HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-717 PainterMrs. Laura Painter
Box 92
Claridge, PA 15623
Dear Mrs. Painter:
STATE ETHICS COMMISSION
308 FINANCE BUILDING
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120
October 9, 1980
ADVICE OF COUNSEL
RE: Township Commissioner, Contract, Spouse
80 -717
This responds to the letter of Leslie J. Mlakar, Esquire
of September who wrote to the Ethics Commission requesting
an opinion on your behalf.
Issue: The question raised in that communication is whether
any conflict of interest exists under the Ethics Act where
the spouse of a township commissioner is also an employee of
an engineering firm which may perform contract service work
for-the township.
Facts: The letter indicates that you are an elected town-
ship Commissioner for the Township of Penn, a First -Class
Township located in Westmoreland County. Your husband has
recently been offered a job with an engineering firm, Neilan
Engineers as a laborer and carpenter. Neilan Engineers
periodically performs work for the Township of Penn on a
contract - service basis. These contracts relate to specific
projects, for example, sewer construction and rehabilitation
projects. In addition, Neilan Engineers is involved in
developing applications for community development funds
which may be presented by the Township of Penn.
Discussion: There is no question that as an elected official
in the township you are a "public official" as that term is
defined in the Ethics Act. Therefore, the Ethics Act would
apply to you. The most pertinent provisions of the Ethics
Act are Section 3(a) and 3(c). These sections are repeated
below for easy reference:
Mrs. Laura Painter
October 9, 1980
Page 2
"(a) No public official or public employee
shall use his public office or any
confidential information received
through his holding public office to
obtain financial gain other than
compensation provided by law for
himself, a member of his immediate
family, or a business with which he
is associated."
"(c) No public official or public employee
or a member of his immediate family or
any business in which the person or a
member of the person's immediate family
is a director, officer, owner or holder
of stock exceeding 5% of the equity
at fair market value of the business
shall enter into any contract valued
at $500 or more with a governmental
body unless the contract has been
awarded through an open and public
process, including prior public notice
and subsequent public disclosure of
all proposals considered and contracts
awarded. Any contract made in violation
of this subsection shall be voidable by
a court of competent jurisdiction if the
suit is commenced within 90 days of
making of the contract."
In regard to these provisions of the Act the Commission
has rendered several decisions which are applicable and
pertinent to your question. Specifically, the Commission's
Opinion in Kilmer, 79 -037 indicates that any contract let
specifically to your husband valued at $500 or more with the
Township of Penn would have to be let in accordance with an
open and public bid process. However, since the contract in
question in your circumstance would not be with your husband
but rather with Neilan Engineers, the open and public bid
requirements of Section 3(c) would not be applicable.
However the provisions of Section 3(a) do apply and
would preclude you from using your public office to obtain
financial gain for either yourself or a member of your
immediate family. Thus, as your Counsel recognizes, it
would be imperative for you to abstain from voting on any
Mrs. Laura Painter
October 9, 1980
Page 3
aspect of hiring Neilan Engineers for work done in the
township to avoid the appearance of any posssible confict
under Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act. This requirement is
similar to that requirement imposed by the Commission in
Stewart, 79 -070. Basically, the Ethics Act does not prohi-
bit simultaneous employment by a governmental body or poli-
tical subdivision of an elected official and his or her
spouse so long as the requirements of Section 3(a) of the
Ethics Act are met. See Beck, 79 -018.
Conclusion: The hiring of your spouse by Neilan Engineers
does not constitute any conflict of interest, per se, with
your role as a public official in the Township of Penn.
Such employment of your husband by Neilan Engineers, where
that firm does contract work for the township, might give
rise to the appearance of a conflict and under Section 3(a)
of the Ethics Act you should refrain from voting on any
matter or aspect of hiring Neilan Engineers for work to be
done in the township.
Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete
defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the
Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other
civi or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has
disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed
the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given.
This letter is a public record and will be made avail-
able as such.
Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you
have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the
full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance
before the Commission may be scheduled and a formal Opinion
from the Commission will be issued. You should make such a
request or indicate your disapproval of this Advice within
the next 30 days.
SSC /rdp
cerely,
GLZ‘GL� (i f !
andra S. Chr st i on ��``�
General Coun el