Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-520 Confidential ADVICE OF COUNSEL May 16, 2014 14-520 This responds to your letter dated March 19, 2014, by which you requested a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission. Issue: Whether the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq., would impose prohibitions or restrictions upon an individual serving as a school director, who in a private capacity is an A of a company that provides fundraising opportunities for various organizations, with regard to such company entering into fundraising arrangements with groups affiliated with the school district; and whether the restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act (pertaining to contracting) would apply to such fundraising arrangements. Facts: As Solicitor for the \[name of school district\] (“School District”), you have been authorized to request a confidential advisory from the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission on behalf of Individual B, who is a School Director for the School District. You have submitted facts, the material portion of which may be fairly summarized as follows. Individual B was first elected as a School Director in \[month, year\]. In a private capacity, Individual B is an A of a company named \[name of company\] (“the Company”). Among other business endeavors, the Company provides fundraising opportunities for various organizations (“Client Organizations”), including schools. Fundraisers are arranged by a member of the Company’s sales team. The Company does not enter into a formal contract with a Client Organization as to a fundraising arrangement, and there is no expectation of any particular result. Rather, \[description of fundraising process\]. The Company has historically provided fundraising opportunities for various groups affiliated with the School District (“School District Client Organizations”), including \[list of groups\]. You state that many of the School District Client Organizations are considered booster organizations, which under School District policy are organizations separate from the School District and operate independently of the School District. You state that School District Client Organizations are not required to seek approval or consent from the School District School Board (“School Board”) prior to engaging in fundraising with the Company. The selection of the Company to provide fundraising opportunities occurs within the sole discretion of each individual School District Client Organization. You state that School District Client Organizations are not Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 2 authorized to act on the School District’s behalf and that they cannot enter into a valid contract on the School District’s behalf. You further state that neither the School District nor the Public School Code requires that the School Board approve any fundraising arrangement between a School District Client Organization and the Company as no public dollars are expended on behalf of the School District to engage in these fundraisers. Individual B’s job duties as an A of the Company largely involve \[type of duties\], and he is not involved with sales. You state that while Individual B may have contact with Client Organizations, he now refrains from any contact with School District Client Organizations and \[description of step taken to insulate Individual B from such matters\]. You state that Individual B does not broadcast his membership on the School Board to Client Organizations or attempt to use his public office to convince other groups to use the Company for fundraising. You further state that any Company fundraisers conducted by School District Client Organizations during the 2013-2014 school year were C. Based upon the above submitted facts, you pose the following questions: (1) Whether Individual B would violate the Ethics Act as a result of the Company entering into fundraising arrangements with School District Client Organizations; and (2) Whether the restrictions of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to contracting, would apply to fundraising arrangements between School District Client Organizations and the Company. Discussion: It is initially noted that pursuant to Sections 1107(10) and 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11), advisories are issued to the requester based upon the facts that the requester has submitted. In issuing the advisory based upon the facts that the requester has submitted, the Commission does not engage in an independent investigation of the facts, nor does it speculate as to facts that have not been submitted. It is the burden of the requester to truthfully disclose all of the material facts relevant to the inquiry. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1107(10), (11). An advisory only affords a defense to the extent the requester has truthfully disclosed all of the material facts. As a School Director for the School District, Individual B is a public official subject to the provisions of the Ethics Act. Sections 1103(a) and 1103(j) of the Ethics Act provide: § 1103. Restricted activities (a)Conflict of interest.-- No public official or public employee shall engage in conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest. (j)Voting conflict.-- Where voting conflicts are not otherwise addressed by the Constitution of Pennsylvania or by any law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance, the following procedure shall be employed. Any public official or public employee who in the discharge of his official duties would be required to vote on a matter that would result in a conflict of interest shall abstain from voting and, prior to the vote being taken, publicly announce and disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in a written memorandum filed with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken, provided that whenever a governing body would be unable to take any action on a Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 3 matter before it because the number of members of the body required to abstain from voting under the provisions of this section makes the majority or other legally required vote of approval unattainable, then such members shall be permitted to vote if disclosures are made as otherwise provided herein. In the case of a three-member governing body of a political subdivision, where one member has abstained from voting as a result of a conflict of interest and the remaining two members of the governing body have cast opposing votes, the member who has abstained shall be permitted to vote to break the tie vote if disclosure is made as otherwise provided herein. 65 Pa.C.S. §§ 1103(a), (j). The following terms are defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Conflict" or "conflict of interest." Use by a public official or public employee of the authority of his office or employment or any confidential information received through his holding public office or employment for the private pecuniary benefit of himself, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. The term does not include an action having a de minimis economic impact or which affects to the same degree a class consisting of the general public or a subclass consisting of an industry, occupation or other group which includes the public official or public employee, a member of his immediate family or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. "Authority of office or employment." The actual power provided by law, the exercise of which is necessary to the performance of duties and responsibilities unique to a particular public office or position of public employment. "Business." Any corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, organization, self-employed individual, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any legal entity organized for profit. "Business with which he is associated." Any business in which the person or a member of the person's immediate family is a director, officer, owner, employee or has a financial interest. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, a public official/public employee is prohibited from using the authority of public office/employment or confidential information received by holding such a public position for the private pecuniary benefit of the public official/public employee himself, any member of his immediate family, or a business with which he or a member of his immediate family is associated. Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 4 Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act does not prohibit public officials/public employees from having outside business activities or employment; however, the public official/public employee may not use the authority of his public position--or confidential information obtained by being in that position--for the advancement of his own private pecuniary benefit or that of a business with which he is associated. Pancoe, Opinion 89-011. Examples of conduct that could form the basis for a conflict of interest under Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would include the pursuit of a private business opportunity in the course of public action (Metrick, Order 1037) and the participation in an official capacity as to matters involving the business with which the public official/public employee is associated in his private capacity or private client(s) (Miller, Opinion 89-024; Kannebecker, Opinion 92-010). A reasonable and legitimate expectation that a business relationship will form may also support a finding of a conflict of interest (Amato, Opinion 89-002). In each instance of a conflict of interest, the public official/public employee would be required to abstain from participation. The abstention requirement would not be limited merely to voting, but would extend to any use of authority of office including, but not limited to, discussing, conferring with others, and lobbying for a particular result. Juliante, Order 809. Subject to certain statutory exceptions, in each instance of a voting conflict, Section 1103(j) of the Ethics Act would require the public official/public employee to abstain and to publicly disclose the abstention and reasons for same, both orally and by filing a written memorandum to that effect with the person recording the minutes. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act, pertaining to contracting, provides as follows: § 1103. Restricted activities (f)Contract.-- No public official or public employee or his spouse or child or any business in which the person or his spouse or child is associated shall enter into any contract valued at $500 or more with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated or any subcontract valued at $500 or more with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body with which the public official or public employee is associated, unless the contract has been awarded through an open and public process, including prior public notice and subsequent public disclosure of all proposals considered and contracts awarded. In such a case, the public official or public employee shall not have any supervisory or overall responsibility for the implementation or administration of the contract. Any contract or subcontract made in violation of this subsection shall be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction if the suit is commenced within 90 days of the making of the contract or subcontract. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1103(f). The term “contract” is defined in the Ethics Act as follows: § 1102. Definitions "Contract." An agreement or arrangement for the acquisition, use or disposal by the Commonwealth or a political subdivision of consulting or other services or of supplies, materials, equipment, land or other personal or real property. The term shall not mean an agreement or arrangement between the State or political subdivision as Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 5 one party and a public official or public employee as the other party, concerning his expense, reimbursement, salary, wage, retirement or other benefit, tenure or other matters in consideration of his current public employment with the Commonwealth or a political subdivision. 65 Pa.C.S. § 1102. Section 1103(f) does not operate to make contracting with the governmental body permissible where it is otherwise prohibited. Rather, where a public official/public employee, his spouse or child, or a business with which he, his spouse or child is associated, is otherwise appropriately contracting with the governmental body, or subcontracting with any person who has been awarded a contract with the governmental body, in an amount of $500.00 or more, Section 1103(f) requires that an “open and public process” be observed as to the contract with the governmental body. Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act also provides that the public official/public employee may not have any supervisory or overall responsibility as to the implementation or administration of the contract with the governmental body. It is administratively noted that the Public School Code of 1949 as amended (“Public School Code”) provides in pertinent part: § 3-324. Not to be employed by or do business with district; exceptions (a) No school director shall, during the term for which he was elected or appointed, as a private person engaged in any business transaction with the school district in which he is elected or appointed, be employed in any capacity by the school district in which he is elected or appointed, or receive from such school district any pay for services rendered to the district except as provided in this act… …. (c) It shall not be a violation of this section for a school district to contract for the purchase of goods or services from a business with which a school director is associated to the extent permitted by and in compliance with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 11 (relating to ethics standards and financial disclosure). 24 P.S. §§ 3-324(a), (c). On its face, Section 3-324(c) of the Public School Code permits school districts to contract with businesses with which school directors are associated for the purchase of goods or services as long as the requirements of the Ethics Act are observed. In applying the above provisions of the Ethics Act to the instant matter, you are advised as follows. The Company is a business with which Individual B is associated in his capacity as an A. