HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-536 OConnellMr. John M. O'Connell
O'Connell & Silvis
131 West Pittsburgh Street
Greensburg, PA 15601
Mailing Address.
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1 179
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610
April 11, 1983
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
RE: Sewage Authority Member as Authority Business Manager
Dear Mr. O'Connell:
g3 Co
This responds to your letter of January 28, 1983, in which you as the
Solicitor for the Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority requested advice from
the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: You ask whether a member of the Authority Board may hold the position
as Authority Business Manager, and whether Board members who have applied for
the position as Business Manager may participate in the selection process.
Facts: You are the Solicitor for the Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority.
You state that the Authority Business Manager recently passed away, and that
the Authority has advertised for applications to fill the vacancy of Manager
of the Authority. You indicate that one or more of the Authority Board
members may be interested in applying for the job as Business Manager, which
is a compensated, full -time position. Authority Board members are not
full -time employees, but they receive monthly compensation for acting as Board
members.
You state that the Authority is concerned with whether a member of the
Authority Board may simultaneously serve as the Authority Business Manager,
and whether Board members who have applied for the position of Business
Manager may participate to any extent in the selection process.
Discussion: Initially, the Ethics Commission notes that the compensated
members of the Board of the Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority are "public
officials" within the definition of that term under the Ethics Act. See 65
P.S. 402 and Forney v. State Ethics Commission, Pa. Cmwlth. , 425 A.2d
66 (1981). As such, they are subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and
must conform their conduct to its requirements, 65 P.S. 401 et seq.
State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Mr. John M. O'Connell
April 11, 1983,
Page 2
The Ethics Act requires the Board members to avoid conflicts of interest
or even the appearance of a conflict of interest. See 65 P.S. 401 and 403.
However, in its opinion in Alfano, 80 -007, the Commission indicated that
serving or holding two positions would constitute a conflict of interest only
where the individual in such service would represent the interests of two or
more persons whose interests are adverse to one another. Certainly the
interests of the Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority and its Business Manager
can hardly be construed as having adverse interests since they are essentially
the same entity. Therefore, a Board member who might also serves as the
Authority Business Manager would encounter no inherent conflict of interest.
Of course, any Board member who also served as Business Manager would
have to abstain from all participation in discussion or votes on any matter
placed before the Board by him as Business Manager, but as long as abstention
is complete, there is not even the appearance of a conflict of interest.
You have inquired whether Board members must resign from the Board prior
to, at, or subsequent to the time they submit their applications for Business
Manager or are indeed appointed to that position. As indicated above, there
is no need to resign as a member of the Board if the member appointed to act
as Business Manager can effectively abstain from participation as a Board
member in matters placed before the Board by him as Business Manager. With
regard to resignation prior to or at the time of application, Section 3(c) of
the Ethics Act mandates no such action.
As you have indicated, the Authority has advertised for applications to
fill the vacancy of Business Manager. Section 3(c), 65 P.S. 403(c), provides
that no public official, member of his immediate family or any business in
which the person has an interest greater than 5% of the equity at fair market
value may contract with a governmental body unless the contract, valued at
$500 or more, is awarded through an open and public process. In its opinion
in Howard, 79 -044, the Commission stated that an open and public process meets
the following criteria:
(1) prior public notice; and
(2) public disclosure of all proposals considered; and
(3) public disclosure of the award of the contract.
If these open and public process requirements are complied with, there is
no need for a Board member to resign in order to be considered for the
position as Business Manager so long as he further conforms his conduct to the
requirements of the Ethics Act, especially Section 3(a) and (b).
Mr. John M. O'Connell
April 11, 1983,
Page 3
Section 3(a), 65 P.S. 403(a), prohibits any public employee or official
from using his public office or employment or confidential information
received through public employment /office to receive financial gain for
himself, his family, or a business with which he is associated. In addition,
Section 3(b), 65 P.S. 403(b), precludes a person from offering a public
official or employee any thing of value, including a promise of future
employment, based on the understanding that his official action would be
influenced thereby.
In light of these provisions, as well as the overriding interest in
preventing both conflicts and the appearance of conflicts of interest, any
Board member who has applied for the position as Business Manager would be
precluded from participation in any manner in the selection process for that
position. He may neither vote for or against himself or any other candidate
for the position, nor may he participate in any discussions on the matter.
Conclusion: A Member of the Authority Board may serve simultaneously as the
Authority Business Manager so long as he can effectively abstain from
participation in matters set before the Board by him as Authority Business
Manager.
Members of the Board who apply for the position as Business Manager need
not resign from the Board prior to or at the time of their application so long
as they comply with the provisions of the Ethics Act and the open and public
process requirements of Section 3(c) of the Ethics Act are met.
Members of the Board who do apply for the Business Manager position must
abstain from all participation in the selection process as discussed above.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained
of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal
Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 2.12.
CW /rdp
Sincerely,
a tibal J Y 7
dra S. Christianson
General Counsel