Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout82-598 HochMr. Lance J. Hoch Office of Policy and Planning Governor's Energy Council P.O. Box 8010 1625 N. Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17108 RE: Representation, Restrictions Dear Mr. Hoch: Meiling Address: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P.O. BOX 1179 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610 December 15, 1982 ADVICE OF COUNSEL 82 -598 This is in response to your letter of November 18, 1982, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission regarding your future relations with the Governor's Energy Council (GEC). Issue: You ask what restrictions the Ethics Act will impose upon you as a former employee of GEC in future dealings with GEC after you become a member of a private firm, Synergic Resources Corporation. Facts: You are currently employed as the renewable energy policy specialist in the Bureau of Policy and Planning of the GEC but will soon be leaving to take a position with Synergic Resources Corporation (SRC), an engergy consulting firm in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. This firm has worked on a contractual basis for the GEC in the past and may wish to do so agin. As a renewable energy policy specialist, you report directly to Jan H. Freeman, Associate Director of Energy Policy, who in turns reports to the Executive Director, Robert A. Shinn. In your work for GEC, you have neither reviewed proposals for work to be performed by SRC nor managed or overseen the performance of work by SRC. Upon assuming your position at SRC, you will report directly to the President, Pilip R. Limaye. You will be employed on the corporate technical staff and will assist the President of the firm in the oversight and performance of contractual work by coordinating the work of other staff members and by contributing your own research and writing. State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Mr. Lance J. Hoch December 15, 1982 Page 2 Discussion: The Ethics Act, at 65 P.S. 401 et seq. regulates the conduct of both present and former public employees to assure the public of the independence and impartiality of its servants. We assume, that you fall within the definition of "public employee" set forth in the Ethics Act and your job description supports that assumption. Several restrictions on representation are delineated under Section 3(e), which provides: No former official or public employee shall represent a person, with or without compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. 65 P.S. 403(e). With this restriction in mind, a discussion of what the term "representation ", in relation to Section 3(e) of the Ethics Act, means in your situation is in order. In general, the Commission has determined that the prohibition of Section 3(e) relating to "representation" extends to such activities as: 1. Personal appearances before the governmental body with which you were associated, including, but not limited to, negotiation on contracts with that body; 2. Attempts to influence that body; 3. Participating in any manner before your forem governmental body in any case over which you had supervision, direct involvement, or responsibility while employed by the governmental body; 4. Lobbying, that is, representing the interests of any person before that governmental body to influence that body in relation to legislation, regulations, etc. Kilareski, 80 -054. Opinions of the Commission indicate that a former public employee may appear in a third forum such as State or Federal Court, may make general informational inquiries of the nature made by the public of their former governmental body, and may utilize the knowledge and expertise gained in their tenure as public employees, except as set forth above. You may administer contracts between GEC and SRC which exist or which are awarded in accordance with the above restrictions. Mr. Lance J. Hoch December 15, 1982 Page 3 While you are apparently cognizant of the restrictions placed on you with regard to contract work and are planning to abide by them, they will be delineated here for the record. The Commission has held that within the scope of No. 1 outlined above a former employee may not leave his position and then sign and submit bid proposals using his own name to his former governmental body within a one -year period. Dalton, 80 -056. The fact that you might sign or prepare a bid proposal, or that your name might appear as an employee who will serve on the contract if awarded is within the prohibition of an "attempt to influence" the former governmental body with which you were associated. Prior Commission opinions make it clear that you may not prepare and sign as preparer and file such a proposal. You may assist in preparing such items where another person signs as the preparer, but the mere fact that your name may be referred to as someone who will work on the project or as someone who will provide technical assistance is within the scope of "attempting to influence" your former governmental body, and, as such, is prohibited for the one -year period. Finally, the "governmental body" with which you have been associated must be identified because any restrictions as to representation apply only to that body. We find GEC was the governmental body with which you were associated. Conclusion: You are a former public employee and your conduct as such is to be guided by this advice. You may not, for a one -year period following departure from state service, engage in the activites outlined above. Specifically, you may not: 1. Personally appear before the governmental body with which you were associated, ie., GEC; this includes negotiating any contract with that governmental body and signing and submitting under your own name any proposals to be reviewed by that body or allowing your name to be listed in such proposals. 2. Attempt to influence the governmental body as in number one (1) above, and to include lobbying within that restriction. 3. Participate in any manner in any particular case before the body with which you were associated on a matter or contract over which you had supervision, direct involvement or responsibility while you were employed by the governmental body. You nay, within the purview of the Ethics Act, assist in preparing and writing proposals so long as No. 1 above is met and you may administer existing or future contracts which have been awarded to SRC within these guidelines. Mr. Lance J. Hoch December 15, 1982 Page 4 Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. CW /rdp cc: Jay C. Waldman Executive Assistant to the Governor Sincerely, Sandra S. C'istianson General Counsel