Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-531 RaudenbushTO: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION 308 FINANCE BUILDING HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17120 February 22, 1980 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Charles Raudenbush, Jr. Lower Southampton Township 1500 Desire Avenue Feasterville, PA 19047 RE: Limitations of a Former Township Solicitor FACTS: On February 8, 1980 Charles Raudenbush, Jr., Vice - Chairman of the Lower Southampton Township Board of Supervisors, wrote this Commission asking whether the former township solicitor can represent the Township Municipal Authority before the Board of Supervisors. He advised that the former township solicitor was being retained by the authority as special council for an equity action against the Board of Supervisors. DISCUSSION: Advice # 80 -531 The issue is whether section 3(e) bars a former township solicitor from representing an authority in litigation against his former clients, the Township Board of Supervisors. Section 3(e) states: No former official_or public employee shall represent a person, with or without compensation, on any matter before the governmental body with which he has been associated for one year after he leaves that body. This Commission has already decided that section 3(e) in no manner effects representation in a court of law. Berger/ Beaser, 79 -60, Kulier, 79 -80. Actions in equity are usually commenced in the Court of Common Pleas before a Chancellor. He is barred from representing any person before the township where no litigation is pending on a matter for a period of one year after he left the position of solicitor. Charles Raudenbush, Jr. Feburary 22, 1980 Page 2 CONCLUSION: DRM /rdp -2 A former township solicitor is not barred by Section 3(e) from representing any person in court against the governmental body with which he has been associated. A township solicitor is barred from representing any person before the township for a period of one year after he leaves that body. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclsoed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. /i 1 DAVID ITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel