or regulatory analysis projects. Ms. Megan Milford July 15, 1988 Page 2 Policy analysis work involves assisting senior policy staff by conducting program or problem issue evaluations; examining trends, issue identification and evaluation; determining environmental and economic impacts; proposing options; assessing the impacts of the options; and assisting in the development of policy recommendations for review by the executive staff. Regulatory analysis work involves assisting senior policy staff in the design and conduct of studies of proposed rules and regulations; evaluating social, economic, and environmental impacts of the proposed rules and regulations; assisting program managers in the development of rules and regulations; coordinating the presentation of proposed rules and regulations by program mangers; analyzing proposed Federal legislation to determine social, economic, and program impacts; developing and presenting proposed Departmental position on Federal legislation; and assisting in the development of proposed changes to Federal legislation. Work involves representing the program_ at Board hearings, legislative hearings, meetings with program managers, meetings with the Governor's Washington D.C. Office, committees, and task forces. Work also involves extensive communication with senior staff members and program personnel to discuss key policy issues and assess options in cooperation with the program staff. Work includes serving as a member of a study team conducting comprehensive assessments of significant policy or regulatory issues. Work is assigned in the form of project objectives and desired results and work is reviewed at specific stages and upon completion by a professional superior for attainment of project objectives and quality through reports and conferences. Discussion: As a Environmental Specialist I for DER, you are to be considered a "public employee" within the definition of that term as set forth in the Ethics Act and the regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1. This conclusion is based upon your job description, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that you have the power to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning, inspecting or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimus on the interests of another person. Consequently, upon termination of this employment, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act provides that: Ms. Megan Milford July 15, 1988 Page 3 Section 3. Restricted activities. (e) No former official or public employee shall represent a person, with or without compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 P.S. §403. Initially, to answer your request the "governmental body" with which you were associated while working DER must be identified. Then, the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation" must be reviewed. In this context, the Ethics Commission has previously ruled that the "governmental body" with which an individual may be deemed to have been associated during his tenure of public office or employment extends to those entities where he had influence, responsibility, supervision, or control. See Ewing, Opinion 79- 010. See also Kuril v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Ethics Commission, 435 A.2d 940 (1981). From the description and analysis of your duties and responsibilities and based upon the facts outlined above, your jurisdiction, responsibility, influence and control appears to have been the Office. Thus, the "governmental body" with which you have been "associated" upon the termination of your employment would be the Office. Therefore, within the first year after you would leave DER, Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict your "representation" of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the Office. The Ethics Act would not affect your ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the Office. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which you may engage, following your departure from DER. It is noted, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his association with his former public employer. See Anderson, Opinion 83 -014; Zwikl, Opinion 85 -004. In respect to the one year representation the Ethics Commission has promulgated regulations to define "representation" as follows: Ms. Megan Milford July 15, 1988 Page 4 Section 1.1 Definitions. Representation - -- Any act on behalf of any person including but not limited to the following activities: personal appearances, negotiating contracts, lobbying, and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official or public employee. 51 Pa. Code §1.1. The Commission, in its opinions, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the governmental body or bodies with which you have been associated, (that is the Office), including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations on contracts with the Office; 2. Attempts to influence the Office; 3. Participating in any matters before the Office over which you had supervision, direct involvement, or responsibility while employed by DER; 4. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the Office in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. See Russell, Opinion 80 -048 and Seltzer, Opinion 80 -044. The Commission has also held that preparing and signing a proposal, document or bid, or listing your name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the Office, constitutes an attempt to influence your former governmental body. See Kilareski, Opinion 80 -054. Therefore, within the first year after you leave DER, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. The Commission, however, has stated that the inclusion of your name as an employee or consultant on a "pricing proposal," even if submitted to or reviewed by the Office, is not prohibited as "representation." See Kotalik, Opinion 84 -007. You may, assist in the preparation of any documents presented to the Office so long as you are not identified as the preparer. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before the Office. Once again, however, your Ms. Megan Milford July 15, 1988 Page 5 activity in this respect should not be revealed to the Office. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude you from making general informational inquiries of the Office to secure information which is available to the general public. See Cutt, Opinion 79 -023. This, of course, must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence these entities or to otherwise make known to the Office your representation of, or work for your new employer. Finally, the Commission has concluded that if you are administering an existing contract as opposed to negotiating or renegotiating a contract, your activities would not be prohibited by the Ethics Act. See Dalton, Opinion 80 -056 and Beaser, Advice 81 -538. Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act provides: (b) No person shall offer or give to a public official or public employee or candidate for public office or a member of his immediate family or a business with which he is associated, and no public official or public employee or candidate for public office shall solicit or accept, anything of value, including a gift, loan, political contribution, reward, or promise of future employment based on any understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public employee or candidate for public office would be influenced thereby. 65 P.S. 403(b). Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act must be referenced in order to provide a complete response to your inquiry. Under Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act cited above, which a public official or employee must observe, a public official or employee must neither offer nor accept anything of value on the understanding or with the intention that his judgment would be influenced thereby. It is assumed such a situation does not exist here. This Section is referenced not to indicate that any such activity has been or will be undertaken but in an effort to provide a complete response to your inquiry. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Ms. Megan Milford July 15, 1988 Page 6 Conclusion: As a Policy Specialist I, you are to be considered a "public employee" as defined in the Ethics Act. Upon termination of your service with DER, you would become a "former public employee" subject to the restrictions imposed by Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. As such, your conduct should conform to the requirements of the Ethics Act as outlined above. Your governmental body for the purpose of the one year representation restriction is the Office. Lastly, the propriety of your proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethic Act. Further, should you terminate your employment or service, as outlined above, you are reminded that the Ethics Act also requires you to file a Statement of Financial Interests for the year following your termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §2.12. Sincerely, (� Vincent J. Dopko, General Counsel