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, Individual B generally would have a conflict of interest as a School Director in matter(s) before the School Board that would financially impact him or the Company. In response to your first question, you are advised that the elements of a violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not be established as a result of the Company entering into fundraising arrangements with School District Client Organizations subject to the condition that Individual B would not use the authority of his position as a School Director or confidential information received by holding such public position in furtherance of the Company securing such fundraising arrangements. Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 6 With regard to your second question, you are advised as follows. You have factually submitted that the Company does not enter into a formal contract with a Client Organization as to a fundraising arrangement. You have factually submitted that many of the School District Client Organizations are considered booster organizations, which under School District policy are organizations separate from the School District and operate independently of the School District. You have further factually submitted that School District Client Organizations are not authorized to act on the School District’s behalf, cannot enter into a valid contract on the School District’s behalf, and are not required to seek approval or consent from the School Board prior to engaging in fundraising with the Company. You have additionally factually submitted that no public dollars are expended on behalf of the School District to engage in the fundraising arrangements with the Company. Under the submitted facts, you are advised that to the extent the Company would not be contracting with the School District, or entering into subcontracts with person(s) awarded contract(s) with the School District, the restrictions and requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would not apply to fundraising arrangements between the Company and the School District. Cf., Perini, Advice 08-506. The propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act; the applicability of any other statute, code, ordinance, regulation or other code of conduct other than the Ethics Act has not been considered in that they do not involve an interpretation of the Ethics Act. Conclusion: As a School Director for the \[name of school district\] (“School District”), Individual B is a public official subject to the provisions of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”), 65 Pa.C.S. § 1101 et seq. Based upon the submitted facts that: (1) Individual B was first elected as a School Director in \[month, year\]; (2) in a private capacity, Individual B is an A of a company named \[name of company\] (“the Company”); (3) among other business endeavors, the Company provides fundraising opportunities for various organizations (“Client Organizations”), including schools; (4) fundraisers are arranged by a member of the Company’s sales team; (5) the Company does not enter into a formal contract with a Client Organization as to a fundraising arrangement, and there is no expectation of any particular result, but rather, \[description of fundraising process\]; (6) the Company has historically provided fundraising opportunities for various groups affiliated with the School District (“School District Client Organizations”); (7) many of the School District Client Organizations are considered booster organizations, which under School District policy are organizations separate from the School District and operate independently of the School District; (8) School District Client Organizations are not required to seek approval or consent from the School District School Board (“School Board”) prior to engaging in fundraising with the Company; (9) the selection of the Company to provide fundraising opportunities occurs within the sole discretion of each individual School District Client Organization; (10) School District Client Organizations are not authorized to act on the School District’s behalf, and they cannot enter into a valid contract on the School District’s behalf; (11) neither the School District nor the Public School Code requires that the School Board approve any fundraising arrangement between a School District Client Organization and the Company as no public dollars are expended on behalf of the School District to engage in these fundraisers; (12) Individual B’s job duties as an A of the Company largely involve \[type of duties\], and he is not involved with sales; (13) while Individual B may have contact with Client Organizations, he now refrains from any contact with School District Client Organizations and \[description of step taken to insulate Individual B from such matters\]; (14) Individual B does not broadcast his membership on the School Board to Client Organizations or attempt to use his public office to convince other groups to use the Company for fundraising; and (15) any Company fundraisers conducted by School District Client Organizations during the 2013-2014 school year were C, you are advised as follows. Confidential Advice, 14-520 May 16, 2014 Page 7 The Company is a business with which Individual B is associated in his capacity as an A. Pursuant to Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act, Individual B generally would have a conflict of interest as a School Director in matter(s) before the School Board that would financially impact him or the Company. The elements of a violation of Section 1103(a) of the Ethics Act would not be established as a result of the Company entering into fundraising arrangements with School District Client Organizations subject to the condition that Individual B would not use the authority of his position as a School Director or confidential information received by holding such public position in furtherance of the Company securing such fundraising arrangements. To the extent the Company would not be contracting with the School District, or entering into subcontracts with person(s) awarded contract(s) with the School District, the restrictions and requirements of Section 1103(f) of the Ethics Act would not apply to fundraising arrangements between the Company and the School District. Lastly, the propriety of the proposed conduct has only been addressed under the Ethics Act. Pursuant to Section 1107(11) of the Ethics Act, an Advice is a complete defense in any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Commission, and evidence of good faith conduct in any other civil or criminal proceeding, provided the requester has disclosed truthfully all the material facts and committed the acts complained of in reliance on the Advice given. This letter is a public record and will be made available as such. Finally, if you disagree with this Advice or if you have any reason to challenge same, you may appeal the Advice to the full Commission. A personal appearance before the Commission will be scheduled and a formal Opinion will be issued by the Commission. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be actually received at the Commission within thirty (30) days of the date of this Advice pursuant to 51 Pa. Code § 13.2(h). The appeal may be received at the Commission by hand delivery, United States mail, delivery service, or by FAX transmission (717-787-0806). Failure to file such an appeal at the Commission within thirty (30) days may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sincerely, Robin M. Hittie Chief Counsel