HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-652 CampbellLoudon L. Campbell, Esq.
P.O. Box 1188
Harrisburg, PA 17108
Mailing Address:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
P.O. BOX 1 179
HARRISBURG, PA 17108
TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610
December 23, 1981
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
81 -652
RE: Section 3(e); Representative's Administrative Assistant
Dear Mr. Campbell:
This responds to your letter of November 30, 1981, in
which you as counsel to the Pennsylvania Builders Association,
requested an opinion from the Ethics Commission. We note that
Mr. Rhoads is aware of your request for advice and we assume
that you will advise him of this response.
Issue: You requested advice as to the application of the
Ethics Act to a Legislative Assistant to a Pennsylvania State
Representative.
Facts: You informed us that the Pennsylvania Builders Associa-
tion desires to employ Stephen W. Rhoads as its Director of
Governmental Relations. Rhoads will assume this position on
January 18, 1982; he is now employed by the Pennsylvania House
of Representatives. Since August of 1980 Rhoads has been
Legislative Assistant to Representative Ivan Itkin, the Demo-
cratic Chairman of the House Mines and Energy Management
Committee. As a legislative assistant, Rhoads worked on school
tax and finance problems, community development and social
service issues. Occasionally he drafts bills and amendments on
those issues for Representative Itkin but he does not make
policy recommendations to the Committee. Rhoads also handles
the Representative's public relations duties. As a Director of
Governmental Relations for the Builders Association, Rhoads
will be a registered lobbyist.
Discussion: The Ethics Act, 65 P.S. §401 et. seq., imposes
certain restrictions on the conduct of former public employees.
Section 3(e) specifically provides that:
No former ... public employee shall
represent a person, with or without
compensation, on any matter before
Loudon L. Campbell
December 23, 1981
Page 2
the governmental body with which he
has been associated for one year
after he leaves that body. 65 P.S.
§403(e).
Before discussing what Stephen Rhoads is permitted to do
as a former public employee it is necessary. to determine the
extent of the "governmental body" with which he has been
associated. In its decision in Ewing, 79 -010 the Ethics
Commission considered the scope of the term "governmental body"
as applied to a former Director of Intergovernmental Relations
on the staff of the Senate Minority Leader. There the Commis-
sion held that the Former Director's governmental body was the
Minority Leader's office. Analogously, the "governmental body"
with which Rhoads was associated is the office of Representative
Ivan Itkin. See also Georgiadis, 81 -592.
Accordingly, Rhoads may not represent any person, with or
without compensation, before the Representative for one year
after he leaves the Representative's office. The meaning of
"representation" has been interpreted by the Ethics Commission
to preclude the following activities for the one year period:
(1) Personally appearing before the Representative with
. whom Rhoads was associated, including but not limited
to contract negotiations.
(2) Attempting to influence Representative Itkin;
(3) Participating in any manner in a specific case,
matter or contract over which Rhoads had supervision,
direct involvement or responsibility while employed
by the Representative. In order to avoid the
appearance of a conflict of interest forbidden by the
Ethics Act, Rhoads may not lobby on any specific
matter, case or bill over which he had such supervi-
sion, direct involvement or responsibility while with
the Representative. See Dalton, 80 -056 and Adler
79 -043.
(4) Lobbying, that is representing the interest of any
other person, before the Representative as to legis-
lation or regulations. See Russell, 80 -048; Morris,
80 -039.
(5) Signing and submitting under Rhoads' own signature
proposals, contracts or other items to the Represen-
tative.
(6) Including Rhoads' name on a bid proposal submitted to
the Representative as an individual who would
administer a proposed project. Kilareski, 80 - 054
Loudon L. Campbell
December 23, 1981
Page 3
SW /rdp
Rhoads may engage in the following activities:
(1) He may make general informational inquiries of the
Representative if no attempt is made to influence the
Representative as noted above;
(2) Except as noted above, Rhoads may use the knowledge
and experience gained as a public employee.
(3) Rhoads may represent any person before any govern-
mental agency including Representatives other than
Representative Itkin and in third forums except as
noted in No. 3 above.
(4) Rhoads may administer, rather than negociate any
' contract awarded to a future employer so long as that
contract is awarded without his name being included
as in items 5 and 6 above.
Conclusion: As a former public employee your conduct should be
guided by this Advice. The prohibitions and the activities
allowable are noted and should be observed.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the
Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other
civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the
acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available
as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before
the Commission may be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. You should make such a request or
indicate your disapproval of this Advice within the next 30
days.
Sincerely,
c7.2161 Ve,ex,a6,7
a S. %hristianson
General .unsel