HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-582 GallagherPHONE: 717-783-1610
TOLL FREE: 1-800-932-0936
Z�
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
FINANCE BUILDING
613 NORTH STREET, ROOM 309
HARRISBURG, PA 17120-0400
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
December 18, 2017
To the Requester:
Mr. Michael D. Gallagher, Esquire
Murrin, Taylor & Gallagher
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
FACSIMILE: 717-787-0806
WEBSITE: www.ethics.pa.gov
This responds to your letter dated October 30, 2017, by which you requested an
advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission ("Commission").
Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65
F—a.TS. § 1101 et seer.., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon an individual with
regard to simultaneously serving as a township manager and a member of a municipal
authority board.
Facts: As Solicitor for Adams Township ("Township'), located in Butler County,
Pennsylvania, you have been authorized by the Township Board of Supervisors to
request an advisory from the Commission based upon the following submitted facts.
The Township Board of Supervisors is considering appointing an individual the
"Individual") who is a Township employee to the position of Township Manager. The
Individual is a Township resident. The Township Board of Supervisors is also
considering appointing the Individual as a Member of the Board of the Adams Township
Water Authority ("Authority").
You ask whether the Ethics Act would permit the Individual to simultaneously
serve as the Township Manager and a Member of the Authority Board.
Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of
e Ethics Act, 65 Pa-C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester
based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based
upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an
independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not
been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material
facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 11070O0 , (11). An advisory only affords a
defense to the extent the requester has truthfully discllosed all of the material facts.
If the Individual would be appointed as the Township Manager, the Individual
would in that capacity be a public official/public employee subject to the provisions of
Gafleca her, 17-582
D ember 18, 2017
Page 2
the Ethics Act. If the Individual would be appointed as a Member of the Authority Board,
the Individual would in that capacity be a public official subject to the Ethics Act.
Sections 1103(a) and 11030) of the Ethics Act provide:
§ 1103. Restricted activities
(a) Conflict of interest. --No public official or public
employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict
of interest.
0) Voting conflict. --Where voting conflicts are not
otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or
by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following
procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public
employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be
required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of
interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being
taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his
interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed
with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a
governing body would be unable to take any action on a
matter before it because the number of members of the body
required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this
section makes the majority or other legally required vote of
approval unattainable, then such members shall be
permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise
Ed
herein. In the case of a three -member governing
body of a political subdivision, where one member has
abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and
the remaining two members of the governing body have cast
opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be
permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made
as otherwise provided herein.
65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), 0).
Subject to the statutory exclusions to the Ethics Act's definition of the term
it or "conflict of interest," 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102, a public official/public employee is
prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential
information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit
of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a
business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The use of
authority of office is not limited merely to voting, but extends to any use of authority of
office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a
particular result. Juliante, Order 809.
In each instance of a conflict of interest, a public official/public employee would
be required to abstain from participation, which would include voting unless one of the
statutory exceptions of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would be applicable.
Additionally, the disclosure requirements of Section 11030) of the Ethics Act would have
to be satisfied in the event of a voting conflict.
In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the question presented, it is
initially noted that the General Assembly has the constitutional power to declare by law
which offices are incompatible. Pa. Const. Art. 6, § 2. There does not appear to be any
Galls he_r, 17-582
ecp ember 18, 2017
Page 3
statutorily -declared incompatibility that would preclude the Individual from
simultaneously serving as the Township Manager and a Member of the Authority Board.
Turning to the question of conflict of interest, where simultaneous service would
place the public official/public employee in a continual state of conflict, such as where in
one position he would be accounting to himself in another position on a continual basis,
there would be an inherent conflict. See, McC�, Oppinion 02-009). Where an inherent
conflict would exist, it would appear to be impossible, as a practical matter, for the
public official/public employee to function in the conflicting positions without running
afoul of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act.
Absent a statutorily -declared incompatibility or an inherent conflict under Section
1103(a), the Ethics Act would not preclude an individual from simultaneously serving in
more than one position. However, in each instance of a conflict of interest, the
individual would be required to abstain from participation.
In this case, based upon the facts that have been submitted, there does not
appear to be an inherent conflict that would preclude the Individual from simultaneously
serving as the Township Manager and a Member of the Authority Board.
Consequently, such simultaneous service would be permitted within the parameters of
Sections 1103(a) and 11030) of the Ethics Act.
Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the
Ethics Act.
Conclusion, Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) the Board of Supervisors
of AdamiT—Township "Township"), Butler County, Pennsylvania, is considering
appointing an individual (the "Individual") who is a Township employee to the position of
Township Manager; {2} the Individual is a Townshipresident; and (3) the Township
Board of Supervisors is also considering appointing the Individual as a Member of the
Board of the Adams Township Water Authority ("Authority"), you are advised as follows.
If the Individual would be appointed as the Township Manager, the Individual
would in that capacity be a public official/public employee subject to the provisions of
the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act ("Ethics Act"), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seg. If
the Individual would be appointedas a Member of the Authority Board, the Individual
would in that capacity be a public official subject to the Ethics Act. Subject to the
restrictions, conditions and qualifications set forth above, the Individual may, consistent
with Section 1103 a) of the Ethics Act, simultaneously serve as the Township Manager
and a Member of the Authority Board. lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has
only been addressed under the Ethics Act.
Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense
in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed
truthfully.all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the
Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any
reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full
Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be
scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission.
Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually,
received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Gallagher, 17-582
ecD ember 18, 2017
Page 4
Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 93.2(h). The appeal may be
received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail,
delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to
file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may
result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Sincerely,
.,in
. Hittie
Chief Counsel