HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-534 DotterMr. Gerald L. Dotter
634 Center Street
Jim Thorpe, PA 18229
Dear Mr. Dotter:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 11470
HARRISBURG, PA 17108 -1470
TELEPHONE (717) 783 -1610
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
April 4, 1986
Re: Contracting, Public Employee, Family Memhers
86 - 534
This responds to your letter of March 6, 1986, wherein you requested the
advice of the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: Whether the brother of a public employee may submit bids to obtain a
contract from the governmental body employing said public employee.
Facts: You advise that you are currently employed by the Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation as the Assistant County Maintenance Manager in
District 5 -0. You further advise that your hrother, the owner of the Penn
Forest Garage, in Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania, is interested in being added to
the department's bidding list. Being added to this list would allow your
brother to submit proposals regarding rental equipment contracts that are put
out by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Your brother is the
owner of the Penn Forest Garage and you have indicated that you have no
interest, financial or otherwise, in this company. Your brother does not live
with you and is not dependent upon you. You further advise that in your
position with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation you have no duties
or responsibilities in relation to the award of the rental equipment
contracts. You have requested the advice of the State Ethics Commission in
relation to this issue and you seek a determination as to whether the State
Ethics Act presents any prohibition upon your brother bidding on the
aforementioned contracts.
Discussion: At the outset, it must he noted that the State Ethics Commission
may address your question only within the purview of the State Ethics Act. 65
P.S. 5401 et. seq. As such, this Commission will not address this issue under
any other code of conduct, such as the State Adverse Interest Act, the
Governor's Code of Conduct or any internal codes of a similar nature.
Mr. Gerald L. Dotter
April 4, 1986
Page 2
Generally, as an Assistant County Maintenance Manager employed by the
Pennsylania Department of Transportation, you are a public employee as that
term is defined in the State Ethics Act. 65 P.S. i$402. As such, your conduct
must conform to the requirements of the State Ethics Act.
Generally, the State Ethics Act provides as follows:
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(a) No public official or public employee shall use his
public office or any confidential information received
through his holdi ng public office to obtain financial gai n
other than compensation provided by law for himself, a
member of his immediate family, or a business with which
he is associated. 65 P.S. 403(a).
Within the above provision of law, no public official may use his position in
order to obtain any financial gain for himself or any member of his immediate
family or for any business with which he is associated. A member of one's
immediate family is defined as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Immedi ate family." A spouse residi ng i n the person's
household and minor dependent children. 65 P.S. 402.
Additionally, the State Ethics Act defines business with which one is
associated as follows:
Section 2. Definitions.
"Business with which he is associated." Any business in
which the person or a member of the person's immediate
family is a director, officer, owner, employee or holder
of stock. 65 P.S. 402.
Pursuant to the facts which you have provided, your brother is not a
member of your immediate family within the above definition and you do not
appear to be associated with this particular entity as you have no interest in
the company and are not employed by the company. These factors combined
with the fact that you have no duties or responsibilities in relation to the
award of a contract by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, would
indicate that this section of the State Ethics Act would not present any
prohibition upon your brother's submission of bids to the department. In any
event, should you have such an interest in the Penn Forest Garage, you may not
use your position or any confidential information obtained in that positon to
benefit your brother or his business.
Mr. Gerald L. Dotter
April 4, 1986
Page 3
In addition to the foregoing, the State Ethics Act contains certain
restrictions in relation to the award of contracts to public employees.
Section 3. Restricted activities.
(c) No public official or public employee or a member of
his immediate family or any business in which the person
or a member of the person's immediate family is a
director, officer, owner or holder of stock exceeding 5%
of the equity at fair market value of the business shall
enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with a
governmental body unless the contract has been awarded
through an open and public process, including prior public
notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals
considered and contracts awarded. Any contract made in
violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court
of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within
90 days of making of the contract. 65 P.S. 403(c).
In the instant situation, you have provided information that indicates
that you are neither an officer, director, or owner of more than 5% of the
equity at fair market value of the business in question. Additionally, it
does not appear as though you or any member of your immediate family would be
personally contracting with the department. As such, it does not appear as
though the open and public process requirements of Section 3(c) would be
applicable in the instant situation. In any event, should you stand in the
relation to this company as set forth above, the above provision of law would
not prohibit your brother from submitting bids in relation to contracts
awarded by the department. While no absolute prohibition will be placed upon
you brother, there may be certain standards which must be met in relation to
the award of this contract if you stand in the relation to this business as
set forth in Section 3(c) of the Act. These standards would include the
f o l l owi ng:
1. Prior public notice of the employment or contracting possibility;
2. Sufficient time for a reasonable and prudent competitor /applicant to
be able to prepare and present an application or proposal;
3. Public disclosure of all applications or proposals considered;
4. Public disclosure of the contract awarded or offered and accepted.
See Howard, 79 -044; Fields, 82 -006; Cantor, 82 -004.
In addition to the foregoing, Section 403(d) of the State Ethics Act
authorizes this Commission to address other areas of possible conflict. In
the event that you, as a public employee, would have some role in relation to
the business that would be obtained by your brother should he be successful in
his bidding attempts, then as a public employee you may not participate to any
Mr. Gerald L. Dotter
April 4, 1986
Page 4
degree in the department's actions related to the negotiation, award, approval
or monitoring or administration of this particular contract. In this way, you
would avoid all possible conflicts of interests.
Finally, in order to be complete, we note that all public officials and
employees must comply with Section 3(b) of the State Ethics Act which
prohibits said officials or employees from offering or accepting anything of
value based upon the understanding that their official conduct would be
influenced thereby.
C. Conclusion: The State Ethics Act presents no per se or absolute
prohipition upon a brother of a public employee bidding on and receiving a
contract with the governmental entity with which the employee is associated.
If you, as a public employee, have any duties in relation to your governmental
body's award or monitoring of this contract you must abstain from
participation therein. Additionally, if you have any interest in the company
that is bidding on this contract or in the work that is to be performed by
this company, you must comply with the open and public process requirements of
Section 3(c) and the abstention requirements of Section 3(a) of the State
Ethics Act. Finally, we note that the State Ethics Commission does not
address any restrictions that may be placed upon you or your brother's
attempts to bid on this contract under other provisions of law as noted
previously.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained
of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A
personal appearance before the Commission w i l l be scheduled and a formal
Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 2.12.
Si ncerely,
C� L
o n 3. .ntino
Gene Counsel