Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-521 HobbsTO: FACTS: DISCUSSION: Davis R. Hobbs 112 Warren Street Tunkhannock, PA 18657 STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P. 0. Box 1179 Harrisburg, PA 17108 February 13, 1980 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL 80 -521 RE: County Solicitors and Client Disclosure Requirement On January 17, 1980, Davis R. Hobbs, Esquire, wrote this Commission asking whether county solicitors were public employees or public officials. He also asked whether the phrase "doing business within the jurisdiction of the governmental body" in the Lowery opinion should read "doing business with the jurisdicition of the governmental body." The issue is whether a county solicitor is a public employee or public official. The distinction between the two for practical purposes is the filing requirement. Public employees file only with the county commissioners, while public officials would file both with the county commissioners and the State Ethics Commission. The Commission recognizes the substantial difference in size between an eighth -class county and a first -class county. Solicitors for counties of third class through eighth class act only part -time, and in some cases, serve with only modest compensation. On the other hand, solicitors for Allegheny County and Philadelphia County play a major role at the policy level in their counties, and devote the majority of their time to the position of county solicitor. Therefore, county solicitors at the first- & second -class county level are public officials, and must file their Statements of Financial Interests with the State Ethics Commission as well as the county commissioners in Allegheny County, and the president of city council of the Philadelphia county. Solicitors of third - through eighth -class counties devote only a small fraction of their time to the position of county solicitor, and as such are public employees, and need only file with the county commissioners office. Davis R. Hobbs February 13, 1980 Page 2 CONCLUSION: DRM /rdp -2 Client disclosure of a solicitor is only required where the advice is for the purpose of dealing with the governmental body with which that solicitor is associated. Since it is a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility to represent both sides of any matter, disclosure would normally only occur when an attorney is accepting a new solicitorship and has advised clients with respect to matters with which that governmental body has dealt. County solicitors at the first- & second -class county level are public officials and must file Statements of Financial Interests with their governing authority and with the State Ethics Commission. County solicitors of third through eighth -class counties are public employees and only file their Statements of Financial Interests with their governing authority. Disclosure of clients identities and address of a solicitor is only required of those persons who have paid fees for services related to matters before the governmental body with which that attorney is or would be- associated. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. DAVID RITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel