HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-516 Clanceys
Mr. Michael T. Clancey
c/o Thomas J. Clancey
644 Gold Avenue
Erie, PA 16509
Mailing Address:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1179
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610
March 1, 1983
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
RE: Former Department of Revenue Counsel, Section 3(e)
Dear Mr. Clancey:
83 -516
State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
This responds to your letter of December 10, 1982, at which time you
requested advice from the State Ethics Commission.
Issue: You request advice as to whether you, as a prior law clerk and
assistant counsel for the Legal Bureau of the Department of Revenue (Revenue),
may enter into employment as a staff attorney for G. C. Murphy Company
(Murphy) without involving a conflict or the appearance of a conflict of
interest under the State Ethics Act.
Facts: You were employed by the Legal Bureau of the Department of Revenue
since June, 1979. Until August, 1981, you worked part -time and summers as a
law clerk while attending the Dickinson School of Law. From August, 1981
until December, 1982, you worked full -time as an assistant counsel. You
resigned at the end of December, 1982, to accept employment with the G. C.
Murphy Company, to begin in January, 1983.
While employed by Revenue, your primary responsibilities were in handling
legal matters pertaining to the Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax and the
Realty Transfer Tax. You have occasionally been assigned projects in other
tax areas, such as Sales Tax, Public Utility Realty Tax and various corporate
taxes. Your specific duties as an assistant counsel included preparation of
internal advice memoranda, providing oral guidance to taxpayers and Revenue
personnel, preparation of "private letter" rulings, preparation of chief
counsel memoranda for publication, writing regulations, review and re- writing
of tax instruction booklets, reviewing and counter - briefing cases of the Board
of Finance and Revenue, attending settlement conferences for cases being
litigated by the Attorney General's Office, and other miscellaneous duties.
Mr. Michael T. Clancey
c/o Thomas J. Clancey
March 1, 1983
Page 2
Your new position with Murphy is as a staff attorney in the legal
department. You are responsible for legal representation of the corporation
in such areas as real estate law, securities law, anti -trust law, Uniform
Commercial Code law and other areas of commercial or business law. The legal
department does not handle any federal or state tax matters at this time, but
it is possible that these matters will arise in the future.
While you were employed by Revenue, your contacts with Murphy`-were
unofficial in nature, limited to two employment interviews and related
telephone conversations. You have never been involved in any matter
concerning Murphy in your official capacity as a Revenue law clerksor
assistant counsel.
Discussion: Initially, the Ethics Commission notes that, as a stautory
entity, its jurisdiction and its power is strictly limited to the authority
granted it in 65 P.S. §401 et seq. Thus, it has no authority to interpret
and /or enforce the provisions of other codes such as the Canons of Ethics and
does not address the effect of those Canons on your conduct.
On September 28, 1981, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania granted
summary judgement in the case of P.U.C. Bar Association v. Thornburgh, Pa.
Cmwltha , 434 A.2d 1327, which was affirmed on June 17, 1982, by the ,
Pennsylvania Supreme Court at Pa. . In that case, the Court found
Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act unconstitutional as applied to attorneys.
Section 3(e) of the Act provides:
No former official or public employee shall represent
a person, with or without compensation, on any matter
before the governmental body with which he has been
associated for one year after he leaves that body.
In light of the Court's decision, Section 3(e) no longer applies to you
as an attorney. So long as you represent G. C. Murphy in your capacity as an
attorney, the Ethics Commission does not have the power to regulate your
conduct. You are thus relegated to the Code of Professional Responsibility as
adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, specifically Canon 5.
Conclusion: In light of recent Pennsylvania Court decisions, your conduct as
an attorney for G.C. Murphy is not regulable under Section 3(e) of the Ethics
Act.
Mr. Michael T. Clancey
c/o Thomas J. Clancey
March 1, 1983
Page 3
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any
enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith
conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained
of in reliance on the Advice given.
Thi letter is a public record and will be made available as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to
challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A
personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and atformal
Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in
writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant
to 51 Pa. Code 2.12.
CW /rdp
CC: 0b-t -1 - 2jtocrn
Sincerely,
r4
Sandra S. Chri tianson
General Couns.-1