HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-557 HeasleyMr. Samuel H. Heasley
415 Main Street
Irwin, PA 15642
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 26, 1988
88 - 557
Re: Conflict of Interest, Public Official, Borough Tax
Collector, Bidding On Property at County Tax Sale
Dear Mr. Heasley:
This responds to you letter of [March] 15, 1988, in which
you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: You ask whether the State Ethics Act presents any
restriction upon a borough tax collector from purchasing property
in the borough that is put up for tax sale by the County Tax
Claim Borough.
Facts: In your letter you state that you are the elected tax
collector for Irwin Borough. After noting that the house
adjoining your own is and has been vacant for nine years, is an
eyesore and a fire hazard, you state that you have complained,
without success, to various borough officials regarding that
property as to violations of property maintenance and building
codes. You then state that the owner of that property resides in
Los Angeles, California but paid the property taxes until the
fall of 1986, even though the house has been unoccupied. You
then state that the taxes have remained delinquent and if they
are not paid by September, 1988, the Westmoreland County Tax
Claim Borough will put the house up for a tax sale. You further
note that if you are permitted to bid on and buy the property at
the tax sale, you would not be using any inside information in
that the property would be posted and advertised in the local
paper for tax sale. It is further stated by you that if you
obtain the property, you would probably tear it down so as to
resolve a problem that the borough officials have been unwilling
Mr. Samuel H. Heasley
April 26, 1988
Page 2
to resolve. Under these facts and circumstances, you request
advice as to whether you as elected tax collector for Irwin
Borough, may under the Ethics Act bid upon and purchase the
adjoining property in a tax sale.
Discussion: As a tax collector for Irwin Borough, you are a
public official within the definition of that term as set forth
in the Ethics Act and the regulations of this Commission. 65
P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1. As such, your subject to the
provisions of the Ethics Act. f ,
Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act provides:
Section 3. Restricted Activities.
(a) No public official or public employee
shall use his public office or any
confidential information received through his
holding public office to obtain financial
gain other than compensation provided by law
for himself, a member of his immediate
family, or a business with which he is
associated. 65 P.S. 403(a).
Section 3(a) basically provides that a public official or
employee may not use his public office or confidentiay.
information to obtain a financial gain other than compensation
as provided for by law for himself or a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he is associated. Under this
provision, the Ethics Commission has determined that the use of
office by a public official to obtain a gain or benefit for
himself or a member of his immediate family which is not provided
for in law constitutes a "financial gain other than compensation
provided for by law." These determinations have been appealed to
the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania which has affirmed the
Orders of the Commission. See McCutcheon v. State Ethics
Commission, 77 Pa. Commw. 529 (1983). See also Yocabet v. State
Ethics Commission, Pa. Commw. , 531 A.2d 536 (1987).
Thus, under this provision, a public official may not use his
public position to secure benefits for himself or a member of his
immediate family which are not provided for by law. Domalakes,
Opinion 85 -010; likewise, the receipt of private financial gain
or benefit through use of office is not permitted under this
section, Huff, Opinion 84 -015.
Mr. Samuel H. Heasley
April 26, 1988
Page 3
Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act provides:
(b) No person shall offer or give to a public
official or public employee or candidate for
public office or a member of his immediate
family or a business with which he is
associated, and no public official or public
employee or candidate for public office shall
solicit or accept, anything of value,
including a gift, loan, polit'i cal
contribution, reward, or promise of future
employment based on any understanding that
the vote, official action, or judgment of the
public employee or candidate for public
office would be influenced thereby. 65 P.S.
403(b).
Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act must be referenced in order
to provide a complete response to your inquiry. Under Section
3(b) of the Ethics Act cited above, which a public official or
employee must observe, a public official or employee must neither
offer nor accept anything of value on the understanding or with
the intention that his judgment would be influenced thereby. It
is assumed such a situation does not exist here. This Section is
referenced not to indicate that any such activity has been or
will be undertaken but in an effort to provide a complete
response to your inquiry.
In the instant matter, Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act would
not preclude you as elected tax collector from bidding on this,
borough property which is put up for tax sale. Under these
circumstances, you would not be using public office or any
confidential information; if the taxes were not paid on the
property in question, it will be put up for tax sale by the
Westmoreland County Tax Claim Borough and you as well as any
other citizen could bid on the property. In this regard, it
should be noted that the Ethics Commission has determined that
the Ethics Act was primarily designed to restrict the activities
of public officials /employees where conflicts of interests or the
appearance of thereof exist but that the Ethics Act should not be
interpreted to preclude public officials /employees from
participating in programs or matters that might otherwise be
available to them as citizens. See Pepper, Opinion 87 -008. Thus,
you may consistent with Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act, bid on
the borough property if it is put up for tax sale by the
Westmoreland County Tax Claim Borough.
Mr. SamuA1 H. Heasley
April 26, 1988
Page 4
such.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been
addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability o any other
statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct
other than the Ethics Act•has not been considered in that they do
not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As a tax collector for Irwin Borough, you are a
public official subject to the provisions of the State Ethics
Act. You may, consistent with the Ethics Act, bid upon a
property in the borough which is put up for tax sale by the
Westmoreland County Tax Claim Borough subject to the
qualifications referenced above. Lastly, the propriety of the
proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the
Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil
or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts
complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the
Commission will be scheduled and a former Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code §2.12.
•cerely,
Vincent `d. Dopko,
General Counsel