HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-558 OBrienMichael C. O'Brien
11 Jewel Lane
Levittown, PA 19055
Dear Mr. O'Brien:
Mailing Address.
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1 179
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610
June 2, 1983
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
83 -558.
RE: Field Auditor III, Liquor Control Board, Financial Interest Filing
This reponds to your appeal from the Office of Budget and Administration
decision that you must file a Financial Interest Statement.
Issue: You question whether you, as a Field Auditor III, serving with the
Liquor Control Board (LCB) are subject to the financial reporting and
disclosure requirements of the State Ethics Act.
Facts: Initially, we must note that on April 8, 1981, you had originally
appealed your inclusion within the category of "public employees" subject to
the financial reporting and disclosure requirements of the State Ethics Act in
your capacity as a Field Auditor III, with the LCB. On June 1, 1981, the
personnel director within the Governor's Office of Administration agreed with
you that you should not be required to file a Financial Interest Statement.
However, in 1982, you were apparently requested to execute and file a
Financial Interest Statement. In response to this requirement, you filed an
initiated an appeal on April 12, 1982. This appeal was based primarily on the
reasoning that you were involved in internal auditing only, with no official
responsibility to communicate with the public and, therefore, according to the
directives of the Office of Administration, you felt that you were exempt from
the disclosure and filing requirements. However, by letter dated July 15,
1982, the Office of Administration reviewed this situation and determined that
you were an individual who, in their estimation, fell within the category of
"public employee" and, therefore, they required you to file a Financial
Interest Statement. On August 5, 1982, you were informed of your right to
appeal directly to the State Ethics Commission to resolve this dispute and on
August 12, 1982, you initiated such an appeal.
State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Michael C. O'Brien
June 2, 1983
Page 2
The position description which you have signed as your official job
description indicates that your primary responsibility as a Field Auditor III
is to insure that the assets of the Commonwealth are adequately safeguarded.
These assets include cash, liquor inventory, equipment, postage, supplies, and
real estate. In performing your jub you conduct on -site audits to account for
these assets, submitting records and reports to determine and establish the
accuracy of the report and compliance with prescribed procedures. In this
process you are also required to review the records of licensed establishments
which are audited to determine if they are in compliance with the established
procedures. Your report of excessive losses, cash or inventory discrepancies,
or suspected theft results in a full investigation and disciplinary action is
taken against the appropriate party if sufficient evidence gathered after such
investigation to warrant such action.
At the end of an audit an narrative report listing the results and
recommendations along with the work papers you have compiled are submitted to
the supervisor and forwarded to the director and the comptroller. In
addition, you may receive special assignments as required. In this area it is
notable that the LCB contracts for warehousing liquor at five different
locations throughout the Commonwealth and that shipments from warehouses to
state stores, the pick -up and delivery or receipts from state stores to banks,
are also the responsibility of the comptroller's office in relation to
investigations of suspected fraud or compliance with these contract
provisions. Given the large potential for dollar value loss due to fraud or
negligence the comptroller is required to investigate perceived irregularities _
and such investigations, including licensee audits, are assigned to the field
staff of state store audit programs with which you are associated. The
obvious sophistication required in such investigations and audits results in
the special assignments being made to Field Auditor III's.
While the day -to -day assignments of a Field Auditor III are primarily
internal auditing, these special audit assignments which cannot be adequately
predicted in advance, are within the purview of your responsibility.
In addition, the classification specifications for a Field Auditor III,
which are incorporated herein by reference, indicate that an incumbent in this
position engages in complex or supervisory auditing work in examining the
books and financial records of governmental agencies or private businesses.
These specifications also indicate that public contact is involved in making
audits of private firms and in explaining legal provisions to taxpayers.
Also, this work is generally performed with considerable independence and
review of this person's work is limited to occasional conferences and periodic
analysis of written reports and forms.
Michael C. O'Brien
June 2, 1983
Page 3
Discussion: The main question to be addressed in the context of this appeal
is whether or not the State Ethics Commission, in accordance with its rules,
regulations, and prior opinions, considers you a "public employee" as that
term is defined in the Ethics Act. We note that the prior conclusions of the
Office of Administration, whether or not they agree or disagree with this
conclusion or are internally consistent, are not the prime subject of our
review here. Our review is to be conducted on an independent and de nova
basis.
