Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1641 Schwenk In Re: Matthew Schwenk, : File Docket: 13-008 Respondent : X-ref: Order No. 1641 : Date Decided: 6/16/14 : Date Mailed: 7/10/14 Before: John J. Bolger, Chair Nicholas A. Colafella, Vice Chair Raquel K. Bergen Mark R. Corrigan Roger Nick Kathryn Streeter Lewis Maria Feeley This is a final adjudication of the State Ethics Commission. Procedurally, the Investigative Division of the State Ethics Commission conducted an investigation regarding possible violation(s) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., by the above-named Respondent. At the commencement of its investigation, the Investigative Division served upon Respondent written notice of the specific allegations. Upon completion of its investigation, the Investigative Division issued and served upon Respondent a Findings Report identified as an “Investigative Complaint.” A Stipulation of Findings and a Consent Agreement were subsequently submitted by the parties to the Commission for consideration. The Stipulated Findings are set forth as the Findings in this Order. The Consent Agreement has been approved. I. ALLEGATIONS: That Matthew Schwenk, a public official/public employee in his capacity as Director of Product Selection for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) violated Sections 1103(a) and 1105(b) of the State Ethics Act (Act 93 of 1998), 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a) and 1105(b), when he used the authority of his public position for \[the\] private pecuniary benefit of himself by soliciting and/or accepting items of value from vendors of the PLCB at a time when he was responsible for, and participated in, PLCB decisions to place vendor products in PLCB liquor stores; when he solicited and/or accepted travel/hospitality/lodging from Commonwealth vendors; and when he failed to disclose on Statements of Financial Interests his receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging and hospitality for calendar years 2010 through 2012. II.FINDINGS: 1. Matthew Schwenk served as the Director of Product Selection for the PLCB from approximately July 2010 until January 2013. a. Schwenk began employment with the PLCB in 2004, as a full-time clerk typist. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 2 1. Schwenk began employment with the Commonwealth with the Department of Labor & Industry as a temporary clerical pool employee. b. Schwenk held multiple positions during his tenure with the PLCB including Clerk, Management Analyst, Merchandising and Pricing Coordinator, and Chief of Category Management. 1. Schwenk received multiple promotions throughout his tenure with the PLCB. 2. Schwenk’s job description for the position of Director of Product Selection for the PLCB included the following responsibilities and duties: a. Planning, developing, directing, and coordinating the PLCB’s comprehensive statewide marketing and merchandising programs/functions; 1. In this capacity, Schwenk reported directly to James Short, PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising. b. Development, implementation, and evaluation of policies and operational procedures to ensure the efficient marketing of regularly listed and luxury wine and spirits products made available in Wine and Spirits stores; c. Direction of a centralized marketing and merchandising program to satisfy customer and licensee demand, promote product selection while enhancing profit, and ensure competitive pricing; d. Advising on proposed polic\[y\] changes needed for improved customer service and agency profitability; and e. Performance of work with considerable independence within the framework of applicable laws, regulations, and policies with considerable direction exercised in making administrative and program decisions under the general direction of an executive supervisor with work reviewed through conferences, reports, and evaluation of results obtained. f. Direction of the supervision of the luxury and category management staff in the establishment of marketing programs; g. Oversight of special pricing and display programs and coordinates with luxury and category management staff in the implementation of marketing and merchandising plans; h. Direction and approval of the development of standards for promotional campaign displays and oversight of the preparation of documentation for distribution to, and training of, field personnel; i. Direction of the planning and implementation of space prioritization and layout of varied products and brands for display and promotion; j. Direction and evaluation of profitability and margin analysis with appropriate recommendations; k. Presents analysis of supplier proposals to add products and makes recommendations to the Director of Marketing for prospective new product introduction or trial, or recommendations for discontinuation of currently Schwenk, 13-008 Page 3 offered products; l. Leads negotiations with vendors on product promotion proposals involving discounts, rebates, incentives, luxury items, or one-time buys; and m. Directs luxury wine and category management staff in the review and analysis of special product promotions, including the pricing, floor positioning, advertising, and marketing of these items. 3. The PLCB was created by state law on November 29, 1933, following the end of prohibition. a. Prohibition was repealed on December 5, 1933, with the ratification of the st 21 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. b. Pennsylvania is one of eighteen (18) states and two (2) Maryland counties that actively participate in the distribution process to control the sale of alcohol. 4. The PLCB is governed by a three (3) Member Board, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by two-thirds of the State Senate. a. The Board appoints a Chief Executive Officer. 5. The PLCB is responsible for regulating the sale of alcohol, educating consumers on the responsible use of alcohol, and working to prevent underage use of alcoholic beverages. 6. The PLCB accomplishes its responsibilities through marketing and merchandising a retail operation of approximately 608 stores with sales of approximately $2.1 billion in 2011-2012. 7. On April 12, 1951, the Pennsylvania General Assembly combined existing beer and liquor laws into one statute, entitled the “Liquor Code.” 8. On July 1, 1987, the Pennsylvania General Assembly reenacted the Liquor Code and created the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (“BLCE”), within the Pennsylvania State Police, which is responsible for enforcing the Liquor Code and the Board’s regulations; and the Office of Administrative Law Judge, an autonomous office within the PLCB, which is responsible for presiding over citation and enforcement hearings. 9. The PLCB provides products and services through seven (7) dedicated departments designed to meet the specific needs of PLCB customers and licensees. a. Each of the seven (7) dedicated offices has specific deputies who have oversight responsibility. b. Dedicated offices are: Finance, Supply Chain, Marketing & Merchandising, Retail Operations, Administration, Regulator Affairs, and External Affairs. 10. The PLCB is a high volume purchaser of wine and spirits in the United States. a. The PLCB currently operates approximately 608 stores, which are leased from private landlords. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 4 b. The PLCB outsources warehousing services for three (3) distribution centers in Pennsylvania. c. There currently are approximately 25,595 beverage alcohol licenses and permits throughout Pennsylvania and 5,391 registered malt and brewed beverage brands granted by the PLCB. 11. Products that are sold by the PLCB are categorized as either regular items, luxury items, or special order items. a. Regular items are products that are routinely stocked in the distribution centers. b. Luxury items are products that are purchased intermittently or as one-time purchases. c. Special order products are items that are not stocked in the PLCB distribution centers but may be special ordered by either licensees or by consumers. d. On or about February 4, 2004, the PLCB began the Chairman’s Selection Program, which offers wine at premium collection stores. 12. In or about 2006, a policy was developed by the PLCB known as the “bright line.” a. The policy was developed during the time when Joseph Martz was serving as PLCB Director of Administration. 1. In 2006, Martz simultaneously served as Secretary of the Commonwealth and PLCB Director of Administration. b. The bright line was a policy that advised employees they were to accept nothing from PLCB vendors. c. When initially implemented, the policy was applicable to employees of the Administrative Division of the PLCB. 1. Employees signed the policy agreeing not to accept anything from PLCB vendors. d. Jonathan Newman was PLCB Chairman at the time the policy was implemented for administrative staff. 13. In 2006, the Director of Administration had no supervisory authority over employees in the Purchasing Division. a. Requests were made to James Short, PLCB Director of Marketing, to implement the policy in the Purchasing Department. b. Short never implemented the policy. 14. As a Control State, the PLCB is the only retail seller of wine/spirits in the Commonwealth. a. The PLCB may grant licenses to entities/establishments for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption as well as for vendors who sell products for off-site consumption. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 5 b. In order for an alcoholic beverage to be sold in Pennsylvania, it must be authorized for sale by the PLCB. 1. If a product is “listed” it is authorized for sale and stocked as a product in PLCB retail stores. 15. In order to have a product sold by the PLCB, a manufacturer/supplier of alcoholic beverage products may employ several different methods to have its product represented within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. a. A manufacturer/supplier may market its product directly to the PLCB for the listing/delisting process as well as for sales and distribution. b. A manufacturer/supplier may market its product through a vendor. 1. For all sales/distribution, a vendor of record must be identified with the PLCB. 2. A manufacturer/supplier may also be a vendor/vendor of record. c. A manufacturer/supplier may enlist the services of a broker, who then in turn represents the manufacturer/supplier and its products before the PLCB. 1. Any broker may represent multiple manufacturers/suppliers and/or multiple products before the PLCB. 2. A broker may also serve as a vendor/vendor of record. 16. The PLCB periodically reviews all products currently sold in PLCB retail stores to evaluate their profitability, and at/or about the same time considers new products for placement in PLCB retail stores through a process known as “listing” and “delisting.” a. Listing/delisting occurs twice a year, usually in the fall and spring of each year. b. The goal of listing/delisting is to achieve a 1:1 ratio, when for each product listed, one product is delisted, due to the limited amount of shelf space available at each PLCB retail store. 17. The process to present a new product for listing is regulated through the PLCB. a. Once the appropriate application has been submitted, a specific date/time will be scheduled for a vendor/broker to present new products to Members of the PLCB. b. Generally two (2) bottles of a product are provided for sampling. 1. One (1) bottle for tasting and another for label review are submitted. c. PLCB \[staff\] members usually responsible for evaluating new product are:  Director of Marketing and Merchandising  Chief Product Management and Pricing Division  Merchandising Pricing Coordinator(s) Schwenk, 13-008 Page 6 d. Once a new product presentation has been made, a recommendation will be made as to whether the new product should be listed (sold in PLCB retail stores). 1. A report of products to be listed is forwarded to the Commissioners for approval. 2. The Commissioners do not participate in the new product review process. 3. Commissioners vote on the entire recommended new product list, without any independent review of the product/support data. 4. The Director of Marketing and Merchandising along with the Chief of the Product Management and Pricing Division make the final recommendation to the Commission as to what product(s) should be listed for sale. 5. Luxury wines and one-time buys, including the Chairman’s Selection Program, are not subject to the listing/delisting process. 18. Delisting occurs simultaneously with the listing process. a. The delisting process is formally termed “category management,” but is commonly described as “bucketing” or “filtration” process. b. If a product is to be delisted, the vendor is notified and provided an opportunity to avoid a delisting. 1. Actions such as an advertising campaign, discounts, and product sampling are used to promote sales and possibly avoid a delisting. c. Recommendations for delisting are similar to listings, where the Director of Marketing and Merchandising along with the Chief of the Product Management and Pricing Division make the final recommendation to the Commission as to what product(s) should be delisted. 19. The PLCB relies primarily on recommendations made by James Short, the Director of Marketing and Merchandising, and his subordinates, including Schwenk as the Director of Product Selection, when making listing/delisting decisions. a. The Board conducts no independent review of products and relies on staff recommendations. b. It is estimated that 5% of the recommendations to list/delist are not accepted by the Board. 20. The primary vendors providing products to the PLCB are:  Southern Wine and Spirits  Capital Wine and Spirits (Alliance Brands, White Rock Distilleries)  Allied Beverage (Majestic)  These vendors represent at least 31% of total PLCB sales/inventory. 21. Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc. (“Southern”) \[claims\] to be the nation’s largest wine and spirits distributor. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 7 a. Since its creation/formation in 1968, Southern has maintained its corporate office in Miami, Florida. b. Currently, Southern represents clients in no less than thirty-five (35) states including “Control States” and “Open States.” 1. An “Open State” refers to a state/jurisdiction where wine, spirits, and beer sales are conducted through an independent beverage distributor/retailer. 2. A “Control State” is where a state or county “controls” or regulates the distribution and/or the sale of wine, spirits, and/or beer. 3. Pennsylvania is the largest Control State operation in the United States. 22. Southern Wine & Spirits of Pennsylvania operates as a licensed wine and spirits broker/marketer. a. Southern expanded its operations into Pennsylvania in 1995. b. Southern employs approximately two-hundred twenty-five (225) sales and support staff statewide in Pennsylvania. c. Southern maintains two (2) offices within Pennsylvania, one in the King of Prussia area, and the other in the Greater Pittsburgh geographic area. 1. These employees are responsible for marketing and merchandising alcoholic beverages to the more than six-hundred (600) PLCB state stores, as well as Pennsylvania’s 14,500 on-premise accounts. 2. The PLCB is Southern’s only off-premise customer. 23. Brad M. Waxman (“Waxman”) is the Executive Vice President, General Manager of Southern Wine & Spirits of Pennsylvania. a. In January 1999, Waxman initiated his employment with Southern. 1. In 2002, Waxman was named Executive Vice President/General Sales Manager of Southern’s Pennsylvania operations. b. Mark Sweeney (“Sweeney”) is the Vice President and General Manager of North American Wine and Spirits, a division of Southern Wine and Spirits. 1. Sweeney also makes sales calls to PLCB officials and employees. 2. In 2008, Waxman was promoted to the position of Executive Vice President/General Manager of Southern’s Pennsylvania operations. 24. Southern is a broker and vendor/vendor of record for a number of wines and/or spirits sold to the PLCB. a. Waxman serves as a broker for a number of the products before the PLCB. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 8 b. Products for which Southern serves as broker and/or vendor/vendor of record account for between approximately 6.43% to 6.85% of PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years (2007-2012). 1. Sales to PLCB for years 2007 through 2012 totaled between $62,051,980.00 and $77,641,059.78. 25. Capital Wine & Spirits, LLC (“Capital”) claims to be one of the largest wholesalers/brokers of wine and spirits in Pennsylvania. a. Capital is a member of the Charmer Sunbelt Group, a nationwide distributor of wine, spirits, beer, and other beverages. b. The Charmer Sunbelt Group is a collection of privately held companies and operates distributor/brokerage houses in no less than fifteen (15) states, including Pennsylvania. c. Capital employs more than two-hundred (200) employees and reports to sell in excess of four million cases of wine and spirits throughout the Commonwealth. d. The reported four million cases of wine/spirit sales include sales to the PLCB. 26. Capital is a broker and vendor/vendor of record for a number of wines and/or spirits sold to the PLCB. a. Products brokered by Capital account for a total of between approximately 19.11% to 22.03% of PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years. b. Sales to the PLCB for years 2007 through 2012 totaled between $198,712,993.38 and $221,606,618.99. 27. In an effort to condense marketing efforts and maximize sales and product exposure, several manufacturers/producers of wines, spirits and malt/brewed beverages have formed partnerships for marketing purposes; one such partnership is “The Alliance.” a. The Alliance is comprised of wine/spirit suppliers: Bacardi USA (“Bacardi”); Brown-Forman; and Remy Cointreau (“Remy”). b. The Alliance was established by Bacardi, Brown-Forman, and Remy to “re- shape” their route to market in order to provide greater service and access to the consumer. c. The goal of The Alliance was/is to create a way for Bacardi, Brown-Forman, and Remy to leverage their scale and profitability in order to secure dedicated resources. 28. The Alliance is a United States program and is focused on distribution and a combined portfolio in an effort to compete with other suppliers. a. The Alliance covers twenty-six (26) markets, which include the state of Pennsylvania. b. Within Pennsylvania, The Alliance is represented by Capital Wine & Spirits/Charmer Sunbelt Group. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 9 29. Capital Wine and Spirits/Alliance Brands representatives interacting most often with PLCB officials include the following:  Mark Littles, President, Capital Wine and Spirits  Christina Desmond, Director of Marketing and Business Analytics  Rob Sirota, General Manager, Alliance Division of Capital Wine and Spirits  Kevin McCarty, Vice-President of Compliance and Administration of Capital Wine and Spirits  Tim Kilcullen, Vice-President of Wine and Education, Capital Wine and Spirits  David Franke (Brown-Forman) 30. Allied Beverage Group, LLC (“Allied”) was created by the mergers of The Baxter Group, Inc., F&A Distributing Company and The Jaydor Corporation. a. Allied reports to be New Jersey’s largest and most comprehensive wine and spirits distributor and ranks among the ten largest distributors in the United States. b. Allied also operates subsidiary Majestic Wine & Spirits, USA, LLC (“Majestic”), which is a Pennsylvania brokerage and vendor/vendor of record for products sold to the PLCB. 1. As a broker/vendor, Majestic provides merchandising and promotional services for several major suppliers of alcoholic beverages. 2. Majestic reports to be the PLCB’s highest volume distributor of “special liquor orders.” 31. As a broker and vendor/vendor of record for products sold to the PLCB, Allied and/or Majestic’s sales account for between approximately 1.51% to 2.18% of PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years. a. Sales to PLCB for years 2007 through 2012 totaled between $15,267,768.10 and $25,000,032.79. 32. Majestic’ s primary contacts with PLCB officials and employees are Chris Papariello and Edward Murray. a. Papariello is Executive Vice-President of Majestic. b. Murray serves as Majestic’s Eastern Regional Manager. 33. Executives and marketing representatives from vendors supplying products to the PLCB met with PLCB employees to market products. a. The market strategies of these representatives included offering gifts, transportation, lodging, and hospitality to PLCB employees. b. These items including golf events, meals, alcoholic beverages, and gift cards were offered year round including when listing/delisting of products was occurring. c. Items of value were routinely provided to PLCB officials who were in decision making positions regarding product selection and placement. