HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-602 NewcomerPaul C. Newcomer, O.D.
628 Juniper Street
Quakertown, PA 18951
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
July 7, 1988
88-602
Re: Conflict of Interest, Township Supervisor, Voting on
Appointment of Individual who Co -Owns Property with
Supervisor
Dear Mr. Newcomer:
This responds to your letter of June 2, 1988, in which you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the
restrictions upon a
on the appointment
with the supervisor.
State Ethics Act presents any prohibition or
second class township supervisor from voting
of an individual who jointly owns property
Facts: You state that you are currently a supervisor in a second
class township which has a five member board. You then advise
that you would like to nominate or vote for the appointment to a
vacancy of an individual who is the co -owner with you of property
in the township. You then state that the property consists of a
75 acre tract of pastures, farming fields and woods. After
noting that you lease the pasture area for a 1.00 per year and
that you receive no income whatsoever from the farmland or woods,
you state that the 75 acre tract is under the 515 Agriculrtural
Act and that you have no other business association with this
individual to whom you are not related. You conclude by
requesting advice under the Ethics Act as to whether you may
nominate or vote for this individual.
Discussion: As a township supervisor, you are a "public
official" as that term is defined under the Ethics Act. 65 P.S.
§402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1. As such, your conduct must conform to
the requirements of the Ethics Act.
Paul C. Newcomer, O.L.
July 7, 1988
Page 2
The Act does, however, provide as follows:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public employee
shall use his public office or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office to obtain financial
gain other than compensation provided by law
for himself, a member of his immediate
family, or a business with which he is
associated. 65 P.S. 403(a).
Within the above provision of law, no public official may
;e hic position or any confidential information obtained therein
i order to obtain a financial gain for himself or a member of
he_s immediate family or a business with which he is associated.
TA) Act defines business with which one is associated as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Business with which he is associated." Any
business in which the person or a member of
the person's immediate family is a director,
officer, owner, employee or holder of stock.
65 P.S. 402.
Under this provision, the Ethics Commission has determined
':hat the use of office by a public official to obtain a gain or
benefit for himself which is not provided for in law constitutes
a "financial gain other than compensation provided for by law."
These determinations have been appealed to the Commonwealth Court
of Pennsylvania which has affirmed the orders of the Commission.
See McCutcheon v. State Ethics Commission, 77 Pa. Commw. 529
(1983). See also Yacobet v. State Ethics Commission, Pa.
Ccrnmw. , 531 A.2d 536 (1987). Under this provision, a public
official may not use public office to secure any financial gain
fo:: himself or for a business with which he is associated. See
Domalakes, Opinion 85 -010.
The term business is defined under the Ethics Act as
follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Business." Any corporation, partnership,
sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise,
franchise, association, organization,
self - employed individual, holding company,
Paul C. Newcomer, O.D.
July 7, 1988
Page 3
such.
joint stock company, receivership, trust or
any legal entity organized for profit. 65
P.S. 5402.
In the instant matter, it does not appear that your co-
ownership of this 75 acre tract of pasture, farm fields and woods
is a business as that term is defined under the Ethics Act.
Although you jointly own this property with this other
individual, you have stated that you lease the pasture land for
only 1.00 a year and receive no income from the farmlands or
woods. Under these facts it does not appear that such activity
would constitute a business as that term is used under the Act;
furthermore, under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act, since you are
only receiving a nominal or token amount of 1.00 per year, there
would not be any financial gain and hence Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Act would not be implicated in this instance. You have
stated that you are not related to this individual and that you
have no other business association with him. Since your co-
ownership of this land does not appear to be a business and since
it does not appear that you are receiving any financial gain from
your co- ownership of this land, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act
would not preclude you from voting on the appointment of this
individual.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct
other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do
not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As a supervisor in a second class township you are a
"public official" subject to the provisions of the State Ethics
Act. Your co- ownership of land, which is not a business and for
which you only receive a nominal lease of a 1.00 per year, would
not preclude you under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act from
nominating or voting for the appointment to the vacancy of the
individual who is the co -owner of the land. Lastly, the
propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under
the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding- initiated by the
Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil
or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts
complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Paul C. Newcomer, O.D.
July 7, 1988
Page 4
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the
Commission will be scheduled and a former Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §2.12.
Sincerely,
.„,„-Ar),001-dAt)
Vincent J. Dopko,
General Counsel