Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-534 SonnenscheinTO: FACTS: DISCUSSION: Marco S. Sonnenschein 915 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17102 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 February 22, 1980 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL RE: Section 3(e) and Time Calculation Advice # 534 On February 6, 1980, Marco S. Sonnenschein, former Deputy Secretary for Taxation for the Department of Revenue, wrote this Commission asking for a ruling as to whether he could appear before the Board of Finance and Revenue. He advised that on July 19, 1979 he left his position as Deputy Secretary for Taxation, but last served as designee for the Secretary of Revenue and the Board of Finance and Revenue in the last week of June, 1979. The Board of Finance and Revenue is composed of officials from five state agencies, one of which is the Department of Revenue. It rules on appeals on tax related matters affecting the Commonwealth. Mr. Sonnenschein is representing a client whose case is now on appeal to the Board of Finance and Revenue. It will be heard late June, 1980 exactly one year after he has last represented the Department of Revenue or the Board of Finance and Revenue. He has asked this Commission for permission to represent the client before the Board of Finance and Revenue the last week of June, 1980, rather than loose the client because of being required to wait until July 19, 1980, the one year anniversary from his leaving the position as Deputy Secretary for Taxation. The issue is whether section 3(e) may be construed so as to give different dates of commencing the one year bar rule depending on what particular function the official filled while serving as a public official or public employee. Marco S. Sonnenschein February 22, 1980 Page 2 DRM /rdp -2 In Berger /Beaser, 79 -60, the Commission held that a former member of the law department of the city of Philadelphia is barred for one year from representing anyone before the Zoning Board of Adjustment from the date which he left the Zoning Board of Adjustment, and not at the date he would have left the solicitors office. Therefore, since the representation on the Board of Finance and Revenue would cease the last week of June, 1980, Mr. Sonnenschein is not barred from representing a client before the Board of Finance and Revenue commencing the last week of June, 1980. CONCLUSION: A former Deputy Secretary for Taxation for the Department of Revenue may represent a client before the Board of Finance and Revenue within one year after he last represented the Department of Revenue on the Board of Finance and Revenue, even though he did not leave his position as Deputy Secretary for Taxation until 3 weeks after he last appeared on the Board of Finance and Revenue. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclsoed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. di DAVID RITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel