Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-629 SteckMailing Address: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P.O. BOX 1 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610 Novemher 18, 1Q86 AfVICE OF COUNSEL • Mathew d. Steck 2417 Ellerslie Street Harrisburg, PA 17104 near Mr. Steck: 86 -629 Re: Former Public Employee; Section 3(e), Legislative Assistant, State Senate This responds to your letter of Octoher 29, 1986, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether the Ethics Act presents any restrictions upon your potential employment following your termination of service with the Pennsylvania State Senate. Facts: You advise that you are currently employed as a Research Analyst in the Office of State Senator Frank A. Pecnra. In this respect, you are involved in assisting the State Senator in the execution of his official duties. We have reviewed your position classification, (007), and have incorporated that document herein by reference. Generally, you perform a wide variety of legislative support tasks and act with discretion 3n hehalf of the State Senator. Generally, you conduct research studies that may he directed to the alleviation of problems concerning constituents, caucus members other governmental agencies. You also follow through on corrective measures and actions. You write position papers, speeches and background materials and deliver speeches and attend puhlic meetings on hehalf of the Senator. As part of your function, you are required to handle complex and confidential task on hehalf of the Senator. In addition to the foregoing, you advise that prior to your current position you served for two years in the President Pro Tempore's Office of Legislative Information. Your responsibilities in that position centered upon constituent casework, and special projects. For a period of six months in 1985, you were employed as acting Executive firector of the Senate Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee. In this respect, while you reviewed and analyzed Stat Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Mathew J. Steck November 18, 1986 Page 2 legislation for the committee, you did not designate which legislation should he acted upon. You terminated your employment with the OLT in Septemher of 1985 and assumed the position with Senator Pecora. You have requested the advice of the State Ethics Commission regarding any restrictions that might he imposed upon you within the purview of the State Ethics Act in the event that you should terminate your employment with the Pennsylvania State Senate. niscussion: At the outset, it must he noted that the Ethics Commission may orlv address your question within the purview of the Ethics Act. The Commission may not and will not offer advice with respect to any duties or obligations that may he imposed by other provisions of law. As a Legislative Assistant for a State Senator, you are to he considered a "public employee" within the definition of that term as set forth in the Ethics Act and the regulations of this Commission. 65 P.S. 54112; 51 Pa. Code 61.1. This conclusion is hased upon your joh description, which when reviewed on an objective basis, indicates clearly that you have the power to take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with respect to contracting, procurement, planning, inspecting or other activities where the economic impact is greater than de minimus on the interests of another person. See, Evans, R4 -589, Myers, R4 -609, Pouch, 85 -519. Consequently, upon termination of this employment, you would hecome a "former puhlic employee" subject to Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act provides that: Section 3. Restricted activities. (e) No former official or puhlic employee shall represent a person, with or without compensation, on any matter before the governmental horsy with which he has heen associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 F.S. 403. From the description and analysis of your duties and responsibilities and hased upon the facts outlined ahove, your jurisdiction, responsibility, influence and control appears to have heen exercised within the Office of State Senator Pecora. Thus, the "governmental body" with which you have heen "associated" upon the termination of your employment would he the Office of Senator Pecora, hereinafter the Office. Therefore, within the first year after you would leave the Senate, Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act would apply and restrict your "representation" of persons or new employers vis -a -vis the Office. It appears as though you terminated your association with the OLI and with the State Senate Agricultrue and Rural Affairs Committee more than one year ago and, as a result, there would he no further restriction imposed upon your dealings with those particular entities. Mathew J. Steck November 18, 1485 Page The Fthics Act would not affect your ahility to appear before agencies or entities other than with respect to the office. Likewise, there is no general limitation on the type of employment in which you may engage, following your departure from the Senate. We do note, however, that the conflicts of interest law is primarily concerned with financial conflicts and violations of the public trust. The intent of the law generally is that during the teem of a person's puhlic employment he must act consistently with the puhlic tust and upon departure from the public sector, that individual should not allowed to utilize his association with the puhlic sector, officials or employees to secure for himself or a new employer, treatment or hens its that may he ohtainahle only hecause of his association with his former pAWc employer. See, Anderson, 83-014; Zwikl, 85 -004, In respect to the one year representation restriction the Ethscs. Commission has promulgated regulations to define "representation" s rolows: Section 1.1. Definitions. Representation - -- Any act on behalf of any person including hut not limited to the following activities: personal appearances, negotiating contracts, lobbying, F.nd suhmitting hid or contract proposals which are signed hy or contain the name of the former puhlic official or public employe. 51 Pa. Code 1.1. The Commission, in its opinions, has also interpreted the tern "representation" as used in Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act to pr•ohihit: 1. Personal appearances hefore the governmental hody or hodis °: ith which you have heen associated, (that is the Office), including, hut not limited to, negotiations or renegotiations on contracts with the Office; 2. Attempts to influence the Office; 3. Participating in any matters before the Office over which you had supervision, direct involvement, or responsibility while employed hy the Senate; 4. Lobbying, that is representing the interests of any person or employer before the Office in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. lae, Russell, 80 -048 and Seltzer, 80 -044. The Commission has also held that preparing and signing a proposal, document or hid, or listing your name as the person who will provide technical assistance on such proposal, document, or hid, if submitted to or reviewed hy the Office, constitutes an attempt to influence your former governmental body. See, Kilareski, 80 -054. Therefore, within the first year after you leave the Senate, you should not engage in the type of activity outlined above. Mathew J. Steck November 18, 1986 Page 4 You may, assist in the preparation of any documents presented to the office so long as you are not identified as the preparer. You may also counsel any person regarding that person's appearance before the Office. Once again, however, your activity in this respect should not he revealed, to the Office. Of course, any han under the Ethics Act would not prohibit or preclude you from making general informational inquiries of the Office to secure information which is availahle to the general puhlic. See, Cutt, 79 -023. This, of course, must not he Hone in an effort to indirectly influence these entities or to otherwise make known to the Office your representation of, or work for your new employer. Finally, the Commission has concluded that if you are administering an existing contract as opposed to negotiating or renegotiating a contract, your activities would not he prohibited hy the Ethics Act. See, Talton, RO -056 and Reaser, R1 -538. Additionally, we note that Section 403(h) of the State Ethics Act would prohibit any puhlic employee or public official from accepting a position of employment if said position has heen offered hased upon the understanding that the official conduct of the employee or official, while working for his former governmental body, was influenced hy such offer. See 65 P.S. 5403(h). Conclusion: As a Legislative Assistant in the State Senate, you are to he considered a "puhlic employee" as defined in the Ethics Act. Upon termination of your service with the Pennsylvania State Senate, you would become a "former public employee" suhject to the restrictions imposed hy Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act. As such, your conduct should conform to the requirements of the Ethics Act as outliners ahove. Your governmental body for the purpose of the one year representation restriction is the Office of State Senator Frank A. Pec o ra . Further, should you terminate your employment or service, as outlined above, you are reminded that the Ethics Act also requires you to file a Statement of Financial Interests for the year following your termination of service. Pursuant to Section 7(q)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated hy the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a puhlic record and will he made availahle as such. Mathew J. Steck Novemher 18, 1QR6 Page 5 Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance hefore the Commission will he scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will he issued. Any such appeal must he made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.1?, Si n rely, John J. ;ont no rene •. Counsel