However, our conclusion is based upon a review of the classification
specifications applicable to a Field Auditor III, your particular job and
position description, the organizational chart accompanying same, and your
representations as well as those of the Office of Administration in relation
to the functions you performed. Finally, our review entails an application of
these items in light of the definition of "public employee" as contained in
the Ethics Act and re- printed below as follows:
"Public employee." Any individual employed by the
Commonwealth or a political subdivision who is responsible
for taking or recommending official action of a
nonministerial nature with regard to:
(1) contracting or procurement;
(2) administering or monitoring grants or
subsidies;
(3) planning or zoning;
(4) inspecting, licensing, regulating or auditing
any person; or
(5) any other activity where the official action
has an economic impact of greater than a de
minimus nature on the interests of any person.
"Public employee" shall not include individuals who are
employed by the State or any political subdivision thereof
in teaching as distinguished from administrative duties.
65 P.S. 402.
Also important to are review is the definition contained in the
regulations of the State Ethics Commission as follows:
Inspecting, licensing, regulating, or auditing - -- The
normal meanings of the terms apply, but the terms do not
include activities which are exclusively internal in
nature such as auditing the internal process of an
organization; clerical and procedural activities in
issuing permits and licenses are not included in the
terms. 51 Pa. Code 1.1 (emphasis added).
Michael C. O'Brien
June 2, 1983
Page 4
It clear from the definition of public employee as set forth above
that a person who makes recommendations or takes action of a non - ministerial
nature with regard to inspecting, licensing or auditing, as in your case,
would generally be included within the definition of the term "public
employee" and, therefore, subject to the financial reporting and disclosure
provisions of the Ethics Act. In reviewing your position description, the
classification specifications of a Field Auditor III and the information
provided by_the Office of Administration, we are compelled to conclude that
ylu do take or recommend official action of a non - ministerial nature with
respect to auditing so as to bring you within the purview of the definition of
"public employee." Specifically, in making this determination we rely on the
fact that the auditing function that you perform is not exclusively internal
in nature. It is clear that, on occasion, you have the responsibility to and
may be called upon to perform audits of private businesses or entities which
contracts with the LCB. In this function, you are clearly involved in
external auditing or auditing of processes and persons other than the
"internal process of an organization."
It is significant to note that the quotation which you rely upon in your
appeal is derived from the directives of the Office of Administration. These
directives, while derived from the - Ethics Act and the regulations of the
Commission, represent only the interpretation of the Office of Administration
and do not reflect either the provisions of the Ethics Act exactly or the
content of the regulations of this Commission specifically. Thus, the
indication in the directive of the Office of Administration that a person
would not be "covered by the Ethics Act if he was involved in internal
auditing and has no official responsibility to communicate with the public" is
not to be taken as the official response of this Commission nor can it be said
to be derived from the Ethics Act, the regulations promulgated thereunder, or
the decisions of this Commission.
Relying on our regulations and recognizing that you are not, according to
either your position description or the classification specifications
applicable to your position, "exclusively" involved in internal auditing, we
must conclude that you have the duty and responsibility as a "public employee"
to file a Financial Interest Statement as required by the Ethics Act.
Conclusion: As a Field Auditor III assigned to the LCB you fall within the
definition of "public employee" as set forth in the Ethics Act and as such
must comply with the financial reporting and disclosure provisions of said
Act. If you have not already done so, you must file Financial Interest
Statements as required by this Act for all the years that you served with the
LCB and such filings should be completed within 15 days of the issuance of
this Advice. Forms are enclosed for your use. Please return the original of
this form to your personnel office, provide a copy to this office to insure
compliance with this Advice, and retain the last copy for your records.
Michael C. O'Brien
June 2, 1983
Page 5
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained
of in reliance on the Advice given.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal
Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 2.12.
SSC /rdp
Enclosures
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
cc: Daniel Pennick, Chairman
Liquor Control Board
Sincerely,
S.ndra S. C ` jistianson
General Cou el