Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-571 LarsonRonald Larson, Professor Department of Earth Sciences Edinboro State College Edinboro, PA 16444 Dear Professor Larson: RE: Outside Employment, Expert STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 June 3, 1981 ADVICE OF COUNSEL 81 -571 This responds to your communication of May 27, 1981 in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You inquire whether you can serve as a Geologist to represent property owners in a suit (court action) initiated against the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation ( PennDot). Facts: You currently serve as a Professor in the Department of Earth Sciences for Edinoboro State College. You propose to serve as a geologist- expert in an action filed against the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation by property owners adjacent to the PennDot road salt storage arear in Warren County. The property owners claim that the salt has contaminated their water wells and they are suing the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for damages. Your proposed work for the property owners would be to conduct studies to determine the salt water infiltration level and to testify, we assume, on behalf of the property owners as an expert in the court proceedings, as necessary. Discussion: There is no prohibition under the Ethics Act that would preclude you from accepting such employment as a geologist- expert on behalf of the property owners as described above. While the Ethics Act contains some prohibitions against contracting with the govenmental body with which you are associated (see Section 3(c) of the Ethics Act), the Act does not prohibit a person from conducting outside employment or field work on their own time. The hiring of an expert witness by persons who have no contact with the governmental body with which you are associated, Edinboro State College, is not prohibited by the Ethics Act. Refer to Cohen, 80 -012. Ronald Larson, Professor June 3, 1981 Page 2 Conclusion: The Ethics Act contains no prohibition against your acceptance of the employment as described above. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission may be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. You should make such a request or indicate your disapproval of this Advice within the next 30 days. SSC /rdp dra S. Chr'=tianson General Coun