Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-513 DawsonGretchen S. Dawson RD #1 Dalton, PA 18414 RE: Township Supervisor, Surveyor Dear Ms. Dawson: MM6ng Address STATE ETHICS COMMISSION P.O. BOX 1 179 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 TELEPHONE: (717) 783 -1610 January 27, 1984 ADVICE OF COUNSEL 84 -513 This responds to your letter of January 5, 1984, in which you requested advice from the State Ethics Commission. Issue: You ask whether you may be employed as a Surveyor by an engineering firm who has done work for the Township where you are currently serving as a Supervisor. Facts: You indicate that you are a second -term Supervisor in North Abbington Township, hereinafter the Township. In May of 1982 you received an Associate Degree in Surveying Technology from Pennsylvania State University. You indicate that before you can take the examination to become a registered land surveyor in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania you are required to work under the supervision of a registered land surveyor or engineer for a four year period. Within the last two to three years when the Township has needed the services of an engineer you have called upon Frederick C. Spott and Associates of Scranton, Pennsylvania, hereinafter Spott, to perform such services for the Township as may have been required. In conjunction with the requirement that you work for a registered land surveyor and as a result of your training, you have recently received an offer from Spott to work on their surveying crew. Assuming that you will undertake this work, you indicate that you will not participate in any work which Spott might perform for the Township. You expect that because the Township is extremely small (population 625), there are no major projects anticipated which would require engineering services, but that if it would be necessary for the Township to employ the services of Spott in the near future, the Township would request bids before awarding a contract for this work. You indicate that your only interest in working for Spott is to gain experience as a surveyor and to, at some point, hopefully, he qualified to take the examination to become a registered land surveyor. Discussion: As an elected Supervisor in the Township, you are a "public official" as that term is defined in the State Ethics Act. See Section 2 of the Ethics Act, 65 P.S. 402. As such, your conduct must conform to the requirements of the State Ethics Act. State Ethics Commission • 308 Finance Building • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Gretchen S. Dawson January 27, 1984 Page 2 Under the circumstances that you outline above, the main consideration we would have would be that your conduct conform to the requirements of Section 3(a) of the Ethics Act which states as follows: (a) No public official or public employee shall use his public office or any confidential information received through his holding public office to obtain financial gain other than compensation provided b law for himself, a member of his immediate family, or a business with which he is associated. 65 P.S. 403(a). If you were to become employed by Spott, Spott would be considered a "business with which you are associated" as that term is defined in the State Ethics Act as follows: "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or holder of stock. 65 P.S. 402. As an employee of Spott and because they would be a "business with which you are associated ", you would be required to abstain as a public official, should any matters regarding Spott -- including the award of a contract or consideration of their bid to acquire sage -- come before the Township. This would include abstaining from discussions, recommendations, deliberations, as well as official votes regarding matters in which Spott might be interested. However, the Ethics Act would generally impose no requirements or prohibitions upon your proposed employment by Spott other than the abstention requirement which might arise as outlined above should Spott and the Township seek to contract or should Spott present proposals to the Township to secure such a contract. In making this statement, we assume, of course, that there is an adherence to the requirements of Section 3(b) of the Ethics Act which states as follows: (b) No person shall offer or give to a public official or public employee or candidate for public office or a member of his immediate family or a business with which he is associated, and no public official or public employee or candidate for public office shall solicit or accept, anything of value, including a gift, loan, political Gretchen S. Dawson January 27, 1984 Page 3 contribution, reward, or promise of future employment based on any understanding that the vote, official action, or judgment of the public official or public employee or candidate for public office would be influenced thereby. 65 P.S. 403(b). Under Section 3(b) you may not accept any thing of value, including the promise of or continuation of employment with Spott on the understanding that any official conduct would be influenced thereby. We include reference to this provision of the Ethics Act not to imply that there is any prohibition or restriction against your acceptance of employment with Spott but merely to provide a comprehensive analysis of the provisions of the Ethics Act which might be applicable. Conclusion: The Ethics Act does not prohibit or restrict your acceptance of employment as a surveyor with Spott even during your term as a Supervisor in the Township. Your conduct as a Supervisor, however, if you accept such employment with Spott, should be governed by the considerations expressed in this Advice. Pursuant to Section 7(9)(ii), this Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, providing the requestor has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may request that the full Commission review this Advice. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion from the Commission will be issued. Any such appeal must be made, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days of service of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code 2.12. SSC /rdp Sincerely, - Sandra S. ristianson General Counsel