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 10 34. Representatives of the numerous PLCB vendors frequently contacted Schwenk and various other PLCB representatives to market new and existing products. a. Some of these products were subject to the listing/delisting process. b. Other products were luxury products which are not subject to listing/delisting procedures. c. Schwenk’s job duties, at times, included making determinations where products would be located in state liquor stores. THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATE TO SCHWENK’S RECEIPT OF GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN A POSITION TO RECEIVE ABSENT HIS EMPLOYMENT WITH THE PLCB. 35. Robert Sirota is employed as the General Manager, Alliance Division, for Capital Wine and Spirits. a. In his position, Sirota serves as the direct liaison between the Alliance suppliers and Capital Wine and Spirits. b. Sirota reports directly to Mark Littles, President, Capital Wine and Spirits. 36. In or about 2009, the concept for an Alliance Golf Open was conceived as a collaborative effort between Sirota and members of the Alliance. a. The golf outing was organized as a means by which Capital Wine and Spirits and the Alliance suppliers could strengthen their relationship with the PLCB and to allow various Alliance senior management officials to have “face time” with PLCB officials. 37. Sirota served as the Capital Wine and Spirits lead/point of contact in relation to organization of the event. a. Although Sirota served as the event lead, PLCB individuals to be invited to the event were determined as a result of collaboration between Sirota, Littles, Christine Desmond (Director of Marketing and Business Analytics, Capital Wine and Spirits), and/or the Alliance suppliers. b. Actual invitations to PLCB officials for the event were made by Littles and/or Desmond. 38. Alliance Golf Open events were held in 2009, 2010, and 2011. a. Sirota served as the Capital Wine and Spirits lead for the event organization each year. b. Invitees to the event were determined in the same manner for each year. c. Actual invitations for the events were presented by the same individuals for each year. 39. An Alliance Golf Open was initially planned for the 2012 calendar year but ultimately was not held. a. The 2012 Alliance Golf Open was cancelled as a result of the Commission investigation in this matter and published media accounts of the receipt of Schwenk, 13-008 Page 11 items of value by PLCB employees from PLCB vendors. b. The decision to cancel the event was made jointly among Littles, Desmond, and Sirota. 40. The 2009, 2010, and 2011 Alliance Opens were one-day events consisting of morning travel (if necessary), a warm up session, lunch, a round of golf (eighteen holes), and dinner in the evening. a. Sirota developed the itinerary for each respective Alliance Open. b. No specific time slot was designated for any specific business presentation by Capital Wine and Spirits and/or the Alliance suppliers. c. No specific business presentations were made by Capital Wine and Spirits and/or the Alliance suppliers at the events. d. The event was primarily social in nature with no specific business agenda. 41. The costs associated with the 2009, 2010, and 2011 Alliance Golf Open were borne by the Alliance suppliers and Capital Wine and Spirits. a. The total costs of the events were divided into four equal amounts to be paid by Capital Wine and Spirits, Bacardi, Brown-Forman, and Remy. 42. The 2009 Alliance Golf Open was held at the West Shore County Club, 100 Brentwater Road, Camp Hill, PA 17011, on Wednesday, August 19, 2009. a. In addition to Schwenk, PLCB attendees were Short and CEO Joe Conti. b. Schwenk reported directly to James Short. 1. Short is a subordinate to PLCB CEO Joe Conti. c. Although the event was social in nature, Schwenk did not utilize leave of any kind (annual or personal) in association with his participation at the 2009 Alliance Open. 1. Schwenk attended this event at the direction of his Supervisor, James Short. 2. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” as he was advised to attend by Short and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. d. All expenses associated with the event, including cocktails and dinner after the event, were paid for by Capital Wine and Spirits and/or members of the Alliance. 43. Sirota received a banquet invoice from the West Shore Country Club for the August 19, 2009, Alliance Golf Open in the amount of $1,324.06. a. The invoice did not document a date or invoice number. b. The invoice documented the client/organization as Capital Wine and Spirits. c. The invoice documented a breakdown of golf charges in the amount of Schwenk, 13-008 Page 12 $1,136.80 and food and beverage charges in the amount of $187.26 ($1,324.06 total). d. The cost of the event to Capital Wine and Spirits and each Alliance supplier was approximately $331.00 ($1,324.00 ÷ 4). 44. Additional purchases totaling approximately $147.17 were made by Sirota and Desmond for refreshments in association with the 2009 Alliance Open. a. Sirota’s expense report documented a purchase in the amount of $67.17 for the golf outing. b. Desmond’s expense report documented a purchase of $80.00 for the golf outing. 45. Expenses associated with the 2009 Alliance Golf Open totaled at least $1,471.23. a. The value of the golf outing based on a maximum of sixteen individuals in attendance totaled approximately $105.09 per individual. 1. Greens fees costs for the two (2) WSCC members are not included as they were not assessed fees. 46. The 2010 Alliance Golf Open was held at the River Crest Golf Club, 100 Golf Club Drive, Phoenixville, PA 19460 on July 15, 2010. a. The event was more inclusive than the 2009 event by providing lunch, cocktails and dinner. 1. Fifteen (15) individuals participated in the 2010 Alliance Open, including three (3) PLCB officials/employees. b. PLCB attendees at the event included Schwenk, Short, and P.J. Stapleton (PLCB Chairman at that time.) 1 Neither Schwenk nor Short utilized leave of any kind (annual or personal) in association with their respective attendance at the 2010 Alliance Open. 2. Schwenk was directed to attend this event by his Supervisor, James Short. 3. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” as he was directed to attend by Short, and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. 4. All expenses associated with the event, including cocktails and dinner after the event, were paid for by Capital Wine and Spirits and/or members of the Alliance. 47. Schwenk submitted Commonwealth Travel Expense Voucher (TEV) MS07152010 dated July 26, 2010, in the amount of $195.24 for travel and overnight expenses from Harrisburg to Skippack, Pennsylvania, and New Hope, Pennsylvania, on July 15, 2010, and from Skippack, Pennsylvania, to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on July 16, 2010. a. Schwenk submitted the TEV at the direction of Short. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 13 48. Records of Capital Wine and Spirits in reference to the July 15, 2010, Alliance Golf Open documented expenses incurred in the approximate amount of $7,363.00. a. The document memorializing the cost of the event was updated on July 16, 2010. b. The invoice documented the expense breakdown as: Description Costs Food & Beverage $4,263.00 Golf $1,280.00 Golf Swag Bags $1,600.00 Forecaddies $220.00 Total $7,363.00 c. The cost of the event to Capital Wine and Spirits and each Alliance supplier was approximately $1,840.75 ($7,363.00 ÷ 4). 49. The value of the golf outing based on a maximum of fifteen (15) individuals in attendance totaled approximately $490.87 per individual. 50. The 2011 Alliance Golf Open was held at the Philadelphia Country Club, 1601 Spring Mill Road, Gladwyne, PA 19035 on July 14, 2011. a. PLCB attendees at the event included Schwenk, Short, Conti, Stapleton, and Doug Hitz, PLCB Bureau Director for Planning and Procurement. b. Although the event was social in nature, neither Schwenk nor any other PLCB employees utilized leave of any kind (annual or personal) in association with their respective attendance at the 2011 Alliance Open. c. Schwenk was authorized to attend this event by his Supervisor, James Short. d. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. e. All expenses associated with the event, including cocktails and dinner after the event as well as golf shirts, hats, and gift bags, were paid for by Capital Wine and Spirits and/or members of the Alliance. 51. Schwenk submitted Commonwealth Travel Expense Voucher (TEV) MS071511 dated July 20, 2011, in the amount of $130.20 for travel and overnight expenses to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on July 14, 2011, returning to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on July 15, 2011. a. TEV No. MS071511 was submitted and completed as directed by Short on July 20, 2011. 52. Capital Wine and Spirits records in reference to the July 14, 2011, Alliance Golf Open documented expenses incurred at the Philadelphia Country Club in the approximate amount of $9,487.96. a. The banquet invoice generated by the Philadelphia Country Club (Booking No. 017299) documented a billing date of July 14, 2011. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 14 b. The invoice documented the expense breakdown as: Recap & Total Costs Services $2,691.55 Resources $6,037.00 Service Chg $592.14 Sales Tax $167.27 Total $9,487.96 1. Included within the event cost were golf hats, shirts, and golf gift bags with miscellaneous items for the participants. c. The cost of the event to Capital Wine and Spirits and each Alliance supplier was approximately $2,371.99 ($9,487.96 ÷ 4). d. The value of the golf outing based on a maximum of twenty (20) individuals in attendance totaled approximately $474.40 per individual. THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATE TO SCHWENK’S RECEIPT OF GOLF TRIPS THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN A POSITION TO RECEIVE ABSENT HIS EMPLOYMENT WITH THE PLCB. 53. Christopher Papariello is currently employed as the Executive Vice-President of Majestic Wine and Spirits (“Majestic”). a. Majestic is owned by Allied Beverage Group. b. Majestic provides merchandising and promotional services as the broker representative of several major suppliers including W.J. Deutsch and Sons (“W.J. Deutsch”). 1. W.J. Deutsch was founded in 1981 to market wine and spirits produced from major wine and spirits regions of the world. 54. Beau Clark is employed with W. J. Deutsch as a Pennsylvania District Manager. a. As the Pennsylvania District Manager for W. J. Deutsch, Clark was responsible for development of the Pennsylvania market for both on and off premise sales. 55. In or about August 2010 Clark and Papariello organized a golf trip to Pebble Beach, California. a. Clark and Pappariello discussed PLCB employee James Short accompanying them on the golf trip. b. W.J. Deutsch was to cover the expenses associated with the trip. c. Short received his invitation for the trip directly from Papariello. d. Schwenk was informed by Short that he was to attend. 56. At no time did Papariello provide any information as to the cost of the trip or whether any payment was required regarding expenses associated with the trip. a. Both Schwenk and Short were informed that W.J. Deutsch had budgeted funds to cover the costs associated with the trip. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 15 b. Costs associated with the trip included airfare, lodging, greens fees, subsistence, and entertainment. 57. The dates established for the golf trip to Pebble Beach called for Schwenk and Short to arrive in California on August 26, 2010, and depart California on August 28, 2010. a. August 26, 2010, (a Thursday) and August 27, 2010, (a Friday) were regularly scheduled work days for Commonwealth employees. b. Schwenk utilized a total of fifteen (15) hours of annual leave to account for his absence from work on August 26, 2010 and August 27, 2010. 58. Lodging accommodations as well as golf reservations for the trip were made by Clark. a. Schwenk, Short, Papariello, and Clark stayed at The Lodge at Pebble Beach located at 1700 17-Mile Drive, Pebble Beach, California, on the nights of August 26, 2010, and August 27, 2010. b. Schwenk, Short, Papariello, and Clark played two (2) rounds of golf at Pebble Beach Golf Links and one round of golf at Spy Glass Golf Course during the three day trip. c. The trip was submitted as a business expense by Clark and Papariello and was considered a marketing event. 59. Neither Schwenk nor Short made any payment to either Papariello or Clark for expenses associated with the three day golf trip to Pebble Beach, California, either prior to, during, or after the trip. a. The initial minimum cost for the trip of at least $6,497.46 posted to and was paid via Papariello’s corporate American Express Credit Card. 1. Expenses incurred by Majestic representatives via use of corporate credit cards are paid directly by the company. b. Approximately $6,000.00 of the minimum $6,497.46 expense for the golf trip was ultimately expensed back to W.J. Deutsch by Majestic. 1. W.J. Deutsch ultimately provided Document Number 76845 dated August 31, 2011, to Majestic documenting the issuance of a credit to Majestic in the amount of $6,000.00 for expenses associated with the trip. 60. Expenses for the golf trip totaling a minimum of approximately $6,497.46 posted to Papariello’s corporate American Express Credit Card on August 28, 2010, and August 29, 2010, regarding all accommodations/activities organized through The Lodge at Pebble Beach. a. The value of the trip per individual was approximately $1,624.37 not including airfare ($6,497.46 ÷ 4). 62. Current airfare for one round-trip ticket from Philadelphia International Airport to San Jose International Airport with one stop is approximately $347.50. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 16 a. Neither Papariello nor his employer provided records of airfare expenses incurred for Schwenk. 63. Both Short and Schwenk accepted the travel, lodging, and hospitality associated with the golf trip to Pebble Beach, California, from entities conducting business with the PLCB at the time of the trip. 64. Schwenk realized a private pecuniary gain of no less than $1,971.87 in association with his acceptance of an all-expense paid three (3) day golf trip to Pebble Beach provided by Majestic Wine and Spirits/W. J. Deutsch and Sons at a time when Majestic Wine and Spirits and W. J. Deutsch and Sons had ongoing business dealings with the PLCB. a. All expenses associated with the event including airfare, lodging, greens fees, subsistence, and entertainment, were paid for by Majestic Wine and Spirits and/or W.J. Deutsch. THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATE TO GOLF OUTINGS FOR SCHWENK ARRANGED BY WHITE ROCK DISTILLERIES REPRESENTATIVES. 65. Tricia Brungo and Paul Doran are currently employed by Western Spirits Beverage Company (“Western Spirits”) in the positions of Controlled States Manager and Regional Sales Manager respectively. a. Capital Wine and Spirits serves as the distributor/vendor for Western Spirits in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 66. Prior to their employment with Western Spirits, Brungo and Doran were employed by White Rock Distilleries (“White Rock”) in the positions of Control State Manager and Regional Sales Manager respectively. a. Capital Wine and Spirits served as the distributor/vendor for White Rock in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. b. In 2010, White Rock was marketing products to the PLCB including Three Olives vodka. 1. Brungo and Doran marketed products to PLCB officials including Schwenk. 67. White Rock is not currently operational. a. White Rock sold the rights to all of its brands and ceased operations as of June 1, 2012. b. Paul Coulombe was/served as the owner/Chief Executive Officer of White Rock prior to its closing. 68. During or about February 2010, Coulombe invited James Short, Brungo and Doran (White Rock representatives), and Desmond (Capital Wine and Spirits representative) to his residence near Naples, Florida, for a weekend golf outing to occur at Bonita Bay East. a. No marketing or business purpose existed for the trip. 1. All expenses incurred by Brungo and other White Rock officials were reimbursed by White Rock. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 17 b. The purpose of the trip was not related to any official PLCB purpose. c. Short directed Schwenk to accompany him on the trip. d. Lodging for Schwenk and Short was provided by Coulombe at his personal residence near Naples, Florida. 69. The dates established for the golf trip to Bonita Bay called for Schwenk, Short, and the remaining invitees to arrive in Florida on Thursday, February 11, 2010, and depart on Saturday, February 13, 2010. a. Thursday, February 11, 2010, and Friday, February 12, 2010, were regularly scheduled work days for Commonwealth employees. 70. Schwenk and Short traveled to Florida on February 11, 2010, and played at least one round of golf (eighteen holes) with Coulombe, Brungo, Doran, and Desmond at Bonita Bay during the three (3) day trip. a. No specific business meetings were held during the three day time frame. 71. All of Schwenk’s and Short’s expenses associated with the trip (i.e. airfare, greens fees, meals, entertainment, etc.) were paid for by Coulombe and/or White Rock representatives. 72. Total expenses for the golf trip sponsored by Coulombe/White Rock could not be specifically determined due to the lack of records provided by White Rock regarding airfares, meals, greens fees and entertainment paid for on behalf of Schwenk and Short. a. No specific records could be located detailing the costs associated with the trip with the exception of two entries on Brungo’s expense summary report for February 13, 2010. 1. Brungo’s expense report for February 13, 2010, documented cocktails purchased at Trulucks and Verginas for $84.26 and $88.30 respectively for entertainment regarding Schwenk and Short. 73. Current airfare for one round-trip ticket from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport (a/k/a Fort Meyers Airport) with one stop is approximately $330.20. a. Air travel was arranged by Coulombe. 74. Schwenk did not utilize Commonwealth leave of any type (annual or personal) to account for the fifteen (15) hour absence from his normal working hours on February 11, 2010, and February 12, 2010. a. Schwenk was informed by Short not to utilize leave. b. Schwenk went on the trip at the direction of his immediate supervisor. 75. During or about November 2011, Coulombe again invited Short (PLCB representatives), Brungo and Doran (White Rock representatives), and Desmond (Capital Wine and Spirits representative) to his residence near Naples, Florida, for a weekend golf outing to occur at Bonita Bay East. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 18 a. No PLCB business purpose existed for the trip. 1. All expenses related to the trip were paid by White Rock. b. Short informed Schwenk that he was to accompany him. 76. The dates established for the golf trip to Bonita Bay called for Schwenk, Short, and the remaining invitees to arrive in Florida on Thursday, December 1, 2011, and depart on Saturday, December 3, 2011. a. Thursday, December 1, 2011, and Friday, December 2, 2011, were regularly scheduled work days for Commonwealth employees. b. Schwenk utilized a total of fifteen (15) hours of annual leave to account for his absence from work on December 1, 2011, and December 2, 2011. 77. Lodging accommodations were made on behalf of Schwenk and Short at the Hyatt Coconut Point Resort and Spa located at 5001 Coconut Road, Bonita Springs, Florida, for the nights of December 1, 2011, and December 2, 2011. a. The cost associated with one night of lodging at the Hyatt Coconut Point Resort and Spa totaled approximately $354.31 including taxes and fees. b. Expenses associated with Schwenk’s two nights of lodging at the Hyatt Coconut Point Resort and Spa totaled approximately $708.62. 78. Schwenk and Short traveled to Florida on December 1, 2011, and followed the scheduled itinerary as detailed below: a. December 1, 2011: 1. Arrival at Fort Meyers on Delta Airlines: 11:36 a.m. 2. Free time to relax at the pool or enjoy spa service: 12:00-4:00 p.m. 3. Meet in lobby for transfer to Coulombe’s house for cocktails: 5:00 p.m. 4. Dinner at Capital Grill: 7:00 p.m. b. December 2, 2011: 1. Meet in lobby to depart for lunch at Bonita Bay East: 10:15 a.m. 2. Golf at Bonita Bay East: 12:30 p.m. 3. Meet in lobby for transfer to dinner: 6:30 p.m. 4. Dinner at Handsome Harry’s: 7:00 p.m. c. December 3, 2011: 1. Depart airport on Delta Airlines: 11:06 a.m. d. No PLCB business meetings were held during the three day time frame. 79. All of Schwenk’s and Short’s expenses associated with the trip (e.g., airfare, greens fees, meals, entertainment, etc.) were paid for by Coulombe and/or White Rock representatives. 80. Total expenses for the golf trip sponsored by Coulombe/White Rock could not be fully determined, particularly airfare, greens fees and meals and entertainment. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 19 a. No specific records were provided by White Rock detailing the costs associated with the trip, with the exception of three entries on Brungo’s expense summary report for December 2, 2011. 1. Brungo’s expense report for December 2, 2011, documented meals purchased at the Hyatt in the amount of $405.73 and drinks purchased at Handsome Harry’s in the amount of $69.80 respectively for entertainment regarding Short, Schwenk, Doran, and Desmond. aa. The approximate cost was $95.10 per person. 2. Brungo’s expense report for the week ending December 2, 2011, document lodging fees totaling $3,543.12 in regard to lodging in Bonita Springs, Florida. aa. Brungo paid for individual rooms for Schwenk, Short, Desmond, Doran, and herself for two nights ($354.31 x 5 x 2 = $3,543.10). 81. Current airfare for one round-trip ticket from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport (a/k/a Fort Meyers Airport) with one stop is approximately $330.20. a. White Rock representatives confirmed, in sworn statements to Commission Investigators, paying for Schwenk’s airfare but did not provide records confirming the expenses. 82. Schwenk and Short accepted the travel, lodging, and hospitality associated with the golf trip to Bonita Bay, Florida, from Coulombe at a time when White Rock and Capital Wine and Spirits were then conducting business with the PLCB. 83. The total cost of Schwenk’s attendance at the golf trips is at least as follows: 2010: 2011: Drinks: $ 34.51 Room: $ 708.62 Airfare: $ 330.20 Drinks: $ 95.11 Wages: $ 409.80 Airfare: $ 330.20 ________ ________ Total: $ 774.51 Total: $1,133.93 a. These amounts do not include all meals, greens fees, and other transportation. b. All expenses associated with the event, including airfare, lodging, greens fees, subsistence, and entertainment, were paid for by White Rock Distilleries representatives. 84. In addition to the golf trips to Bonita Bay, Schwenk was provided with meals/hospitality from Brungo and/or Doran while Schwenk was employed as Director of Product Selection. a. Most of these offers were made in conjunction to similar offers made to James Short. b. Absent Schwenk’s employment with the PLCB, Schwenk would not have been in a position to receive the meals/hospitality from Brungo and/or Doran, White Rock Distilleries representatives. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 20 1. The total specific value of all the meals/hospitality received by Schwenk from Brungo and/or Doran could not be determined. THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATE TO SCHWENK’S GENERAL RECEIPT OF GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN A POSITION TO RECEIVE ABSENT HIS EMPLOYMENT WITH THE PLCB. 85. Vendor representatives make regular appearances at the PLCB offices located in the Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. a. Primary vendors and/or suppliers who marketed products to the PLCB with whom Schwenk interacted on a regular basis included Capital Wine and Spirits; Southern Wine and Spirits; Majestic Wine and Spirits; White Rock Distilleries; Beam Global Spirits and Wine; and Diageo, among others. 1. Specific representatives Schwenk dealt with from the primary vendors included, in part, the following: aa. Capital Wine and Spirits: 1. Mark Littles, President 2. Christina Desmond, Director of Marketing and Business Analytics bb. Southern Wine and Spirits: 1. Brad Waxman, Executive Vice President, General Manager, Southern Wine and Spirits of PA cc. Majestic Wine and Spirits: 1. Christopher Papariello, Executive Vice President dd. White Rock Distilleries: 1. Tricia Brungo, Control States Manager 2. Paul Doran, Regional Sales Manager ee. Beam Global Spirits and Wine: 1. Erin (a/k/a Red) Schiller, Pennsylvania State Account Manager. 86. As part of the marketing process, vendor representatives routinely offered and provided PLCB employees with items of value, including but not limited to the following:  Alcohol  Meals, including lunches and dinners  Golf outings  Out of state golf trips  Gift cards/certificates Schwenk, 13-008 Page 21 a. Schwenk accepted gifts, hospitality, and/or other items of economic value on a regular basis from multiple vendor representatives, including but not limited to, Littles, Desmond, Waxman, Brungo, Doran, and Schiller. b. Schwenk was offered meals and gifts by vendors due to his position(s) with the PLCB. c. Schwenk was provided items by vendors in his official capacity as part of the marketing of products by vendors. 87. Schwenk received direction from James Short to accept items, including alcohol, gifts cards, golf trips, etc. a. Schwenk was aware that employees who did not accept items of value provided by vendors were subject to retaliation and threats of dismissal. 88. Schwenk, Short, and Steve Pollack, Chief of the PLCB Chairman Select Program, made regular trips to California to purchase wine for the Chairman Select Program. a. Prior to 2010, the trips would include tasting at various wineries in the region. 1. The PLCB employees would be accompanied by PLCB vendor marketing representatives from Capital, Majestic and Southern. b. In or about 2010, the tastings were scheduled for a hotel conference room. 1. Vendors would arrange wineries to make presentations over the course of three (3) days. c. Following a day of testing, vendor representatives would provide dinner for Schwenk, Short, and Pollack. 1. The primary vendor representatives providing dinner were from Capital and Majestic. d. Schwenk accepted dinners and drinks annually between 2010 and 2012 from these vendors who were attempting to get products selected for the Chairman’s Select Program. 1. Schwenk was advised by Short the dinners were part of PLCB business. 89. While serving in the position of PLCB Chief of Category Management and later as the Director of Product Selection, Schwenk received and accepted meals/hospitality and/or gifts during Chairman Select buying trips from Littles and/or Desmond, representatives of Capital Wine and Spirits. a. Littles’ expense summaries identify Schwenk as being present when meals/hospitality were offered to PLCB employees. 1. Specific expenses could not be directly attributed to Schwenk. 90. Desmond’s expense summaries document meals/hospitality and/or gifts provided to Schwenk, as a PLCB employee, as detailed below: Activity Net Description Additional Text Date Amount Schwenk, 13-008 Page 22 Activity Net Description Additional Text Date Amount 11/03/2010 $75.00 Nordstrom gift for buyer None 11/28/2011 $325.00 Bumble Bee Hollow: gift for None buyer 02/15/2012 $200.00 Nordstrom: gift for buyer None a. Schwenk does not recall receipt of the Nordstrom gifts and denies receipt of same. 91. Schwenk accepted the meals/hospitality and/or gifts from Littles and/or Desmond at a time when Schwenk was responsible for making recommendations to the PLCB Board regarding product purchasing, as well as listing and delisting, of products from suppliers represented by Capital Wine and Spirits. a. Absent Schwenk’s employment with the PLCB, Schwenk would not have been in a position to receive the meals/hospitality and/or gifts from Littles and/or Desmond, PLCB vendor representatives. THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATE TO ALLEGATIONS THAT SCHWENK FAILED TO DISCLOSE HIS RECEIPT OF GIFTS, TRANSPORTATION, LODGING, AND/OR HOSPITALITY ON STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS FILED FOR THE 2010 THROUGH 2011 CALENDAR YEARS. 92. Statement of Financial Interests (“SFI”) filing requirements for public officials and public employees are mandated by Section 1104 of the State Ethics Act, which st requires a public official/employee to file an SFI no later than May 1 of each year that he/she holds such a position and the year after leaving such a position. st 93. Schwenk was required to file Statements of Financial Interests by May 1 annually in his position as a PLCB Merchandising and Pricing Coordinator, PLCB Chief of Category Management, and PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising. 94. Information to be disclosed on Statements of Financial Interests filed by public officials and public employees is mandated by Section 1105 of the State Ethics Act. a. Section 1105(b), Subsections 1-10 identify specific information to be disclosed, as well as exceptions to disclosure requirements, when applicable. 1. Section 1105(b)(6) mandates disclosure of the following on Statements of Financial interests filed: “The name and address of the source and the amount of any gift or gifts valued in the aggregate at $250 or more and the circumstances of each gift. This paragraph shall not apply to a gift or gifts received from a spouse, parent, parent by marriage, sibling, child, grandchild, other family member or friend when the circumstances make it clear that the motivation for the action was a personal or family relationship. However, for the purposes of this paragraph, the term “friend” shall not include a registered lobbyist or an employee of a registered lobbyist.” Schwenk, 13-008 Page 23 2. Section 1105(b)(7) mandates disclosure of the following on Statements of Financial interests filed: “The name and address of the source and the amount of any payment for or reimbursement of actual expenses for transportation and lodging or hospitality received in connection with public office or employment where such actual expenses for transportation and lodging or hospitality exceed $650 in an aggregate amount per year. This paragraph shall not apply to expenses reimbursed by a governmental body or to expenses reimbursed by an organization or association of public officials or employees of political subdivisions which the public official or employee serves in an official capacity.” 95. Schwenk filed Statements of Financial Interests for calendar years 2008 through 2012 in compliance with Section 1104 of the State Ethics Act as follows: Date Filed Calendar Year 03/04/2009 2008 04/01/2010 2009 03/01/2011 2010 03/05/2012 2011 03/31/2013 2012 a. Schwenk claimed to have received no gifts valued at over $250.00 in the aggregate for calendar years 2008 through 2012 in his position as the PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising. 1. Schwenk’s calendar year 2008 through 2012 Statements of Financial Interests all documented “none” in relation to gifts received. b. Schwenk disclosed transportation, lodging, and hospitality received from the Italian Wine & Food Institute (value of $2,781.00) and the St. Croix Rum Council (valued at $4,000.00) on his 2009 and 2011 calendar year SFIs respectively. 1. No additional receipt of transportation, lodging, and hospitality was disclosed on Schwenk’s 2009 and 2011 calendar year SFIs. 2. Schwenk’s 2008, 2010, and 2012 calendar year Statements of Financial Interests documented “none” in relation to transportation, lodging, and hospitality received. c. Schwenk’s signature is present on each Statement of Financial Interests filed, signifying that the information provided on the form is true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief subject to penalties prescribed by 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (unsworn falsification to authorities) and the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1109(b). 96. Schwenk failed to disclose the name and address of the source and the amount of gifts received valued in the aggregate at $250 or more from vendors doing business with the PLCB and the circumstances of each gift on his Statements of Financial Interests filed for calendar year 2011. a. Schwenk failed to disclose gifts received from Christine Desmond, Capital Wine & Spirits representative, in the total amount of $325.00 in 2011. 97. Schwenk failed to disclose the name and address of \[sic\] any payment for or Schwenk, 13-008 Page 24 reimbursement of actual expenses for transportation and lodging or hospitality received in excess of $650.00 in the aggregate per year from vendors doing business with the PLCB on his Statements of Financial Interests filed for calendar years 2010 and 2011 as documented below: Year Source Description Minimum Value 2010 Paul Coulombe, White Rock Three day golf trip to Bonita Bay, $650.00+ Florida/Naples, Florida area plus round trip airfare 2010 Beau Clark, W.J. Duetsch Three day golf trip to Pebble Beach, CA, $1,971.87 all expenses paid 2011 Paul Coulombe, White Rock Three day golf trip to Bonita Bay, $1,133.93 Florida/Naples, Florida area, all expenses paid a. No specific expense documents were provided by the vendor for the 2010 golf trip to the Bonita Bay/Naples area. 1. Additional transportation/lodging/hospitality associated with the trip included lodging at Coulombe’s home for three days and two nights, all meals, greens fees for eighteen holes of golf, and entertainment expenses. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 25 III.DISCUSSION: As the Director of Product Selection for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) from approximately July 2010 until January 2013, Respondent Matthew Schwenk, hereinafter also referred to as “Respondent,” “Respondent Schwenk,” and “Schwenk,” has been a public official/public employeesubject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. The allegations are that Schwenk violated Sections 1103(a) and 1105(b) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a) and 1105(b): (1) when he used the authority of his public position for the private pecuniary benefit of himself by soliciting and/or accepting items of value from vendors of the PLCB at a time when he was responsible for, and participated in, PLCB decisions to place vendor products in PLCB liquor stores; (2) when he solicited and/or accepted travel/hospitality/lodging from Commonwealth vendors; and (3) when he failed to disclose on Statements of Financial Interests (“SFIs”) his receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging and hospitality for calendar years 2010 through 2012. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee is prohibited from engaging in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest: § 1103. Restricted activities (a)Conflict of interest.— No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a). The term "conflict of interest" is defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act prohibits a public official/public employee from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Section 1105(a) of the Ethics Act provides that the Statement of Financial Interests shall be filed on the form prescribed by this Commission; that all information requested on Schwenk, 13-008 Page 26 the form shall be provided to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the filer; and that the form shall be signed under oath or equivalent affirmation. Section 1105(b) of the Ethics Act and its subsections detail the financial disclosure that a person required to file the Statement of Financial Interests form must provide. Subject to certain statutory exceptions not applicable to this matter, Section 1105(b)(6) of the Ethics Act requires the filer to disclose on the Statement of Financial Interests the name and address of the source and the amount of any gift or gifts valued in the aggregate at $250 or more and the circumstances of each gift. Subject to certain statutory exceptions not applicable to this matter, Section 1105(b)(7) of the Ethics Act requires the filer to disclose on the Statement of Financial Interests the name and address of the source and the amount of any payment for or reimbursement of actual expenses for transportation and lodging or hospitality received in connection with public office or employment where such actual expenses exceed $650 in an aggregate amount per year. As noted above, the parties have submitted a Consent Agreement and Stipulation of Findings. The parties' Stipulated Findings are set forth above as the Findings of this Commission. We shall now summarize the relevant facts as contained therein. Respondent Schwenk held multiple positions during his tenure with the PLCB including Clerk, Management Analyst, Merchandising and Pricing Coordinator, and Chief of Category Management. Schwenk served as the Director of Product Selection for the PLCB from approximately July 2010 until January 2013. In this capacity, Schwenk reported directly to James Short (“Short”), PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising. Schwenk’s job description for the position of Director of Product Selection for the PLCB included, inter alia, the following responsibilities and duties: (1) planning, developing, directing, and coordinating the PLCB’s comprehensive statewide marketing and merchandising programs/functions; (2) developing, implementing, and evaluating policies and operational procedures to ensure the efficient marketing of regularly listed and luxury wine and spirits products; (3) directing a centralized marketing and merchandising program; (4) advising on proposed policy changes for improved agency profitability; (5) presenting analysis of supplier proposals to add products and making recommendations to the Director of Marketing for prospective new product introduction or trial, or recommendations for discontinuation of currently offered products; and (6) leading negotiations with vendors on product promotion proposals involving discounts, rebates, incentives, luxury items, or one-time buys. The PLCB is governed by a three-Member Board. The PLCB regulates the sale of alcohol in Pennsylvania. In order for an alcoholic beverage to be sold in Pennsylvania, it must be authorized for sale by the PLCB. The PLCB is the only retail seller of wine/spirits in the Commonwealth. The PLCB adds and removes products sold in PLCB retail stores through a process known as “listing” and “delisting.” The parties have stipulated that the PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising, Chief of the Product Management and Pricing Division, and Merchandising Pricing Coordinator(s) are usually responsible for evaluating new products. The Director of Marketing and Merchandising and the Chief of the Product Management and Pricing Division make the final recommendation to the PLCB Board Members as to what product(s) should be listed or delisted. The PLCB relied primarily on recommendations made by Short, the Director of Marketing and Merchandising, and his subordinates, including Schwenk as the Director of Product Selection, when making Schwenk, 13-008 Page 27 listing/delisting decisions. The Board conducted no independent review of products and relied on staff recommendations. A manufacturer/supplier of alcoholic beverage products may market its products to the PLCB directly or through a vendor or broker. The primary vendors providing products to the PLCB are: (1) Southern Wine and Spirits (“Southern”); (2) Capital Wine and Spirits (“Capital”); and (3) Allied Beverage Group, LLC (“Allied”), which has a subsidiary named “Majestic Wine & Spirits, USA, LLC” (“Majestic”). Products for which Southern serves as broker and/or vendor/vendor of record account for approximately 6.43% to 6.85% of the PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years. Capital is a member of the “Charmer Sunbelt Group,” a nationwide distributor of wine, spirits, beer, and other beverages. Products brokered by Capital account for a total of approximately 19.11% to 22.03% of the PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years. In Pennsylvania, Capital/Charmer Sunbelt Group represents a marketing partnership named “the Alliance,” which is comprised of wine/spirit suppliers Bacardi USA (“Bacardi”), Brown-Forman, and Remy Cointreau (“Remy”). Capital also previously represented White Rock Distilleries, a former supplier of alcohol/spirits to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Allied was created by the mergers of The Baxter Group, Inc., F&A Distributing Company and The Jaydor Corporation. Allied ranks among the ten largest wine and spirits distributors in the United States. Allied subsidiary Majestic is a Pennsylvania brokerage and vendor/vendor of record for products sold