Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-501 BrowningTO: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P. 0. Box 1179 Harrisburg, PA 17108 January 21, 1980 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Robert P. Browning Oliver, Price & Rhodes Attorneys At Law 1200 Scranton National Bank Scranton, PA 18503 RE: School Directors Disclosing Security FACTS: 80 -501 On October 5, 1979, Robert P. Browning, Council for a school district, requested an advisory opinion from the Commission. He advised that a member of the Board of School Directors buys and sells securities, but always registers them in the "street name." Mr. Browning inquired whether his client must disclose the name of each company in which he has owned securities during the preceding year, or is this limited to those securities held at the end of the year? DISCUSSION: The issue is what securities must be reported on the Statement of Financial Interest. First, we have adopted a de minimis standard as to question 9 in the Act which requires the public official to list "financial interest in any legal entity in business or profit." Therefore, a school director would list only those stocks of which he had 5% interest in the company in Question 9 of the Financial Interest Statement. Question number 5 requires the listing of sources of income. A School director must aggregate the total income from the shares of stock that he and his wife own, and if the dividend income plus capital gains equals or exceeds $500, that security must be listed in number 5. It need not be listed in number 9 unless the 5% de minimis requirement is met. Robert P. Browning January 21, 1980 Page 2 As to the income question, the test is one of total income, and not time of ownership. As to Financial Interest Statement Question 9, if at any time during the year the total holdings of the School Director in a given company equal or exceed 5% of the equity of that company, disclosure would be required. CONCLUSION: DRM /rdp -2 If the stock is a mutual fund, only the mutual fund need be listed if it meets the threshold requirements of questions 5 & 9. Listing the brokerage house alone would not meet the disclosure requirements. At the present time the State Ethics Commission has been enjoined by Justice Nix of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from requiring School Directors to file any Statements of Financial Interest with the State Ethics Commission, pending the outcome of the School Directors case. The name of any security must be listed in Question 5 if the dividend plus capital gain of that security, or mutual fund, equal or exceeds $500 or more. Question 9 only requires the listing of securities which the public official or public employee has a 5% interest. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or crimnal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request, if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. DAVID RITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel