Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-645 BuppMs. Dorothy R. Bupp Box 330, R. D. #1 Harmony, PA 16037 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PA 17120 TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610 December 21, 1987 ADVICE OF COUNSEL 87 -645 Re: Conflict of Interest, Township Auditor, Township Secretary Daughter Dear Ms. Bupp: This responds to your letter of November 20, 1987, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether the State Ethics Act presents any prohibition upon you as a township auditor relative to performing audit functions at the township office when your daughter serves as township secretary. Facts: You state that you are one of the three recently elected auditors in Lancaster Township, Butler County, wherein your daughter serves as secretary to the township. You have advised that your daughter is 38 years old and is out of the household. You further state that a local bank is the township treasurer and that all checks must be co- signed by two of the three supervisors in the township. You then ask what restrictions the Ethics Act would impose upon you in performing your audit functions at the township due to the fact that your daughter serves as township secretary. Discussion: As a township auditor for Lancaster Township, Butler County, you are a "public official" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1 . As such, you are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and the restrictions therein are applicable to you. Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act provides: Section 3. Restricted activities. (a) No public official or public employee shall use his public office or any confidential information received through his holding public office to obtain financial gain other than compensation provided by law for himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with which he is associated. 65 P.S. 403(a). Ms. Dorothy R. Bupp December 21, 1987 Page 2 Section 3(a) basically provides that a public official may not use his public office or confidential information to obtain a financial gain other than compensation as provided for by law for himself or a member of his immediate family. Under this provision, the Ethics Commission has determined that the use of office by a public official to obtain a gain or benefit for himself or a member of his immediate family which is not provided for in law constitutes a "financial gain other than compensation provided for by law." See McCutcheon v. State Ethics Commission, 77 Pa. Commw. 529 (1983). See also Yocabet v. State Ethics Commission, Pa. Commw. , 531 A.2d 536 (1987). Thus, under this provision, you may not use your public position to secure any financial gain for yourself or your immediate family which is not provided for in law. Section 2 of the Ethics Act provides: Section 2. Definitions. "Immediate family." A spouse residing in the person's household and minor dependent children. 65 P.S. 402. In the instant situation, since your daughter is not a minor dependent child, she i s. not within the definition of immediate family as that term is defined in the Ethics Act. Accordingly, there is no prohibition under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act upon you as a township auditor in performing your auditing functions at the township office where your daughter is township secretary. Lastly, the propriety of your proposed conduct has only addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been addressed. Specifically, not addressed in this advice is whether the Township Code would impose any restrictions upon you. Advice regarding the propriety of your activities under the Township Code must be addressed by the solicitor since that would not involve any interpretation of the State Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a township auditor for Lancaster Township, Butler County, you are a "public official" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Since your daughter who serves as township secretary is not a minor dependent child, she is not a member of your "immediate family" as that term is defined in the Ethics Act; accordingly, the Ethics Act would not impose any prohibition upon you in performing your auditing function at the township office where your daughter serves as township secretary. Lastly, your proposed conduct has only been considered under the Ethics Act but the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation, or other code of conduct has not been considered. Ms. Dorothy R. Bupp December 21, 1987 Page 3 Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission w i l l be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko General Counsel