to the PLCB. Allied’s and/or Majestic’s sales account for approximately 1.51% to 2.18% of PLCB total Cost of Goods Sold during the last five (5) years. Executives and marketing representatives from vendors supplying products to the PLCB would meet with PLCB employees to market products. Those representatives offered gifts and hospitality to PLCB representatives. These items were offered when listing/delisting of products was occurring. Items of value were routinely provided to PLCB officials in decision making positions regarding product selection and placement. Representatives of the numerous PLCB vendors frequently contacted Schwenk and various other PLCB representatives to market new and existing products. Some of these products were subject to the listing/delisting process. Other products were luxury products which are not subject to listing/delisting procedures. Primary vendors and/or suppliers who marketed products to the PLCB with whom Schwenk interacted on a regular basis included Capital, Southern, Majestic, White Rock Distilleries (“White Rock”); Beam Global Spirits and Wine (“Beam”); and Diageo. Specific representatives with whom Schwenk dealt included the following: Mark Littles (“Littles”), President of Capital; Cristina Desmond (“Desmond”), Director of Marketing and Business Analytics for Capital; Brad M. Waxman (“Waxman”), Executive Vice President, General Manager of Southern Wine and Spirits of PA; Christopher Papariello (“Papariello”), Executive Vice-President of Majestic; Tricia Brungo (“Brungo”), Control States Manager of White Rock; Paul Doran (“Doran”), Regional Sales Manager of White Rock; and Erin (a/k/a “Red”) Schiller, Pennsylvania State Account Manager of Beam. In 2009, 2010, and 2011, Capital/Alliance held golf outings referred to as the “Alliance Golf Open,” which included officials and management employees of the PLCB. The Alliance Golf Open was organized as a means by which Capital and the Alliance suppliers could strengthen their relationship with the PLCB and to allow various Alliance senior management officials to have “face time” with PLCB officials. These events were primarily social in nature. No specific business presentations were made by Capital and/or Schwenk, 13-008 Page 28 the Alliance suppliers at the events. The costs associated with the 2009, 2010, and 2011 Alliance Golf Open were divided into four equal amounts paid by Capital, Bacardi, Brown- Forman, and Remy. Schwenk attended all three events. The 2009 Alliance Golf Open was held at the West Shore County Club in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, on August 19, 2009. PLCB attendees at the event included PLCB CEO Joe Conti (“Conti”), Short, and Schwenk. Schwenk attended this event at the direction of Short. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” as he was advised to attend by Short and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. The value of the golf outing totaled approximately $105.09 per individual. The 2010 Alliance Golf Open was held at the River Crest Golf Club in Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, on July 15, 2010. PLCB attendees at the event included Short, Schwenk and PLCB Chairman P.J. Stapleton. Schwenk attended this event at the direction of Short. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” as he was directed to attend by Short and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. The value of the golf outing totaled approximately $490.87 per individual. Additionally, at Short’s direction, Schwenk submitted a Commonwealth Travel Expense Voucher (“TEV”) claiming reimbursement from the Commonwealth for purported business expenses totaling $195.24 for this trip. The 2011 Alliance Golf Open was held at the Philadelphia Country Club in Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, on July 14, 2011. PLCB attendees at the event included Short, Conti, Schwenk, Stapleton, and Doug Hitz, PLCB Bureau Director for Planning and Procurement. Schwenk was authorized to attend this event by Short. Schwenk believed the event was “work related” and therefore did not utilize leave or vacation time, nor was he instructed to do so by Short or any other PLCB official. The expenses of the golf outing totaled approximately $474.40 per attendee. Additionally, at Short’s direction, Schwenk submitted a TEV claiming reimbursement from the Commonwealth for purported business expenses totaling $130.20 for this trip. Majestic is the broker representative of supplier W.J. Deutsch and Sons (“W.J. Deutsch”). In August 2010, Short and Schwenk attended an all-expense paid three day golf trip to Pebble Beach, California, provided by Majestic/W. J. Deutsch, a vendor doing business with the PLCB. Schwenk was informed by Short that he was to attend. Short, Schwenk, Papariello, and Beau Clark (“Clark”), the Pennsylvania District Manager for W. J. Deutsch, participated in the event. The trip was submitted as a business expense by Clark and Papariello. Costs associated with the trip included airfare, lodging, greens fees, subsistence, and entertainment. The parties have stipulated that Schwenk realized a private pecuniary gain of at least $1,971.87 in association with his acceptance of the all- expense paid three day golf trip to Pebble Beach provided by Majestic/W. J. Deutsch at a time when Majestic/W.J. Deutsch and Sons had ongoing business dealings with the PLCB. In 2010 and 2011, Short and Schwenk attended two all-expense paid three day golf trips to Bonita Bay East, Florida, at the invitation of Paul Coulombe (“Coulombe”), then the owner/CEO of White Rock. Short directed or informed Schwenk that Schwenk was to accompany Short on these trips. No PLCB business purpose existed for these trips, and no PLCB business meetings were held as part of either of these trips. Schwenk was informed by Short not to utilize leave for the 2010 trip. Schwenk utilized a total of fifteen (15) hours of annual leave to account for his absence from work during the 2011 trip. All of Short’s and Schwenk’s expenses associated with these trips (airfare, greens fees, meals, entertainment, and the like) were paid for by Coulombe, White Rock and/or White Rock representatives. The parties have stipulated that the cost of Schwenk’s attendance at the aforesaid two all-expense paid, three day golf trips to Bonita Bay was at least $774.51 for the 2010 trip and at least $1,133.93 for the 2011 trip. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 29 In addition to the golf trips to Bonita Bay, Schwenk was provided with meals/hospitality from then White Rock representatives Brungo and/or Doran while Schwenk was employed as Director of Product Selection. Most of these offers were made in conjunction to similar offers made to Short. Absent Schwenk’s employment with the PLCB, Schwenk would not have been in a position to receive the meals/hospitality from Brungo and/or Doran, White Rock representatives. The total specific value of all the meals/hospitality received by Schwenk from Brungo and/or Doran could not be determined. Vendor representatives make regular appearances at the PLCB offices located in the Northwest Office Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. As part of the marketing process, vendor representatives routinely offered and provided PLCB employees with items of value, including but not limited to alcohol, meals, golf outings, out of state golf trips and gift cards/certificates. Schwenk accepted gifts, hospitality, and/or other items of economic value on a regular basis from multiple vendor representatives, including but not limited to, Littles, Desmond, Waxman, Brungo, Doran, and Schiller. Schwenk was offered meals and gifts by vendors due to his position(s) with the PLCB. Schwenk was provided items by vendors in his official capacity as part of the marketing of products by vendors. Schwenk received direction from Short to accept items, including alcohol, gifts cards, golf trips, and the like. Schwenk was aware that employees who did not accept items of value provided by vendors were subject to retaliation and threats of dismissal. Schwenk, Short, and Steve Pollack, Chief of the PLCB Chairman Select Program, made regular trips to California to purchase wine for the Chairman Select Program. Between 2010 and 2012, Schwenk accepted dinners and drinks from vendors during trips to California to purchase wine for the PLCB’s Chairman Select Program. These vendors were attempting to get products selected for the Chairman’s Select Program. Schwenk was advised by Short the dinners were part of PLCB business. Littles’ expense summaries identify Schwenk as being present when meals/hospitality were offered to PLCB employees. Specific expenses could not be directly attributed to Schwenk. Desmond’s expense summaries document the following items provided to Schwenk, as a PLCB employee: Activity Net Description Date Amount 11/03/2010 $75.00 Nordstrom gift for buyer 11/28/2011 $325.00 Bumble Bee Hollow: gift for buyer 02/15/2012 $200.00 Nordstrom: gift for buyer Schwenk does not recall receipt of the Nordstrom gifts and denies receipt of same. Schwenk accepted the meals/hospitality and/or gifts from Littles and/or Desmond at a time when Schwenk was responsible for making recommendations to the PLCB Board regarding product purchasing, as well as listing and delisting of products from suppliers represented by Capital. Absent Schwenk’s employment with the PLCB, Schwenk would not have been in a position to receive the meals/hospitality and/or gifts from Littles and/or Desmond, PLCB vendor representatives. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 30 During the relevant time period, Schwenk was required to annually file an SFI by st May 1. Schwenk filed SFIs for calendar years 2008 through 2012. Schwenk claimed to have received no gifts valued at over $250.00 in the aggregate for Calendar Years 2008 through 2012 in his position as the PLCB Director of Marketing and Merchandising. Schwenk failed to disclose the name and address of the source and the amount of gifts received valued in the aggregate at $250 or more from vendors doing business with the PLCB and the circumstances of each gift on his Statements of Financial Interests filed for calendar year 2011. Schwenk failed to disclose gifts received from Desmond in the total amount of $325.00 in 2011. Schwenk failed to disclose on his SFIs filed for calendar years 2010 and 2011 required information as to reportable transportation and lodging or hospitality he received from PLCB vendors as detailed below: Year Source Description Minimum Value 2010 Paul Coulombe, White Rock Three day golf trip to Bonita Bay, $650.00+ Florida/Naples, Florida area plus round trip airfare 2010 Beau Clark, W.J. Duetsch Three day golf trip to Pebble Beach, CA, $1,971.87 all expenses paid 2011 Paul Coulombe, White Rock Three day golf trip to Bonita Bay, $1,133.93 Florida/Naples, Florida area, all expenses paid Having highlighted the Stipulated Findings and issues before us, we shall now apply the Ethics Act to determine the proper disposition of this case. The parties' Consent Agreement sets forth a proposed resolution of the allegations as follows: 3. The Investigative Division will recommend the following in relation to the above allegations: a. That, as part of a negotiated settlement agreement, no violation of Section 1103(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendors of the PLCB; and b. That a violation of Section 1105(b) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s neglect to report receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendor(s) of the PLCB, upon Statements of Financial Interests filed for the 2010 through 2011 calendar years. 1. No reporting violation occurred for calendar year 2012, as insufficient evidence exists to support a finding of a violation of Section 1105(b). 4. Schwenk agrees to make payment in the amount of $500.00 in settlement of this matter payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and forwarded to the Pennsylvania State Ethics Schwenk, 13-008 Page 31 Commission within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the final adjudication in this matter. 5. Schwenk agrees to file complete and accurate amended Statements of Financial Interests with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board through the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission, for 2010 and 2011 calendar years within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the final adjudication in this matter. 6. Schwenk agrees to not accept any reimbursement, compensation or other payment from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania representing a full or partial reimbursement of the amount paid in settlement of this matter. 7. The Investigative Division will recommend that the State Ethics Commission take no further action in this matter; and make no specific recommendations to any law enforcement or other authority to take action in this matter. Such, however, does not prohibit the Commission from initiating appropriate enforcement actions in the event of Respondent's failure to comply with this agreement or the Commission's order or cooperating with any other authority who may so choose to review this matter further. Consent Agreement, at 1-2. As part of a negotiated settlement agreement, the parties have recommended that this Commission find that no violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendors of the PLCB. It is clear that Schwenk’s receipt of such items occurred at the direction or with the authorization of his immediate supervisor, Short. Schwenk attended the 2009, 2010 and 2011 Alliance Golf Open, the August 2010 golf trip to Pebble Beach, California, and the 2010 and 2011 golf trips to Bonita Bay East, Florida, at the direction or with the authorization of Short. Schwenk accepted gifts, hospitality, and/or other items of economic value on a regular basis from multiple vendor representatives. The parties have stipulated that Schwenk received direction from Short to accept items, including alcohol, gifts cards, golf trips, and the like, and that Schwenk was aware that employees who did not accept items of value provided by vendors were subject to retaliation and threats of dismissal. One of the elements for establishing a violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act is use of the authority of the public position. In this case, Schwenk’s acceptance of gifts, hospitality, and/or other items of economic value from PLCB vendors occurred at the direction and with the authorization of his immediate supervisor, Short. Based upon the Stipulated Findings and Consent Agreement, we accept the recommendation of the parties, and we hold that per the negotiated settlement agreement of the parties, no violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendors of the PLCB. The parties have agreed, and we hold, t hat a violation of Section 1105(b) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s neglect to report receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendor(s) of the PLCB, upon SFIs filed for the 2010 through 2011 calendar years. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 32 We accept the parties’ recommendation and we hold that no reporting violation occurred for calendar year 2012, as insufficient evidence exists to support a finding of a violation of Section 1105(b), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b). As part of the Consent Agreement, Schwenk has agreed to make payment in the amount of $500.00 in settlement of this matter payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and forwarded to this Commission within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the final adjudication in this matter. Schwenk has agreed to not accept any reimbursement, compensation or other payment from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania representing a full or partial reimbursement of the amount paid in settlement of this matter. Schwenk has agreed to file complete and accurate amended SFIs with the PLCB through this Commission for the 2010 and 2011 calendar years within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the final adjudication in this matter. We determine that the Consent Agreement submitted by the parties sets forth a proper disposition for this case, based upon our review as reflected in the above analysis and the totality of the facts and circumstances. Accordingly, per the Consent Agreement of the parties, Schwenk is directed to make payment in the amount of $500.00 payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania th and forwarded to this Commission by no later than the thirtieth (30) day after the mailing date of this adjudication and Order. Per the Consent Agreement of the parties, Schwenk is directed to not accept any reimbursement, compensation or other payment from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania representing a full or partial reimbursement of the amount paid in settlement of this matter. To the extent he has not already done so, Schwenk is directed to file complete and accurate amended SFIs for the 2010 and 2011 calendar years with the PLCB, through this th Commission, by no later than the thirtieth (30) day after the mailing date of this adjudication and Order. Compliance with the foregoing will result in the closing of this case with no further action by this Commission. Noncompliance will result in the institution of an order enforcement action. IV.CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. As the Director of Product Selection for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) from approximately July 2010 until January 2013, Respondent Matthew Schwenk (“Schwenk”) has been a public official/public employeesubject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. 2. Per the negotiated settlement agreement of the parties, no violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendors of the PLCB. A 3. violation of Section 1105(b) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s neglect to report receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendor(s) of the PLCB, upon Statements of Financial Interests filed for the 2010 through 2011 calendar years. Schwenk, 13-008 Page 33 4. No reporting violation occurred for calendar year 2012, as insufficient evidence exists to support a finding of a violation of Section 1105(b), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b). In Re: Matthew Schwenk, : File Docket: 13-008 Respondent : Date Decided: 6/16/14 : Date Mailed: 7/10/14 ORDER NO. 1641 1. Per the negotiated settlement agreement of the parties, Matthew Schwenk (“Schwenk”)--a public official/public employee in his capacity as the Director of Product Selection for the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) from approximately July 2010 until January 2013--did not violate Section 1103(a) of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(a), in relation to his receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendors of the PLCB. A 2. violation of Section 1105(b) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b), occurred in relation to Schwenk’s neglect to report receipt of gifts, transportation, lodging, and/or hospitality from vendor(s) of the PLCB, upon Statements of Financial Interests filed for the 2010 through 2011 calendar years. 3. No reporting violation occurred for calendar year 2012, as insufficient evidence exists to support a finding of a violation of Section 1105(b), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1105(b). Per the Consent Agreement of the parties, Schwenk is directed to make payment in 4. the amount of $500.00 payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and forwarded to the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission by no later than the th thirtieth (30) day after the mailing date of this Order. Per the Consent Agreement of the parties, Schwenk is directed to not accept any 5. reimbursement, compensation or other payment from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania representing a full or partial reimbursement of the amount paid in settlement of this matter. To the extent he has not already done so, Schwenk is directed to file complete and 6. accurate amended Statements of Financial Interests for the 2010 and 2011 calendar years with the PLCB, through the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission, th by no later than the thirtieth (30) day after the mailing date of this Order. Compliance with paragraphs 4, 5, and 6 of this Order will result in the closing of this 7. case with no further action by this Commission. a. Non-compliance will result in the institution of an order enforcement action. BY THE COMMISSION, ___________________________ John J. Bolger, Chair