Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-545 Lozano ADVICE OF COUNSEL July 22, 2016 Heidi Lozano 715 Jordan Avenue Montoursville, PA 17754 16-545 Dear Ms. Lozano: This responds to your letter dated May 17, 2016, styled as a Financial Interest Disclosure appeal, which will be treated as a request for an advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission (“Commission”). Issue: Whether, as a Highway Design Supervisor with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”) under job code 10330, you would be considered a “public employee” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (the “Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et seq., and particularly, the requirements for filing Statements of Financial Interests. Facts: You seek a determination as to whether, in your capacity as a Highway Design Supervisor with PennDOT under job code 10330, you are a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission. See, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102; 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. You specifically question whether you are required to file Statements of Financial Interests (“SFIs”). You have submitted a copy of your official Commonwealth position description, which document is incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, a copy of the job classification specifications for the position of Highway Design Supervisor, job code 10330, has been submitted and is incorporated herein by reference. Per your official Commonwealth position description, you function as a Roadway Design Squad Leader, and you supervise the work of highway designers, technicians, draftsman designers, draftsmen, and engineers in the design of highway projects. Your job duties and responsibilities include:  Ensuring that all Joint Permit and Individual NPDES Permit applications are administratively complete and submitted seven months before the scheduled letting date;  Controlling costs within programmed amounts on all projects;  Including specific training objectives on all directly assigned employees’ EPRs;  Training draftsmen, technicians, and lower level designers in highway design skills, plans presentation, and PennDOT policy and procedures; Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 2  Maintaining Open Plan or ASTA schedules as the lead project manager on projects;  Attending Scoping Field View (or sending a representative) as the lead project manager on projects and providing a Scoping Form with project information and proposed design criteria;  Holding a formal constructability review on all projects at the approximately 50% and 80% plan complete stage;  Monitoring project budgets and providing required changes for all projects as necessary to the District Plans Engineer;  Coordinating and monitoring design development and costs and working with other units to ensure that project development proceeds smoothly, all appropriate factors are included, and scheduled letting dates are met;  Preparing all submissions to the central office, including federal and state documentation, and obtaining project-related approvals;  Preparing contract special provisions;  Supervising the work of highway designers, technicians, draftsman designers, draftsmen, and engineers in the design of highway projects;  Planning, directing and exercising responsibility for all squad activities including performing basic highway design studies, preliminary designs on complete projects, and preparing complete final design, right-of-way, and construction plans for highway betterment, improvement, and new construction projects ranging from the simplest to the very complex;  Acting as project manager for assigned projects and ensuring that projects are developed on the established schedule and that ECMS is utilized during the design process;  Responding to inquiries and complaints and resolving highway design related problems that develop during construction;  Interpreting and verifying that designs conform to PennDOT policy, design guidelines, standards, specifications, and Federal Highway Administration requirements; and  Conducting and participating in field views as necessary to evaluate existing field conditions and terrain and their potential impacts and effects on the highway design project. Position Description, at 1-3. Per the job classification specifications under job code 10330, a Highway Design Supervisor performs professional supervisory work in designing highway projects, with specific examples of such work including the following:  Supervises the work of Highway Designers in designing less complex highway projects or phases of complex projects;  Supervises employees engaged in determining quantities, costs, and placement of materials on proposed projects;  Trains and supervises Highway Design Technicians and Highway Designers;  Supervises an engineering district’s project proposal and estimate preparation function to include special provisions and indicating specifications, quantities, and descriptive material as indicated in related specifications;  Reviews complete sets of design plans prepared by consultants for technical standards and adherence to applicable specifications;  Initiates corrective disciplinary action for minor misconduct by employees and recommends major corrective disciplinary actions or dismissals;  Interprets contractual and administrative rights and obligations for employees and modifies work environment or process to conform to changing conditions; Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 3  Receives grievances and complaints, conducts initial investigation into causes and conditions, discusses with employee, and resolves or recommends resolution of grievance or complaint;  Prepares employee performance evaluation reports; and  Approves leave, schedules personnel, and authorizes or assigns overtime. Job Classification Specifications, at 1-2. You assert that you are not responsible for taking or recommending official action of a non-ministerial nature that would bring you within the definition of “public employee” as set forth in the Ethics Act. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. The Ethics Act defines the term “public employee” as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Public employee." Any individual employed by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision who is responsible for taking or recommending official action of a nonministerial nature with regard to: (1) contracting or procurement; (2) administering or monitoring grants or subsidies; (3) planning or zoning; (4) inspecting, licensing, regulating or auditing any person; or (5) any other activity where the official action has an economic impact of greater than a de minimis nature on the interests of any person. The term shall not include individuals who are employed by this Commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof in teaching as distinguished from administrative duties. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. The Regulations of the State Ethics Commission similarly define the term “public employee” and set forth the following additional criteria: (ii) The following criteria will be used, in part, to determine whether an individual is within the definition of "public employe": (A) The individual normally performs his responsibility in the field without onsite supervision. Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 4 (B) The individual is the immediate supervisor of a person who normally performs his responsibility in the field without onsite supervision. (C) The individual is the supervisor of a highest level field office. (D) The individual has the authority to make final decisions. (E) The individual has the authority to forward or stop recommendations from being sent to the person or body with the authority to make final decisions. (F) The individual prepares or supervises the preparation of final recommendations. (G) The individual makes final technical recommen- dations. (H) The individual's recommendations or actions are an inherent and recurring part of his position. (I) The individual's recommendations or actions affect organizations other than his own organization. (iii) The term does not include individuals who are employed by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of the Commonwealth in teaching as distinguished from administrative duties. (iv) Persons in the following positions are generally considered public employes: (A) Executive and special directors or assistants reporting directly to the agency head or governing body. (B) Commonwealth bureau directors, division chiefs or heads of equivalent organization elements and other governmental body department heads. (C) Staff attorneys engaged in representing the department, agency or other governmental bodies. (D) Engineers, managers and secretary-treasurers acting as managers, police chiefs, chief clerks, chief purchasing agents, grant and contract managers, administrative officers, housing and building inspectors, investigators, auditors, sewer enforcement officers and zoning officers in all governmental bodies. (E) Court administrators, assistants for fiscal affairs and deputies for the minor judiciary. (F) School superintendents, assistant superintendents, school business managers and principals. Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 5 (G) Persons who report directly to heads of executive, legislative and independent agencies, boards and commissions except clerical personnel. (v) Persons in the following positions are generally not considered public employes: (A) City clerks, other clerical staff, road masters, secretaries, police officers, maintenance workers, construction workers, equipment operators and recreation directors. (B) Law clerks, court criers, court reporters, probation officers, security guards and writ servers. (C) School teachers and clerks of the schools. 51 Pa. Code § 11.1. The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Ministerial action." An action that a person performs in a prescribed manner in obedience to the mandate of legal authority, without regard to or the exercise of the person’s own judgment as to the desirability of the action being taken. "Nonministerial actions." An action in which the person exercises his own judgment as to the desirability of the action taken. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Status as a "public employee" subject to the Ethics Act is determined by an objective test. The objective test applies the Ethics Act’s definition of the term “public employee” and the related regulatory criteria to the powers and duties of the position itself. Typically, the powers and duties of the position are established by objective sources that define the position, such as the job description, job classification specifications, and organizational chart. The objective test considers what an individual has the authority to do in a given position based upon these objective sources, rather than the variable functions that the individual may actually perform in the position. See, Phillips v. State Ethics Commission, 470 A.2d 659 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984); Eiben, Opinion 04-002;Shienvold, Opinion 04-001; Shearer, Opinion 03-011. The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has specifically considered and approved this Commission’s objective test and has directed that coverage under the Ethics Act be construed broadly and that exclusions under the Ethics Act be construed narrowly. See, Quaglia v. State Ethics Commission, 986 A.2d 974 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010), amended by, 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 8 (Pa. Cmwlth. January 5, 2010), allocatur denied, 607 Pa. 708, 4 A.3d 1056 (2010); Phillips, supra. The first portion of the statutory definition of “public employee” includes individuals with authority to take or recommend official action of a nonministerial nature. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Likewise, the regulatory criteria for determining status as a public employee, as set forth in 51 Pa. Code § 11.1(“public employee”)(ii), include not only individuals with authority to make final decisions but also individuals with authority to forward or stop recommendations from being sent to final decision-makers; individuals who prepare or supervise the preparation of final recommendations; individuals who make final technical recommendations; and individuals whose recommendations are an Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 6 inherent and recurring part of their positions. See, e.g., Reese/Gilliland, Opinion 05- 005. In applying the objective test in the instant matter, the necessary conclusion is that, in your capacity as a Highway Design Supervisor with PennDOT under job code 10330, you are a "public employee" subject to the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the Commission, and in particular, the requirements for filing SFIs pursuant to the Ethics Act. Cf., Garwood, Advice 01-552; Glitz, Advice 99-584; Nash, Advice 98-632; Krause, Advice 98-572; Pryor, Advice 98-501; Berkheimer, Advice 97-568. It is clear that as a Highway Design Supervisor under job code 10330, you have the ability to take or recommend official action of a nonministerial nature with respect to subparagraph (5) within the definition of “public employee” as set forth in the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Specifically, the following duties and authority set forth in the official Position Description and the job classification specifications under job code 10330 would be sufficient to establish your status as a “public employee” subject to the Ethics Act:  Controlling costs within programmed amounts on all projects;  Acting as the project manager on projects;  Monitoring project budgets and providing required changes for all projects as necessary to the District Plans Engineer;  Coordinating and monitoring design development and costs;  Preparing contract special provisions;  Supervising the work of highway designers, technicians, draftsman designers, draftsmen, and engineers in the design of highway projects;  Planning, directing and exercising responsibility for all squad activities including performing basic highway design studies, preliminary designs on complete projects, and preparing complete final design, right-of-way, and construction plans for highway betterment, improvement, and new construction projects ranging from the simplest to the very complex;  Resolving highway design related problems that develop during construction;  Interpreting and verifying that designs conform to PennDOT policy, design guidelines, standards, specifications, and Federal Highway Administration requirements;  Supervising the work of Highway Designers in designing less complex highway projects or phases of complex projects;  Supervising employees engaged in determining quantities, costs, and placement of materials on proposed projects;  Supervising an engineering district’s project proposal and estimate preparation function;  Reviewing complete sets of design plans prepared by consultants for technical standards and adherence to applicable specifications;  Initiating corrective disciplinary action for minor misconduct by employees and recommending major corrective disciplinary actions or dismissals;  Interpreting contractual and administrative rights and obligations for employees;  Receiving grievances and complaints, conducting initial investigation into causes and conditions, and resolving or recommending resolution of grievance or complaint;  Preparing employee performance evaluation reports; and  Approving leave, scheduling personnel, and authorizing or assigning overtime. The foregoing duties/authority would also meet the criteria for determining your status as a public employee under the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, specifically at 51 Pa. Code § 11.1, “public employee,” subparagraphs (i) and (ii). Lozano, 16-545 July 22, 2016 Page 7 Therefore, you are advised that as a Highway Design Supervisor with PennDOT under job code 10330, you are a “public employee” subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act and the Regulations of the State Ethics Commission, and in particular, the requirements for filing SFIs pursuant to the Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a Highway Design Supervisor with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation under job code 10330, you are a “public employee” subject to the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., and the Regulations of the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission, 51 Pa. Code § 11.1 et seq., and in particular, the requirements for filing Statements of Financial Interests pursuant to the Ethics Act. Accordingly, you must file a Statement of Financial Interests each year in which you hold the aforesaid position and the year following termination of such service. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel