Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-623 DietrichMr. Wayne L. Dietrich 315 Glendale Drive Shiremanstown, PA 17011 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 11470 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470 TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610 Odctober 21, 1987 ADVICE OF COUNSEL 87 - 623 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(e), Director of Corporation Bureau, Department of State Dear Mr. Dietrich: This responds to your letter of October 5, 1987, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether the Ethics Act presents any restrictions upon your potential employment following your termination of service with the Department of State. Facts: You state that you are currently the Director of the Corporation Bureau, hereinafter Bureau in the Department of State, hereinafter Department. And, as such, are responsible for supervising the flow of documents through the Bureau consisting of articles of incorporation, Uniform Commercial Code filings and other similar documents, which are routinely filed by subordinates of the Director. You state that in your capacity as Director, you render no legal advice, take no action or make no recommendations regard the filing of these documents. You state that you intend to become associated with a corporation which would provide a business service for individuals, entities and corporations that might require assistance in preparing or filing documents with the various departments or agencies of the Commonwealth. You further state that approximately 40% of the time would be devoted to filing services relative to the departments or agencies other than the Department while 60% of the time would be devoted to those services relative to the Department. Specifically, as to the Department, the service would entail physically delivering documents to the Bureau, physically picking up certificates of incorporations after issuance and requesting and retrieving copies of previously filed documents. You further state that if you have inquiries with the Bureau, it would be in the nature of requesting general Mr. Wayne L. Dietrich October 21, 1987 Page 2 information which is available to all members of the general public. You note that the filings in which your business would engage would not deal with matters of policy nor the approval or disapproval on the merits or demerits of a particular filing but would be limited to formatted or mechanical filings and retrieval requests. You also state that you would not use confidential information which was not available to the public in your business enterprise. Lastly, as to those applications or documents which would require filing, you state that it would not be done in the capacity other than that which would be available to the general public and that the filing would be in the nature of a licensed application with the Motor Vehicle Bureau or the filing of a tax return as a preparer. You add that you do not anticipate that you would be required to sign these documents on a regular or routine basis. Your job description /specification which is incorporated herein by reference provides that your duties as Director of the Bureau entail reviewing the procedures and laws relative to the filing of the documents, reviewing budgetary matters, analyzing personnel needs and establishing Bureau goals and objectives. Furthermore, you have the responsibility of supervising the processing of documents through the Bureau, as well as providing information relative to those documents. You are further required to handle matters for the executive staff, resolve legal issues and other problems concerning filing procedures. You also review and analyze proposed legislation which would impact upon the Bureau and the public dealing with the Bureau. Lastly, you perform any other duties as is necessary in the performance of your position as Director of the Bureau. You then request what restrictions would be imposed upon you by the Ethics Act following the termination of your state service followed by the undertaking of the business activity as outlined. Discussion: At the outset, it must be noted that the Ethics Commission may only address your question within the purview of the Ethics Act. The Commission may not and w i l l not offer advice with respect to any duties or obligations that may be imposed by other provisions of law such as the State Adverse Interest Act or the Governor's Code of Conduct. As a Director for the Bureau, you are to be considered a "public employee" within the definition of that term as set forth in the Ethics Act and the regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. §402; 51 Pa. Code §1.1. This conclusion is based upon your job description, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that you have the power to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning, inspecting or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimus on the interests of another person.; Mr. Wayne L. Dietrich October 21, 1987 Page 3 • Consequently, upon termination of this employment, you would become a "former public employee" subject to Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (e) No former official or public employee shall represent a person, with or without compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 P.S. 403. Initially, to answer your request we must identify the "governmental body" with which you were associated while working with the Department. Then, we must review the scope of the prohibitions associated with the concept and term of "representation ". In this context, the Ethics Commission has previously ruled that the "governmental body" with which an individual may be deemed to have been associated during his tenure of public office or employment extends to those entities where he had influence, responsibility, supervision, or control. See Ewing, 79 -010. See also Kury vs. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Ethics Commission, 435 A.2d 940 (1981). From the description and analysis of your duties and responsibilities and based upon the facts outlined above, your jurisdiction, responsibility, influence and control appears to have been the Bureau. Thus, the "governmental body" with which you have been "associated" upon the termination of your employment would be the Bureau. Therefore, within the first year after you would leave the Department, Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict your "representation" of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the Bureau. The Ethics Act would not affect your ability to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the Bureau. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which you may engage, following your departure from the Department. We do note, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the term of a person's public employment he must act consistently with the public trust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not be allowed to utilize his association with the public sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or benefits that may be obtainable only because of his association with his former public employer. See Anderson, 83 -014; Zwikl, 85 -004. In.respect to the one year representation restriction the Ethics Commission has promulgated regulations to define "representation" as follows: Mr. Wayne L. Dietrich October 21, 1987 Page 4 Section 1.1. Definitions. Representation - -- Any act on behalf of any person including but not limited to the following activities: personal appearances, negotiating contracts, lobbying, and submitting bid or contract proposals which are signed by or contain the name of the former public official or public employe. 51 Pa. Code 1.1. The Commission, in its opinions, has also interpreted the term "representation" as used in Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act to prohibit: 1. Personal appearances before the governmental body or bodies with which you have been associated, (that is the Bureau), including, but not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations on contracts with the Bureau; 2. Attempts to influence the Bureau; 3. Participating in matters before the Bureau over which you had supervision, direct involvement, or responsibility while employed by the Department; 4. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the Bureau in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. See Russell, 80 -048 and Seltzer, 80 -044. The Commission has also held that preparing and signing a proposal, document or bid, or listing your name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or bid, if submitted to or reviewed by the Bureau, constitutes an attempt to influence your former governmental body. See Kilareski, 80 -054. Therefore, within the first year after you leave the Department, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. The Commission, however, has stated that the inclusion of your name as an employee or consultant on a "pricing proposal," even if submitted to or reviewed by the Bureau, is not prohibited as "representation." See Kotalik, 84 -007. You may, assist in the preparation of any documents presented to the Bureau so long as you are not identified as the preparer. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before the Bureau. Once again, however, your activity in this respect should not be revealed to the Bureau. Of course, any ban under the Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude you from making general informational inquiries of the Bureau to secure information which is available to the general public. See Cutt, 79 -023. This, of course, must not be done in an effort to indirectly influence these entities or to otherwise make known to the Bureau your representation of, or work for your new employer. Mr. Wayne L. Dietrich October 21, 1987 Page 5 Finally, the Commission has concluded that if you are administering an existing contract as opposed to negotiating or renegotiating a contract, your activities would not be prohibited by the Ethics Act. See Dalton, 80 -056 and Beaser, 81 -538. Additionally, we note that Section 403(b) of the State Ethics Act would prohibit any public employee or public official from accepting a position of employment if said position has been offered based upon the understanding that the official conduct of the employee or official, while working for his former governmental body, was influenced by such offer. See 65 P.S. §403(b). Conclusion: As a Director of the Bureau, you are to be considered a "public employee" as defined in the Ethics Act. Upon termination of your service with the Department, you would become a "former public employee" subject to the restrictions imposed by Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. As such, your conduct should conform to the requirements of the Ethics Act as outlined above. Your governmental body for the purpose of the one year representation restriction is the Bureau. Further, should you terminate your employment or service, as outlined above, you are reminded that the Ethics Act also requires you to file a Statement of Financial Interests for the year following your termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission w i l l be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. Sincerely, Vincent J. Dopko General Counsel