HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-525 RudnitskySTATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
March 9, 1981
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
Marvin J. Rudnitsky, Esquire 81 -525
Rudnitsky & Woelfel, P.C.
3 South Market Street
Selinsgrove, PA 17870
RE: Conflict of Interest, Borough Council
Dear Mr. Rudnitsky:
This reponds to your letter of January 7, 1981 in which
you, as Selinsgrove Borough Solicitor, requested an opinion
from the Ethics Commission.
Issue: In your letter you requested advice as to whether:
(1) a Borough Councilman may operate as a real estate
salesman;
(2) whether the Borough Councilman who is also a real
estate salesman may advocate changes in zoning bene-
ficial to a client of the Councilman /real estate
agent and;
(3) whether this Councilman /real estate salesman may make
such information available to a client.
Facts: You informed us that a member of the Selinsgrove Borough
Council is also a real estate salesman in the Borough. The
Councilman in question has advocated changes in zoning that
appear to advance the best interests of an apartment owner.
The apartments are managed by the Councilman. Information
available only to Council is apparantly made available to the
Councilman's real estate or other client.
Discussion: As a member of a Borough Council, the individual
you describe is a "public official" within the meaning of the
Ethics Act, 65 P.S. §401 et seq. Section 402 of the Act
provides that a public official is "Any elected or appointed
official in the Executive, Legislative or Judicial Branch of
the State or any political subdivision thereof...." The Act
imposes certain restrictions on the conduct of public officials.
Marvin J. Rudnitsky, Esquire
March 9, 1981
Page 2
The Act does not, however, totally forbid a real estate
as a member of0a050 Borough tCouncil. Act the
salesman from serving ++ _,
Ethics Commission noted in So —fit-laic officials from engaging in
was not designed to preclude p general." Areal estate
business with members of the public in g
salesman cound not, for example, also s full -time proles
s Planning, Building, Zoning
The potential for use and thereea isuseref confidlictial
information in such a case creates Zoning
interest because "It is diffessional PlanninganBuildpng�or
situation in which (the pro
and Code Enforcement Officer) would as saaessan for
Borough property where that property Norris
subject to his review, jurisdiction or decision."
80 -053. The Borough Councilman
pervasive influence l over n every
part of you
partrof the he planning, t h h zoning, inspection and licensing process
as in Norris to create an inherent conflict of interest between
the two roes
Nevertheless, the Councilmember as salesmactmustiobservee
the strictures the Ethics Act places
in ublic office and the use of eooflannofficialopUati0 n as The P
Ethics Act clearly p roscribes us
Councilman to obtain the Acteprohibits a or p tial
80-050. Just as clearly rly to influence the Council
client of the Councilman attempting
man's vote by holding out the promise of future employment.
Id.
Another area of conflict cthateaffect his real
advocates or must vote on matters
clients. The Commission has held thateifotheaColncilma knows
at the time of his vote that he has
expect to be asked to do work f clirthatlhe tilthe
offer services to the particular prospective
Councilman should refrain from voting o nlic e matter and place
the reason for his abstention on P mange
80 -050. Thus, a Councilmenclieuld not vote
reason for o the g absten -
that affects a real estate
should be placed on the public record.
from
The Act also specifically fdentaalainformationlobtained
using his public office or confidential
through holding public office to obtain financial g ain for
himself, his immediate family or he Councilman with which he
associated. 65 P.S. §403(a).
fice as
use confidential information lobtained
so as r to g benefit f himse lf,
Councilman to a real estate c
his immediate family or a business with which he (the Council
man) is associated.
Conclusion: A Borough Councilman is a public official subject
to the Ethics Act. No inherentsconfliatrof ieteaestsisesman.
presented by a Councilman
Marvin J. Rudnitsky, Esquire
March 9, 1981
Page 3
The Councilman must not use his official position to
obtain work as a real estate salesman. Nor may a client of the
Councilman /salesman attempt to influence the Councilman's vote.
If the Councilman knows at the time of an official vote or
action on a matter affecting his real estate client that he has
been or can legitimately expect to be asked to work for the
client or that he will offer his services to that particular`
prospective client, he must abstain from the vote. He must
also place the reason for his abstention on the public record.
The Councilman may not use public office or confidential
information obtained through holding public office to obtain
financial gain for himself, his immediate family or a business
with which he is associated. The Councilman must not provide
such confidential information to a client of his real estate
business.
This discussion is general. Particular circumstances and
activities of individuals which might appear to be contrary to
this advice, of course, would have to be addressed in the
context of a formal complaint proceeding. However, adherence
to this Advice as to future conduct will provide the protections
set forth below as to future conduct.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commis-
sion, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or
criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed
truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts
complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made available
as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have
any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full
Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before
the Commission may be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the
Commission will be issued. You should make such a request or
indicate your disapproval of this Advice within the next 30
days.
SSC /rdp
Sincerely,
Sandra S. C istianson
General Counsel