Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-552 MikesicTO: DISCUSSION: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 March 3, 1980 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Nicholas J. Mikesic, Esquire 220 Central Park Building 132 Park Place Johnstown, PA 15906 Advice 1/ 552 RE: Spouse of a Public Official Serving as Auditor of Public Official's Accounts FACTS: On February 13, Nicholas J. Mikesic, Solicitor for the Lower Yoder Township Board of Supervisors wrote this Commission asking for an opinion as to two fact situations: (1) Husband is Township Supervisor and Secretary- Treasurer; Wife is Township Auditor. (2) Husband is Township Auditor; Wife is appointed Township Earned Income Tax and Per Capita Tax Collector. Mr. Mikesic advises he found no specific provisions in the Second Class Township Code, General Municipal or the Ethics Law. The issue is whether it is a conflict of interests for a spouse of a public official to serve as auditor of that public officials accounts. Section 3(d) of the State Ethics Act specifically provides that the State Ethics Commission may address "other areas of possible conflict." Section 1 of the State Ethics Act requires that "holders of or candidates for public office present neither a conflict nor the appearance of a conflict with the public trust." The position of auditor requires independence from the accounts being audit. Independence cannot be achieved where the auditor has a business interest in the accounts being audited or is a member of the immediate family of the individual who is responsible for making expenditures on the accounts. Nicholas J. Mikesic, Esquire March 3, 1980 Page 2 DRM /rdp -2 Therefore, it is the position of the State Ethics Commission that a spouse of a public official may not serve as auditor of that public official's accounts. Where the necessity to audit a spouse's accounts arises, and is not a regular part of the auditor's responsibility, the auditor may hire an independent accounting firm to perform the audit. Lucchino, 79 -75. It is presumed in this fact situation, however that a township auditor's position is a rather minimal one and would involve auditing the public official's- spouse's accounts as a regular part of the position. CONCLUSION: The spouse of a public official may not serve as auditor where the primary responsibility of that auditor is to audit• that public official's accounts. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. 7 :'/7 / 0 2114 7 DAVID RITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel