Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-617 RiggsLarry Riggs RD #2, Box 192 Turbotville, PA 17772 Dear Mr. Riggs: Marling Address STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P.O. BOX 1 179 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610 November 23, 1983 ADVICE OF COUNSEL RE: Financial Interest Statement, Civil Engineer 1I B3-617 This responds to your letter received by the Ethics Commission on July 26, 1983, in which you requested that the Ethics Commission review the Office of Administration determination regarding your status as a "public employee" for purposes of filing a Financial Interest Statement under the State Ethics Act. Issue: You ask whether, as a Civil Engineer II with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDot) you file a Financial Interest Statement with the State Ethics Commission. Facts: You are a Civil Engineer II with PennDot. Your job description indicates that you perform a variety of engineering and technical duties relating to in -depth inspection of less complex structures within a metropolitan district. Your duties include inspecting bridges for elements such as accident damages, water scouring of footers, wear and corrosion of pins and other bridge parts. You also prepare reports from inspections and make recommendations for repair, replacement, or rehabilitation. With respect to these recommendations, you also provide a recommendation regarding the priority of repair work to be completed. You prepare a stress analysis for bridges, compute capacities for bridges and perform other related duties as required. It should also be noted that although this most current appeal from an Office of Administration determination has been presented to us as of July 26, 1983, we have previously addressed a letter to you dated October 31, 1980. See Riggs, 80 -14A (80 -549). In regard to this Advice of Counsel referenced above, you were advised that you were a "public employee" and required to file a Financial Interest Statement under the State Ethics Act. We based this determination on a job description which was substantially the same as the job description which you have presented for our review at this point. It should also be noted that in the Advice dated October 31, 1980, you were told that if you disagreed with the Advice or if you had any reason to challenge the Advice, you could request that the full Commission review the Advice. State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylyaiir• Larry Riggs November 23, 1983 Page 2 Additionally, you were told that a request for such a review and an expression of disapproval of the Advice should have been presented within 30 days of the Advice that was issued. The Ethics Commission has no record of any expression of disapproval or "appeal" from the Advice issued to you on October 31, 1980. Discussion: The Advice which was issued on October 31, 1980 and from which no appeal was taken or expression of disapproval was received by,this office is final and cannot be disturbed at this time absent some change in the factual context under which that Advice was issued.. The job description that was presented as a basis for the rendering the October 31, 1980 Advice and the job description which you have submitted to us for our review with respect to your most recent "appeal" are substantially the same. Thus, there is no factual basis upon which we would alter our determination as previously issued on October 31, 1980. We are not in a position, given the lack of difference in factual presentation at this time to reopen the Advice that was previously issued to you on October 31, 1980. Accordingly, you should comply with that Advice and we will not entertain any further appeal from that Advice at this point in time having determined that the factual context which you have presented to us for review is substantially the same as that which has been previously ruled upon by this Commission. Conclusion: Having been presented with no evidence of a substantial change in the factual context under which the original determination and Advice issued to you on October 31, 1980 was based, we will not, at this point in time, entertain any further review of this question whether presented in the context of an appeal from that Advice or in the context of an appeal from any new determination to you from the Office of Administration or otherwise. The Advice previously issued to you, referenced above, should be complied with and as you are considered a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act you should have filed and should be filing a Financial Interest Statement for each year in which you serve as a "public employee" and for the year following the termination of your service with the Commonwealth. Such a Statement should be filed by May 1 of each year in which you serve with PennDot. If you have not already done so, a Financial Interest Statement should be filed within 15 days of the receipt of this Advice representing the filing that was required by May 1, 1983. Forms are enclosed for your use. You should file the original with your personnel office, the yellow copy with our office in order to insure compliance with this Advice and retain the green copy for your records. Larry Riggs November 23, 1983 Page 3 Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. SSC /rdp Enclosure cc: Bruce Doman Sharon Wright Cheryl Cohen Ken Bausinger Sincerely, Sandra S. Christianson General Counsel