HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-564 KudyMr. Benjamin Kuby
Klovsky, Kuby & Harris
Independence Mall
431 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
At
Mailing Address
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1 179
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610
June 20, 1983
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
RE: Outside Income Reporting, Section 405(b)(5)
Dear Mr. Kuby:
83 -564
This responds to your letter of May 26, 1983, in which you, as Attorney
for Doctor Leonard B. Finkelstein, requested advice from the State Ethics
Commission.
Issue: You ask whether your client, Doctor Finkelstein, properly listed the
sources of his outside income on his Financial Interest Statement.
Facts: You represent Doctor Leonard B. Finkelstein, Superintendent of Schools
of the Cheltenham Township School District in Montgomery County. Doctor
Finkelstein, as a Science Educator, served on the Energy Education Advisory
Council hereinafter, the Council, was formed and is funded by the Philadelphia
Electric Company. In connection with the service on the Council, Doctor
Finkelstein also engaged in staff development consultation work for '
Philadelphia Electric. All such services were performed on Doctor
Finkelstein's own time and without use of School District personnel. For both
his services on the Council and his work as a consultant, Doctor Finkelstein
was paid directly by the Philadelphia Electric Company.
You indicate that prior to Doctor Finkelstein's employment by the
Cheltenham School District, his activities with Philadelphia Electric were
disclosed to the then President of the School Board, but recently, questions
have been posed to Doctor Finkelstein by certain Cheltenham Township School
Board members, concerning whether he properly listed the sources of his income
on his Financial Interest Statement. :You, therefore, have requested a ruling
from the State Ethics Commission in this regard.
State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Mr. Benjamin Kuby
June 20, 1983
Page 2
Discussion: The Pennsylvania State Ethis Act, 65 P.S. 401 et seq., was
enacted to insure the public that "the financial interests of holders of or
candidates for public office present neither a conflict nor the appearance of
a conflict with the public trust." As Superintendent of Schools in Cheltenham
Township, your client is a "public employee" subject to the provisions of the
Ethics Act. See 65 P.S. 402.
In order to insure that the goals of the Act are promoted, Section
405(b)(5) of the Act provides that the Statement of Financial Interest shall
include, with regard to the filer and his immediate family,
(5) The name and adress of any person who is the direct
or indirect source of income totalling in the aggregate of
$500 or more .... 65 P.S. 405(b)(5).
As such, the Act requires that the filer report:
a. Not the amount, but the fact, of income totalling in the aggregate of
$500 or more, and
b. The direct or indirect source of that income.
Based on the facts as you present, it can be stated that Doctor
Finkelstein's participation as a member of the Energy Education Advisory
Council constitutes the activity nhich generated income. However, the source
of that income, whether direct or indirect, is the Philadelphia Electric
Company. You indicate that the Philadelphia Electric Company was also the
source of remuneration for Doctor Finkelstein's services as a consultant.
Therefore, the Philadelphia Electric Company was the source, direct or
indirect, of the income from both activities, and it is not accurate to list
the Energy Education Advisory Council as the source of income rather. than the
Philadelphia Electric Company.
With regard to the adequacy of the information disclosed by Doctor
Finkelstein on his Financial Interest Statement, while his listing of the
Energy Education Advisory Council indicates the activity undertaken, the
listing of the Council as a source of income is not entirely correct. Proper
reporting under the Ethics Act requires him to report the Philadelphia
Electric Company as the source of income from both the Advisory Council
activities and a consultant. Should Doctor Finkelstein prefer to list the
Philadelphia Electric Company as the source of income for his consulting work
and as a separate source of income for his work on the Advisory Council for
whatever reasons, he is at liberty to do so, but it should be pointed out that
the Act requires disclosure of the name and address of any person who is the
source of income totalling in the aggregate of $500 or more -- in this case
Mr. Benjamin Kuby
June 20, 1983
Page 3
CW /rdp
Enclosure
Philadelphia Electic Company. The Act does not require your client to list
the actual sums received but only the fact that he has received $500 or more
from a particular source. Doctor Finkelstein should correct the Financial
Interest Statements he has filed which may not reflect Philadelphia Electric
as a source of income.
Conclusion: Under 65 P.S. 405(b)(5), Doctor Finkelstein should indicate the
name and address of the person, in this case, the Philadelphia Electric
Company, which is the source of direct or indirect income totalling in the
aggregate of $500 or more.
In this case, participation on the Energy Education Advisory Council is
merely the activity which gave rise to Doctor Finkelstein's income, while the
Philadelphia Electric Company is the actual source of that income. In this
regard, Doctor Finkelstein should file amendments to his Financial INterest
Statement which list the Philadelphia Electric Company rather than the Energy
Education Advisory Council as a source of income.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained
of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal
Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 2.12.
Sincerely,
andra S. Chr stianson
General Coun el