Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-554 McDermottTO: RE: FACTS: DISCUSSION: CONCLUSION: STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P. 0, Box 1179 Harrisburg, PA 17108 ADVICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL November 20, 1979 Arthur T. McDermott, Esquire 127 S. College Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Advice Number 79 -554 Whether an attorney /state employee may represent members of his department on personal matters outside normal working manhours On September 28, 1979, Arthur T. McDermott wrote the Commission to ask whether or not he was in a conflict of interest with respect to representation of certain members of his department outside of normal working hours. He is a member of Pennsylvania Bar and of the District of Columbia Bar. He maintains a small general practice outside normal working hours. His practice does nct involve the Department of Health, of which he is employed. Mr. McDermott advised that he has accepted employment as a private attorney for the drafting of wills, custody hearings, an alleged default payment matter, divorce, and a change of name action. He asks whether such representation is limited or barred by Act 170. The issue here is whether Act 170 limits a Commonwealth employee /attorney from giving legal advice to members of his governmental body outside normal working hours. Act 170 does not specifically address this issue at all. Providing legal services to members of one's department is not using one's public office for financial gain. Section 3(a) does bar any public official or public employee from representing an individual before the agency of which he is a public official or public employee. This is not the case here. Act 170 does not bar Commonwealth employees /attorneys from representing members of their agency in nonagency related matters outside normal working hours. 79 554 Arthur T. McDermott November 20, 1979 page 2 Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the advice given. A personal appearance before the Commission and a formal opinion will be issued upon your request, if you feel this reply does not suffice. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. DAV D RITTENHOUSE MORRISON Chief Counsel